THIRD ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618-3
INDEX CODE: 110.03
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL:
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non-
Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than
22 October 2004.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 28 March 2005, the applicant's request that his records be corrected to
show he was assigned to the NNRPS on 1 May 2001, rather than 22 October
2004, was considered and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the
facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of
Proceedings at Exhibit F.
On 22 May 2005, the applicant submitted additional supporting documentation
for reconsideration. In his request, he provided a personal statement, a
copy of an email from the Air Force Doctrine Center (AFDC) informing him of
the status of his assignment to the AFDC, a letter from the Air Force
Information Warfare Center (AFIWC), a letter from the AFDC on the Status of
Hiring, and a series of emails to the Air Reserve Personnel Center.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.
On 19 July 2005, the Board reconsidered the applicant’s request and again
denied his application for correction of military records. For an
accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
request, and the rationale of the decision by the Board, see the Addendum
to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H.
On 27 August 2005, the applicant submitted additional supporting
documentation for reconsideration. In his request, he provided a personal
statement, a matrix, which separates what he believe are factors and time-
line sequences, Air Force Manual 36-8001, Reserve Personnel Participation
and Training Procedures, Second Deferral
for Promotion Memorandum, and a series of emails.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit I.
On 13 December 2005, the Board reconsidered the applicant’s request and
again denied his application for correction of military records. For an
accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
request, and the rationale for the decision by the Board, see the Second
Addendum to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit J.
On 21 December 2005, the applicant submitted additional supporting
documentation for reconsideration. In his request, the applicant states
the office of primary responsibility incorrectly addressed the previous
evidence he provided. The applicant states documentation he provided
affirms he should have been assigned to the NNRPS on 1 May 2001.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit K.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the additional evidence provided
in support of his appeal, it remains our opinion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In further support of his appeal
the applicant provided documentation, which appears to be asserting the
previously submitted evidence he provided and the evidence of record were
incorrectly addressed by the OPR. His contentions are duly noted; however,
the Board agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopts its original rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Having reconsidered all the matters before us once
again, it remains our opinion that the applicant has not provided evidence
that would persuade the Board that the actions taken by the Air Force
Reserve were inappropriate, not in accordance with governing regulations,
or that he was denied rights to which he was entitled. Therefore, it
remains our opinion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-03618
in Executive Session on 8 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit J. Second Addendum to Record of Proceedings,
dated 13 Dec 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit K. Applicant's Submission, dated 15 Dec 05, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 19 July 2005, the Board reconsidered the applicant’s request and again denied his application for correction of military records. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, it remains our opinion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non- Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than 22 October 2004. The Board also notes the applicant did not perform any...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00944-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. On 8 September 2006, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration (Exhibit I), as the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit had provided a decision in the aforementioned case (Exhibit J). JAA provided an advisory on 19 September 2006 that recommended denial of the applicant’s reconsideration...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00540-2
On 23 June 2004, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered and denied the applicant’s request to be awarded the LOM. JAA opines that the applicant’s statement that his former commander was not impartial or was biased because the applicant was a member of the Air Force Reserves is likewise specious at best because there is no evidence to make such a conclusion. JAA concludes they do not believe the Board must reconsider the applicant’s petition based on his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02099-3
On 2 Jul 03, the Board reconsidered and again denied the applicant’s appeal (See Addendum Record of Proceedings at Exhibit O). Rather, she was discharged because she was denied reenlistment. Exhibit P. Letter, Applicant, dated 17 Jan 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2000-00012-3
The Second Addendum to the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit W. In his most recent request for reconsideration, applicant contends he should not have been assigned to the Non-participating Ready Reserve Section (NNRPS) in January 1998. At the time he was assigned to NNRPS, he was and still is not qualified for worldwide duty in accordance with ARPC/SGPA memorandum dated 21 May 97. After careful consideration of the applicant's submission it is our opinion that the Air Force Reserve...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01103-2
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS On 21 February 2006, the Board considered and denied his request but because of ongoing litigation (Doe v. Rumsfeld) surrounding the Anthrax Vaccination Program (AVIP) the Board provided a caveat that should the plaintiffs in the aforementioned case prevail against the Secretary of Defense, the Board would reconsider the applicant’s request. After careful and deliberate review of the HQ USAF/JAA advisory...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | bc-2004-03796-4
The applicant’s complete submissions, with attachment, are at Exhibits L through N. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted by the applicant and the evidence of record, a majority of the Board does do not believe he has overcome the rationale expressed in the Board’s previous decision. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, a majority of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-1990-01998
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1990-01998 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to an active duty position with the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 17 July 1991, that part of the applicant’s original request...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1997-03571A
_______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRRP recommends the application be denied. DPPRRP states that a prudent individual would be obligated to investigate the ramifications of entering into an SSB agreement prior to requesting an SSB in conjunction with early separation. As of this date, this office has not received a response.