RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04274
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The term “Personality Disorder” in item 28 on his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be removed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was inaccurately diagnosed with Personality Disorder. He believes
this inaccurate classification as well as the permanent stigma will
continually impact his life. He has realized through post-discharge
counseling and treatment that his issues were related to post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 February 1996, for a
period of six years.
The applicant failed to report to work on 17 and 18 February 1998 and
was referred to Mental Health for an evaluation.
The applicant underwent a Mental Health evaluation on 10 March 1998
and was diagnosed with a Major Depressive and Generalized Anxiety
Disorder which existed prior to service and Personality Disorder not
otherwise specified. The psychiatrist stated, “the applicant’s
depression combined with anxiety and personality disorder would effect
his interpersonal relationships and his duty performance and the
condition would be aggravated by his continued presence in the
military environment.” The psychiatrist recommended the applicant be
administratively discharged for conditions that interfered with
military service but his condition did not warrant referral into the
disability evaluation system.
On 5 April 1998, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent
to recommend him for discharge for conditions (mental disorder) that
interfered with military service. The basis for this action was that
the applicant was diagnosed as having Major Depressive Disorder,
Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Personality Disorder (Not Otherwise
Specified).
The commander advised the applicant of his right to consult legal
counsel and that legal counsel had been obtained to assist him; and to
submit statements in his own behalf, or waive the above rights.
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action
that the psychiatrist determined the applicant’s condition as chronic,
existing prior to active duty, and was so severe that it significantly
affected his ability to function in the military environment.
On 20 April 1998, a legal review was conducted which found the case to
be legally sufficient to support separation from the Air Force and
recommended the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge
without probation and rehabilitation.
On 27 April 1998, the convening authority directed the applicant be
discharged with service characterized as general.
On 5 May 1998, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air
Force for a Personality Disorder. He served 2 months, 2 months and 15
days of active service. He received an RE code of “2C” which means
"Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level
separation without service characterization.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant was
administratively discharged for conditions that interfered with
military service. The documentation provided by the applicant
confirms a history of depression existing prior to service to include
a suicide attempt. The July 1998 inpatient documentation showed the
applicant experienced cycling moods, impulsivity and poor coping
skills, that can be seen in both Bipolar and Personality Disorder.
The Medical Consultant further states there is insufficient evidence
to refute the diagnosis of the Air Force psychiatrist. The Medical
Consultant believes the processing of the applicant’s case was
equitable and in compliance with applicable Air Force directives. The
Medical Consultant recommends the requested relief be denied.
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is attached at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
26 May 2004, for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. After a careful review of
the applicant’s request, the available medical records, and the
evidence presented in support of his appeal, we are persuaded some
relief is warranted. In coming to this conclusion, we note the
applicant while on active duty served satisfactorily with an overall
rating of “4” on his enlisted performance reports. It is noted the
applicant, after duty hours, was a volunteer emergency medical
technician (EMT). While on duty as an EMT a fellow EMT was involved
in a deadly motor vehicle accident. The applicant was the EMT
responding to the motor vehicle accident and was the last one to see
the victim alive prior to the accident. The applicant contends the
loss of his coworker changed him forever. The Board notes the
applicant was previously treated for depression prior to entering
active duty but was apparently cleared for entry onto active duty,
therefore, we believe he has established reasonable doubt in his case
that the diagnosis of personality disorder may not have best suited
his situation. We believe it would be in the best interest of the
Air Force and the applicant to resolve this matter in his favor.
Therefore, it is the Board’s opinion that his records should be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 27 April 1998, he
was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Secretarial Authority, and issued a Separation Program Designator
(SPD) code of “KFF.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-04274 in Executive Session on 29 June 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Panel Chair
Ms. Marth J. Evans, Member
Mr. James E. Short, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Dec 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 12 May 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 May 04.
CATHLYNN B. SPARKS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-04274
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116) it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 27
April 1998, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Secretarial Authority, and issued a Separation Program Designator
(SPD) code of “KFF.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00620
The applicant did not have a severe mental disorder and was not considered mentally disordered. In his recommendation for discharge, the commander indicated he was recommending the applicant be discharged with an entry-level separation. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his separation; i.e., personality disorder, to be inaccurate.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02777
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that even though the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is listed as personality disorder, the applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for her entry-level separation, “Personality Disorder,” to be inappropriate. ROSCOE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00929 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her “2C” (Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge) reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one allowing reenlistment, and the narrative reason for her discharge be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Failure...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-02087 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 1 16), it is directed that: provisions of AFI 36-3208 by reason of “Secretarial Authority,” with separation code “KFF.” records of the Department of the Air Force relating to e...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03944
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that even though the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is listed as personality disorder, the applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder. The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the narrative reason for discharged should be changed to Secretarial Authority, but feels no change in the RE Code is warranted. Therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00261
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends changing the applicant's Separation Program Designator (SPD) code to accurately reflect his diagnosis of an Adjustment Disorder. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant partial relief by changing the narrative reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority, but with no change in his uncharacterized service...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03983
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03983 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and separation code be changed. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS concurs with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and recommends the applicant’s separation code...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03597
The reason why he separated from the Air Force was due to both his parents having medical problems. Individuals who develop an adjustment disorder due to the stress of the routine rigors of military service with or without concomitant personal issues are not suited for military service and are subject to administrative discharge by their commander. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was given an entry level separation after being diagnosed with an adjustment disorder.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02730
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and noted that the applicant was seen by mental health providers shortly after starting basic training and was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder which interfered with her military duties/training and she was discharged because of the medical condition interfering with her training. A complete copy of the DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and noted that the applicant was seen by mental health providers shortly after starting basic training and was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder which interfered with her military duties/training and she was discharged because of the medical condition interfering with her training. A complete copy of the DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...