RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04303
INDEX CODE: 128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Recoupment of a portion of her Health Profession Scholarship Program
(HPSP) debt be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Force’s decision to disqualify her from HPSP because of her
depression meant that medical school was beyond her financial
capabilities. The initial action, taken by the Air Force, in
disqualifying her from the scholarship program required her to drop
out of medical school and resign her commission. Due to the initial
action of the Air Force, she feels she should not be fully responsible
for the repayment of the outstanding balance of her account. She
accepts partial responsibility; however, she believes that her
$4,300.00 repayment serves as an adequate penalty. She feels she
honorably served the Air Force from 20 June 1996 through 24 November
1999; therefore, the Air Force should forgive the outstanding balance.
At a minimum, she asks that the Air Force reduce the repayment amount
of the educational expenses.
In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement,
with copies of medical statements, notifications of her medical
disqualification by HQ AETC/SGPS and withdrawal from HPSP by AFIT/CC,
financial statements of her debt, notification of her discharge and
discharge certificate, congressional correspondence, and additional
documents associated with the issues cited in her contentions. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 June 1996, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant,
Medical Service Corps (MSC), Reserve of the Air Force. She signed an
FY96 Armed Forces Health Profession Scholarship and Financial
Assistance Program(AFHPS/FAP) contract on 20 June 1996. While
attending medical school she was treated for major depression and then
took a leave of absence for medical reasons.
On 14 April 1998, HQ AETC/SGPS determined the applicant was not
medically qualified to continue in the AFHPS/FAP because of the
diagnosis of major depression, and recommended disenrollment from
AFHPSP. On 16 June 1999, HQ ARPC/JA determined the medical
disqualification recommendation was legally insufficient. However, JA
recommended the applicant be involuntarily discharged for voluntarily
withdrawing from medical school without prior permission from the Air
Force, with recoupment of educational funds. Discharge action was
initiated and, on 27 July 1999, the applicant acknowledged receipt of
the discharge notification. On 30 August 1999, she submitted her
tender of resignation in lieu of involuntary discharge and was
represented by counsel. On 19 November 1999, the applicant’s 30
August 1999 resignation was accepted by the Secretary of the Air Force
Personnel Council (SAFPC). It was further determined that she was
required to reimburse the United States Government the funds expended
on her AFHPS/FAP education and any other indebtedness to the United
States Government. Effective 24 November 1999, the applicant was
relieved from her assignment and honorably discharged from all
appointments in the Air Force in the grade of second lieutenant,
USAFR.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPAME recommends the application be denied. DPAME states that
the applicant was sponsored through AFHPSP to attend the Columbia
School of Medicine, University of MO, from 1 August 1996 to 14 April
1998 (leave of absence from 11 April to 31 December 1997), resulting
in a two-year active duty service commitment. On 30 August 1999, the
applicant signed and agreed to the terms of the resignation concerning
recoupment. DPAME states that the applicant signed her AFHPSP
contract, thereby agreeing to the terms of the contract and should be
required to reimburse the government as directed. The HQ AFPC/DPAME
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicates the basis of
her claim rests in the fact that she relied on information she
received in 1997 from the Air Force and her commanding officer that
she would be discharged because of her depression. As she had been
told she would be discharged as well as lose her scholarship, she and
her mental health professional decided that remaining in medical
school would further her depression and it would be best for her
mental health if she left medical school. It was only after she
informed the Air Force of her decision to drop out of medical school
that she was told she could not be discharged for depression and that
the information and guidance she received from her superior officer
was erroneous. Therefore, at the time she dropped out of medical
school, she was acting based on this incorrect information and not
independent of it as the advisory writer implies. The applicant’s
complete submission is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case.
However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
her burden that she has suffered either an error or an injustice. We
note that, when the applicant signed the Armed Forces Health
Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) contract in 1996, she agreed
to the terms of the contract, which specified the conditions for
reimbursement to the US Government. Additionally, we note that, after
consulting with legal counsel, she chose to submit her resignation in
lieu of involuntary discharge, agreeing to the terms of the
resignation concerning recoupment of any or all of the educational
assistance. We note the applicant’s assertion that she was provided
misleading information upon which she based her decision to tender her
resignation. However, other than her own assertions, she has provided
no documentary evidence supporting this claim or showing that her
superiors abused their authority when the recommendation for her
involuntary discharge was approved. Based on the applicant’s decision
to submit her resignation, she incurred an indebtedness for funds
expended on her AFHPSP education. In view of the foregoing and in the
absence of evidence by the applicant showing that the decision to
recoup the debt for her sponsorship in the HPSP was erroneous or
unjust, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 29 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-04303.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Dec 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAME, dated 28 Jan 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Feb 04.
Exhibit E. Letter from Applicant, dated 2 Mar 04.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Physician Education Branch, HQ AFPC/DPAME, reviewed this application and states that applicant signed her Health Professions Scholarship Program Contract (HPSP), thereby agreeing to the terms of the contract. Thus, by reports or physical examination required by the service, with results known to the service, the service in 1987 and again in 1989 knew of applicant’s endometriosis and further...
a, second sentence: “I will enter graduate professional education, as selected and directed by the Air Force, immediately following graduation from medical school.”) The recruiter, who was in his first year as a Health Professions Scholarships Program (HPSP) recruiter, was unable to answer whether [the applicant] would have a free selection of a specialty option without influence by the Air Force. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
While there is no disputing the fact that the applicant did accrue a debt to the government for his education, the Board majority noted that his wife suffers from recurrent major clinical depression, he has two children, over $100,000 in debts, and he has been supporting his family on a reduced income. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03351
Whether the applicant’s symptoms in the months prior to entering active duty were of such character or severity that would have warranted reporting by the applicant cannot be clearly determined from the available evidence, but evidence does suggest that onset of clinically significant symptoms occurred following entry onto active duty. Upon this review, the Board will find that absolutely no evidence of any mental health conditions existed prior to signing the AFHPSP contact on August 29,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00438
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00438 INDEX CODE: 128.10 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 AUGUST 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her discharge from the Air Force be reversed and she be allowed to enter an active duty Diagnostic Radiology residency training program in July 2005; or in the alternative,...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00904
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The SAF/MRB (Legal Advisor) notes the DoD guidance, dated 18 Sep 07, clearly states “that where the inability to serve was due to medical conditions beyond the member’s control recoupment would not be sought.” Applicant’s case was considered in Jan 07 under the stricter guidance dated 8 Apr 05, but counsel argues that the Board should follow the Sep 07 guidance and find the Jan 07 decision...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00282
The record demonstrates that she has secured full time employment in the medical career field for which the Air Force funded her education and training. Under the contract HPSP reimbursement would be triggered if the applicant were unable to complete her medical education program or commence the period of ADSC, failed to meet applicable Air Force physical procurement standards, or was involuntarily separated because her retention was no longer clearly consistent with the interest of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00295
The applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, General Law Division, HQ USAF/JAG, noted that Section 2005 provides for recoupment if a member fails to complete the ADSC voluntarily or due to misconduct. On 14 Aug 01, DFAS-POCC/DE advised the applicant that, based on her placement on the TDRL, it was inappropriate at this time to recoup monies which might not be owed if...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03145
On 13 Jan 00, HQ ARPC/SGP advised the applicant that review of her physical exam was completed and entries identified a history of migraine headaches that could be disqualifying for military service. The applicant was selected for entry into active duty for an evaluation of this diagnosis to determine if a medically disqualifying condition existed. The transmittal letter also asked the applicant to provide the Board with a copy of her signed HPSP contract.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03145
On 13 Jan 00, HQ ARPC/SGP advised the applicant that review of her physical exam was completed and entries identified a history of migraine headaches that could be disqualifying for military service. The applicant was selected for entry into active duty for an evaluation of this diagnosis to determine if a medically disqualifying condition existed. The transmittal letter also asked the applicant to provide the Board with a copy of her signed HPSP contract.