Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03757
Original file (BC-2003-03757.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03757
            INDEX NUMBER:  131.00
            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her nonselection for promotion to the grade  of  major  by  the  CY02B
Central Major Selection Board be voided and she be  directly  promoted
to the grade of major.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was unfairly nonselected for promotion to the grade of  major  due
to her having a serious illness.

Her illness caused her not to  work  for  several  months.   When  she
received an officer performance report  (OPR)  covering  this  period,
there was a lack of accomplishments to document in the OPR.  She later
discovered that she should have been assigned to the patient squadron,
where an OPR would not have been required.

After release of the promotion board results, she was  initially  told
that she had been selected for promotion,  only  to  be  told  several
hours later that she had not been selected.

She  deserves  promotion.   Applicant  provides  an  overview  of  her
qualifications for promotion.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a clinical nurse serving on active duty in the  grade
of captain.  She has three nonselections to the grade of major by  the
CY02B, CY03A, and CY03B, Central Major Promotion Selection Boards.   A
review of the applicant’s last eight OPRs reflects overall ratings  of
“meets standards” (officers either meet or do not meet standards).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial of the applicant’s request.  They do  not
agree with the applicant’s  contentions  that  she  should  have  been
assigned  to  a  patient  squadron,  which  would  have  excluded  the
requirement for an OPR.  AFPC/DPPPO references  the  requirements  for
assignment to a patient squadron as specified  in  AFI  41-210.   They
conclude that the OPR rendered on the applicant during  the  timeframe
in question was appropriately rendered.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
26 Mar 04 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response
has not been received.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  Additionally, we note that the  applicant  has
not  provided  any  support  from  her  rating  chain  regarding   the
appropriateness  of  the  OPR  rendered  on  her  closing  5  Jun  02.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
03757 in Executive Session on 10 June 2004, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
      Ms. Deborah A. Erickson, Member
      Mr. Christopher D. Carey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Oct 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 22 Mar 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 04.




                                   BRENDA L. ROMINE
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00500

    Original file (BC-2004-00500.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE notes the rater is simply letting the applicant know that her assessment was what she intended it to be at the time and she has no valid reason to change her assessment four years later. Exhibit F. Letter, Counsel, dated 7 May 04. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-2004-00500 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00322

    Original file (BC-2004-00322.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By letter, dated 28 Apr 04, the applicant provided a response to the advisory opinions, reiterating the contested report is erroneous and unjust. It is the majority’s opinion that the statements from the rater and additional rater represent their retrospective judgments of the applicant’s performance which, in their view,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01114

    Original file (BC-2003-01114.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her overseas duty history was not on her OSB when the CY02B lieutenant colonel board met; however, her current duty has since been updated and does reflect completion of the overseas assignment to Turkey. The DPAMF2 evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. DPPPO states that completion of training courses are not reflected on OSBs; however, a training report filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) documented her attendance and completion of the course in 1991.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00601

    Original file (BC-2003-00601.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00601 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting revised Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRFs) for the CY01A (P0401A) and CY02B (P0402B) Central Major Selection Boards. Her CY02B PRF was written by the same squadron commander who...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03653

    Original file (BC-2003-03653.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03653 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 Dec 01 through 5 Sep 02 be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished OPR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01887

    Original file (BC-2003-01887.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    They recommend that the AFBCMR approve the applicant’s consideration for promotion by SSB for the CY02B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board with the JSCM he was awarded for the period 7 Feb 02 to 13 Jun 02 included in his OSR. They recommend that the OPR rendered for the period 29 Sep 01 through 28 Sep 02 not be included in the applicant’s OSR since the OPR was not required to be on file by the date the promotion board convened. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00680

    Original file (BC-2003-00680.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPPBR3 evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states that the applicant’s 15 June 1993 duty title entry was updated in the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) in March 2000, after he submitted a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, to correct this error. The instructions specifically state, “Officers will not be considered by a Special Selection Board if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00859

    Original file (BC-2004-00859.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00859 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be offered continuation to serve as a captain in the Air Force until she is eligible for retirement. In support of her request, applicant’s superior submitted a letter of recommendation for continuation. She is currently...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00693

    Original file (BC-2003-00693.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00693 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to major by a special selection board (SSB) for the Calendar Year (CY) 2002B Central Major Selection Board with the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03821

    Original file (BC-2003-03821.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that her PRF prepared for the CY03A board be replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to provide consideration for promotion to the grade of major by a Special...