Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01505
Original file (BC-2004-01505.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01505
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  11 Nov 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical conditions, lumbar  disc  disease,  impairment
of sphincter control, loss  of  use  of  both  feet,  neurologenic  bladder,
kidney trauma, and cervical disc disease, be assessed as combat  related  in
order  to  qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat  Related   Special
Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His back and left hip injures were incurred  while  assigned  to  Taiwan  in
1958, when a crane operator accidentally dropped a 400lb container  on  him.
In January 1965, while stationed in Vietnam and in a  bunker  during  a  "VC
alert," an individual threw a volleyball into the  bunker  and  jumped  feet
first on top of him, striking him on top of  his  right  shoulder  with  his
elbow and knocking his head against a post.   He  was  treated  for  a  torn
rotary cuff and shoulder muscle along with a hairline fracture in his  neck.
 During his tour in Vietnam he was exposed  to  weekly  sprayings  of  Agent
Orange.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application  and  documentation  extracted  from  his  medical  and
Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA)  records.   His  complete  submission,
with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  24
Sep 53.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Sep  71.
He served as an  Aerospace  Control  and  Warning  Systems  Technician.   He
voluntarily retired from the Air Force  on  30  Sep  78,  having  served  24
years, 2 months, and 13 days on active duty.

Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 100% for  his
unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application  was  approved  for  major  depressive  disorder  (post
traumatic stress disorder), rated at 50%.   His  remaining  conditions  were
disapproved  based  upon  the  fact  that  his   service-connected   medical
conditions were determined not to be combat-related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show  his  lumbar  disc  disease,  impairment  of  sphincter
control, loss of use of both feet, neurologenic bladder, kidney trauma,  and
cervical disc disease are not combat related.  His records show  he  injured
his back when an S-80 shelter box  fell  on  him.    He  claims  his  kidney
trauma was caused by this same  event.   This  event  is  not  considered  a
combat related event.  In addition,  his  loss  of  use  of  both  feet  are
secondary to his back condition based upon DVA  records.   His  DVA  records
state the impairment of sphincter control was established as related to  the
disability of appendectomy, which is not a combat related event.  He  claims
his neurologenic bladder  was  caused  by  Agent  Orange.   This  is  not  a
condition currently recognized as presumptive to Agent Orange.   He  claimed
his cervical disc disease, a torn rotary cuff, and  shoulder  muscle  injury
were caused during a VC alert when an individual jumped into his bunker  and
landed on him.  His records contain an entry dated 18 Mar  65,  which  shows
he injured his shoulder while playing volleyball on 23  Feb  65.   A  sports
activity is not considered a combat related event.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  1  Jun
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01505 in Executive Session on 1 Jun 05, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 May 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 23 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jun 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03573

    Original file (BC-2003-03573.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03573 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, duodenal ulcer, spinal disc condition, residuals of right and left foot injury, limited motion in cervical spine, varicose veins of right...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03631

    Original file (BC-2003-03631.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was treated for Spinal Disc Conditions and it was determined by Physical Evaluation Board that it was the result of his jumping dating back to 1953. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00805

    Original file (BC-2004-00805.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his records show he was treated for both myalgic myopathy of unknown origin and peripheral neuropathy. In 1994, he received a brief from the DVA stating that his peripheral neuropathy was added to the list of conditions related to Agent Orange. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00390

    Original file (BC-2005-00390.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. However, evidence has not been provided which would show that any of his conditions were awarded service-connection based on presumption of radiation exposure as required for a combat-related determination. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02060

    Original file (BC-2004-02060.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His injuries were incurred when he fell off a ladder entering a B-29 aircraft. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his degenerative arthritis and limited motion of arm are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03225

    Original file (BC-2004-03225.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 26 years, 6 months, and 27 days on active duty His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 Nov 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his ejection was in 1959, not 1968 as stated by DPPD. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02547

    Original file (BC-2004-02547.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02547 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, dermatophytosis, flat foot condition, and residuals of cold injury (both feet), be assessed as combat related in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01229

    Original file (BC-2008-01229.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01229 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, intervertebral disc syndrome, hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and peripheral vascular disease (right and left legs), be assessed as combat-related in order...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00508

    Original file (BC-2005-00508.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. There is no information to confirm he incurred injuries to his shoulders while performing combat related duties. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03362

    Original file (BC-2008-03362.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because he did not seek medical attention, documentation of lower back injuries does not exist. His CRSC application was disapproved on 27 March 2006 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat-related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied...