Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02038
Original file (BC-2004-02038.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02038
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 Dec 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical conditions, anxiety disorder and  spinal  disc
condition,  be  assessed  as  combat  related  in  order  to   qualify   for
compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While on a  combat  alert  at  Ramstein  AB,  Germany  during  a  period  of
terrorist activity, he was responding to an alert and dropping off  a  truck
loaded with combat gear.  He jumped off the truck and slipped on  some  ice,
hurting his tailbone.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application.  His complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  21
Jun 71.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Sep  80.
He served as an Administration Technician and a Recruiter.   He  voluntarily
retired from the Air Force on 31 Jul 91, having served 20 years and 20  days
on active duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 100% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 21 Apr 04 based upon the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show his anxiety disorder and spinal disc condition are  not
combat related.  Injuries sustained  by  jumping  off  a  military  vehicle,
where the fall/injury was not caused by the device itself is not  considered
eligible for CRSC.  There is no evidence  his  anxiety  disorder  is  combat
related.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant   responded   and   noted   several    entries    for    unrelated
injuries/illnesses were absent from his medical records.   He  states  after
his fall the physicians claimed he had just  sprained  his  spine.   He  was
given pain medication and assigned duties away from guard duties.

His complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
02038 in Executive Session on 11 Jul 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Jun 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 16 Sep 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, not dated.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02706

    Original file (BC-2004-02706.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his spinal disc condition and knee prosthesis are not combat related. Medical documentation dated 6 Mar 57, states his injuries were incurred when he jumped off a truck. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03641

    Original file (BC-2003-03641.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having reviewed his medical and personnel records, and documents supporting the aircraft accident it appears that his injuries are not considered to be eligible for CRSC. In support of his submission, applicant provided a personal statement, documents extracted from his medical records, and a document associated with his CRSC application. The applicant requests changes be made to his 12 Jan 61 Aircraft Accident Report.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03841

    Original file (BC-2003-03841.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his previous CRSC determination. There is no record of any particular injury received while handling munitions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01505

    Original file (BC-2004-01505.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01505 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Nov 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, lumbar disc disease, impairment of sphincter control, loss of use of both feet, neurologenic bladder, kidney trauma, and cervical disc disease, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02052

    Original file (BC-2004-02052.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02052 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03573

    Original file (BC-2003-03573.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03573 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, duodenal ulcer, spinal disc condition, residuals of right and left foot injury, limited motion in cervical spine, varicose veins of right...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02461

    Original file (BC-2004-02461.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02461 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, intervertegral disc syndrome, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00169

    Original file (BC-2005-00169.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00169 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hypertension, spinal disc condition, and bilateral knee conditions, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02861

    Original file (BC-2003-02861.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aerial flight is listed as hazardous service, this, his injury which occurred while performing required aircrew duties while onboard an aircraft, qualifies under the "engagement in hazardous service" for CRSC determination. The Medical Consultant states practice aircraft ground egress is not considered aerial flight and does not qualify as hazardous duty for purposes of CRSC eligibility. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03103

    Original file (BC-2003-03103.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The fact that a member may incur a medical condition during a period of war or while performing combat operations is not sufficient evidence to support a combat-related determination. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 20 Jan 04.