Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02309
Original file (BC-2004-02309.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02309
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 Jan 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His   service-connected   medical   conditions,   sleep   apnea    syndrome,
degenerative arthritis (lumbar spine), traumatic arthritis (left  and  right
knee), and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order  to  qualify
for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His injuries were  incurred  under  conditions  simulating  war.   While  on
active duty he participated in war games under  conditions  simulating  war.
During the  medical  "red  flags"  and  Combat  Medical  Readiness  Training
sessions the conditions under which they were conducted  simulated  war  and
required both mental and physical stress.  During chemical defense  training
he fell, tripped, tumbled, was fallen upon, ran  into  things  and  was  run
into during these simulated combat  conditions.   He  seldom  complained  of
pain unless it hindered him.  He would go days and  sometimes  weeks  before
he sought  medical  attention.   During  his  repeated  medical  visits  and
therapy sessions, physicians were mainly interested in treating  his  pains,
not how they came to be.  If he did say how they were incurred, it  was  not
always noted.

In  support  of  his  request,  applicant  provided  a  personal  statement,
documentation  associated  with  his  CRSC  application,  and  documentation
extracted  from  his  medical  records.   His  complete   submission,   with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  20
Jul 82.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  May  98.
He served as a Diet Therapy Craftsman.  He voluntarily retired from the  Air
Force on 31 Mar 04, having served 21 years, 8 months, and 11 days on  active
duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 7 Jul 04 based upon  the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records  show  his  sleep  apnea  syndrome,  degenerative  arthritis
(lumbar  spine),  traumatic   arthritis   (left   and   right   knee),   and
hypertension, are not combat related.  His records do  not  show,  while  in
service, a combat-related event or events that were the direct cause of  his
disabilities.  Sleep apnea is not a  combat  related  disability.   For  his
degenerative arthritis and traumatic arthritis  to  qualify  for  CRSC  they
would have to be linked specifically to an event which was  combat  related.
There are numerous entries in his service medical records, but  no  specific
mention of  how  he  incurred  the  injuries.   Although  stress  can  be  a
contributing factor to heart disease, hypertension cannot  be  approved  for
CRSC based on stress alone.  For hypertension to qualify for CRSC,  it  must
be secondary to Agent Orange contracted diabetes mellitus or presumptive  to
POW internment and so stated in the applicable rating decision.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  8  Oct
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
02309 in Executive Session on 26 Jul 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. Christopher Carey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Jul 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 1 Oct 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00250

    Original file (BC-2004-00250.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00250 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated Mandatory Case Completion Date: 30 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertensive heart disease, knee prosthesis, degenerative arthritis, and traumatic arthritis, be assessed as combat related in order to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02251

    Original file (BC-2004-02251.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02251 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes, degenerative arthritis, hypertension, and pancretitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02061

    Original file (BC-2004-02061.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 22 Mar 04 based upon the fact that evidence provided did not show his service-connected medical conditions were combat-related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02060

    Original file (BC-2004-02060.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His injuries were incurred when he fell off a ladder entering a B-29 aircraft. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his degenerative arthritis and limited motion of arm are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01299

    Original file (BC-2005-01299.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01299 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of the knees, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02790

    Original file (BC-2003-02790.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02790 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of both hips, hearing loss, and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02817

    Original file (BC-2004-02817.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 29 Dec 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Dec 04 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01318

    Original file (BC-2005-01318.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement. He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 30 Jun 95, having served 20 years and 13 days on active duty. Therefore, CRSC cannot be considered until the DVA recognizes the condition as service-connected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01982

    Original file (BC-2004-01982.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01982 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Feb 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes mellitus, Meniere's syndrome, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, cervical spine and left knee, inflammation of the iris,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03204

    Original file (BC-2004-03204.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his traumatic arthritis, hypertension, and dermatophytosis are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Nov 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...