RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00411
INDEX CODE:
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 AUG 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her records be corrected to show that she graduated from Security
Forces training.
2. Her narrative reason for discharge be changed.
3. Her grade be changed to reflect E-3.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She graduated from the Security Forces Academy in March 2000. She has no
documents to prove that she graduated, only her badge.
Applicant makes no contentions regarding her pay grade and the narrative
reason for her discharge.
In support of her request, she provided a personal statement. Her complete
submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 13
Oct 99 in the grade of airman basic. She entered into Security Forces
technical training on 29 Nov 99. On 11 May 00, she was notified by her
commander that he was recommending she be discharged from the Air Force
under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen
(Homosexual Acts). The basis for his recommendation was an Inspector
General (IG) investigation determined that at various times between October
1999 and January 2000, she engaged in homosexual conduct. A copy of the
investigative report is appended at Exhibit F. She was advised of her
rights in this matter and after consulting counsel, she offered a
conditional waiver of her rights contingent upon receipt of no less than an
honorable discharge. The base staff judge advocate found her case legally
sufficient and recommended acceptance of the conditional waiver. The
discharge authority approved her separation and directed that she be
discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and
rehabilitation. She was discharged on 17 Aug 00. She served 10 months and
5 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPWB recommends denial. DPPPWB states individuals enlisting for a
period of six years are promoted upon completion of either technical
training or 20 weeks of technical training, whichever occurs first, and
recommended for promotion by the immediate commander. No documentation was
found to verify she completed the Security Specialist course. There is
also no written recommendation from her commander for promotion or
promotion order indicating advancement to the grade of A1C. DPPPWB
therefore assumes she was not recommended for promotion based on the
findings of her investigation and subsequent discharge. The DPPPWB
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that the applicant's discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge
authority. She did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors in
the discharge processing. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18
Mar 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant an upgrade to her
narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, after
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record we find no evidence of an error
in this case and are not persuaded that she has been the victim of an
injustice. With respect to her request that her records be corrected to
show she completed Security Forces training and she be promoted to the
grade of E-3, we find no evidence, other than her own assertions, that she
completed Security Forces training and satisfied her contractual
requirements for promotion to the grade of E-3. Therefore, we agree with
the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-
00411 in Executive Session on 25 May 05, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 3 Mar 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 Mar 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Mar 05.
Exhibit F. IG Investigative Report - WITHDRAWN
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03122
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the applicant’s request to correct her rank on her DD Form 214 be denied. Based on the above finding, and in the absence of evidence of a formal military investigation, we also believe her records should be corrected to show that she was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant effective and with a date of rank of 1 June 2004. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nonselection for reenlistment and the Unfavorable Information(UIF)/Control Roster actions be rescinded; she be promoted, with all back pay; and she be awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM. DPPAE indicated that a review of the applicant's military personnel records revealed she was nonselected for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03432
On 12 Apr 00, applicant submitted a request for separation from the Air Force. However, since we believe it is unlikely that the applicant would have received Article 15 punishment for the failure to go specification, it is our opinion that the entire Article 15 action should be removed from her records and she be restored to the grade of staff sergeant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00055
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00055 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 6 April 2001 through 21 December 2001, is declared void and removed from his records. The HQ AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB states...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03434
MSgt K---, a member of his AFS (4Y0X0), was attending the First Sergeant Academy and her record was scored in the 4Y0X0 career field. Each individual's record was corrected, they were provided supplemental promotion consideration, and not selected for promotion in the 8F000 CAFSC. Therefore, the CAFSC effective date would be the date assigned duty--11 Nov 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01793
The patrolman reported that the applicant stated that he was not going to be handcuffed and he grabbed the patrolman’s arm. He also stated that the witnesses’ statement was not true. He contends that out of three alcohol incidents under the same commander, only the African Americans were punished.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01716
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement, copy of statement Reason for Appeal of Referral EPR, AF IMT Form 910 Enlisted Performance Report, a Rebuttal to Referral Report Memorandum, a Letter of Appreciation, AF Form IMT 931, Performance Feedback Worksheet, five Letters of Recommendation and excerpts from her military personnel records. On 3 October 2005, an unsigned copy of the referral EPR dated 30 September 2005 was presented to her. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02811
His performance to date did not warrant he be selected for reenlistment. On 7 Jan 05, the applicant’s commander concurred with the supervisor’s recommendation and nonselected him for reenlistment. At the end of the deferral period, the applicant received a letter stating his promotion had been placed in a withhold status because of his nonselection for reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00011
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00011 INDEX CODE: 110.03, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Her pay records be corrected to show that on 1 Sep 99 she was authorized payment of $1,395.92 and that she was relieved of her indebtedness. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...