Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02637
Original file (BC-2005-02637.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02637
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  26 Feb 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be  assessed
as combat related in order to qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat
Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His injury was incurred unloading an M17 decontamination unit from  a  truck
during a war exercise.

In support of his request,  applicant  provided  a  personal  statement  and
documentation  associated  with  his   CRSC   application.    His   complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  14
May 69.  He was progressively promoted to the grade of  technical  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Oct  83.
He served as an Aircraft Structural Maintenance Technician.

An MEB was convened on 26 Nov 89  and  referred  his  case  to  an  Informal
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) with diagnoses of posterior  spinal  fusion
and myofascial syndrome.  The IPEB recommended that  he  be  placed  on  the
Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a combined compensable  rating
of 60%.  The applicant did not  agree  with  the  findings  and  recommended
disposition of  the  IPEB.   On  22  Jan  90,  a  Formal  PEB  convened  and
recommended he be placed on the TDRL for his status post spinal fusion  with
a combined compensable rating of 100%.  He was placed on the TDRL on 10  May
90.  On % Mar 92, he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired  with
a compensable rating of 100%.  He served 20 years, 11 months,  and  27  days
on active duty

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Aug 04 and 19 Sep 05  based  upon
the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not  to
be combat-related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states  his  records  show  he  initially
injured  his  back  several  years  prior  to  being  stationed  in  Turkey.
However, the issue  at  hand  is  whether  or  not  the  act  of  lifting  a
decontamination unit is considered combat  related.   Lifting  injuries  are
not unique to  military  service  or  to  combat  situations,  and  although
military duties can be strenuous, injuries from routine activities, such  as
lifting equipment, are not sufficient to be considered combat related,  even
when  the  event  occurs  while  performing  military  duties  or   military
training.  An exception would be if some combat related event was  occurring
at the same time which caused or aggravated the injury.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  4  Nov
05 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred  as  the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the
performance  of  duty  under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through   an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2005-
02637 in Executive Session on 28 Feb 06, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Aug 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 25 Oct 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02461

    Original file (BC-2004-02461.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02461 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, intervertegral disc syndrome, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00236

    Original file (BC-2004-00236.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00236 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, back strain, spinal disc condition, and hemorrhoids, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 10 Jul...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01241

    Original file (BC-2004-01241.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Jun 87, the Air Force PEB recommended he be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 40%. His records show documented evidence that he had complained of back pain as early as 1963, two years prior to being in Thailand. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterates his account of the incident in which he was injured, provides...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01541

    Original file (BC-2005-01541.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Sep 88, the IPEB recommended that the applicant be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 100%. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant recounts his previous contentions and requested his case be administratively closed (see Exhibit E). Based upon a review of the available evidence of record and the documentation provided in support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02604

    Original file (BC-2004-02604.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02604 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00302

    Original file (BC-2005-00302.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 23 Feb 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his spinal disc condition is not combat related. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00535

    Original file (BC-2005-00535.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. Applicant agrees he had other back injuries during his career, the injury in question in the one he received in Vietnam lifting sand bags. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01017

    Original file (BC-2005-01017.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03824

    Original file (BC-2003-03824.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his injuries occurred during training operations and according to CRSC criteria he is eligible for compensation since the injuries were incurred during an ORI and while deployed to Egypt to participate in Operation Accurate Test. The Medical Consultant states the fact that a member incurred a disability during a period of war or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00508

    Original file (BC-2005-00508.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. There is no information to confirm he incurred injuries to his shoulders while performing combat related duties. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...