Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01006
Original file (BC-2005-01006.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01006
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED: NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  25 SEP 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the  Vietnam  Service  Medal  (VSM)  for  service  in
Thailand.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not know that he was authorized the  award.   He  states  he
flew on B-52 missions  over  Vietnam  while  flying  out  of  Guam,
Thailand, and Okinawa.

In support of his  appeal,  applicant  submitted  a  letter,  dated
7 Feb 05; a copy of DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United  States
Report of Transfer or Discharge, dated  11  Aug  70;  copy  of  VSM
criteria, and an extract from the internet on  Westover  Air  Force
Base.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served in the  Regular  Air  Force  from  12  Aug  66  to
11 Aug 70.   His   highest   grade   held   was   sergeant   (E-4).
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report  of  Transfer
or Discharge, Item 22c, reflects  six  months  and  eight  days  of
foreign service.

He was awarded the National Defense Service Medal.

___________________________________________________________________





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP reviewed this  application  and  recommended  denial,
stating, in part, that there were no  documents  that  confirm  any
flights over Vietnam or any evidence the applicant was on temporary
duty (TDY) or assigned to Thailand.  His records show  he  was  TDY
for 188 days to Okinawa in 1967.  However, there  was  no  evidence
that verifies any TDY to Thailand while he was TDY to Okinawa.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 20 May 05 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error  or  injustice.   In  the  absence  of  evidence
substantiating applicant’s duty in Vietnam, we  find  no  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2005-01006 in Executive Session  on  13  July  2005,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
      Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Member
      Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Mar 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 13 May 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 05.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01747

    Original file (BC-2005-01747.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01747 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 NOV 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) with two Oak Leaf Clusters (OLCs) and Vietnam service awards. A complete copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02660

    Original file (BC-2005-02660.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We are not ungrateful or unappreciative of his service to this nation; however, absent the presence of official documentation showing that he served in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant's request cannot be favorably considered. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02780

    Original file (BC-2005-02780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02780 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for service in Vietnam, award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for service in Vietnam in Oct 69 and award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02889

    Original file (BC 2014 02889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02889 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam (administratively resolved), Thailand, Okinawa, and Europe. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067

    Original file (BC-2011-03067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02775

    Original file (BC-2008-02775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either an error or an injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 10 Sep 08. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...