RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03499
INDEX CODES: 123.08, 131.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the grade of airman first
class (A1C) (E-3) be changed from 16 Sep 03 to 13 Jul 01.
The lost time as a result of his confinement be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Because of his current DOR and date of separation (DOS), he will not
be able to hold the rank of A1C for 12 months. Therefore, he will be
ineligible to reenlist. If his DOR was 13 Jul 01, his time in the
grade of A1C would allow him to reenlist and proceed with his career
progression.
It has been one year and four months since he completed the Return to
Duty Program (RTDP) and he feels he has had a successful transition
back into the Air Force. Since his return to duty, he has used what
he learned about himself and others to help inform airmen of the
career and possible life-altering decisions one can make, creating
more of a situational awareness and a sense of pride in this calling
he holds so dear. He has provided statements which will attest to his
ability to impact and lead others, along with his intense desire to
continue his obligation as a servicemember.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided numerous
supportive statements, including a statement from his commander,
several of which were unsigned.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 16 Nov 01, the applicant was convicted by Summary Court-Martial
for, between 24 Mar 01 and 25 Mar 01, wrongfully using and possessing
a Schedule I controlled substance (mushrooms containing psilocyn
and/or psilocybin). He was sentenced to a reduction from the grade of
airman first class to airman basic and confinement for 20 days.
An AF Form 2098, Duty Status Change, indicates that from 16 Jan 02 to
25 Jul 02, the applicant was enrolled in the RTDP, which required him
to enter the Air Force Corrections System for the purpose of
rehabilitation.
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates
that the applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
airman first class, having been promoted to that grade on 16 Sep 03.
His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 12 Sep 00.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPWB indicated that they found no errors requiring corrective
action concerning the applicant’s current grade and DOR.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/JA recommended denial indicating that the applicant has not
denied commission of the offenses nor has he offered any other
evidence that would prove that he did not commit the offenses for
which he was convicted by a court-martial. On the contrary, one of
the requirements of the RTDP is that the airman accepts responsibility
for his crimes. The applicant also has not alleged any error in his
court-martial. He still has a valid conviction and sentence.
Likewise, he has cited no error or injustice in the computation of his
DOR or DOS or his reenlistment eligibility. The fact that he complete
the RTDP does not guarantee the applicant a lengthy Air Force career.
In AFPC/JA’s view, the applicant has not met the burden of proving an
error or injustice in his case, and his DOR should not be changed.
A complete copy of the AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
By application, dated 4 Feb 04, the applicant furnished a response
indicating that as a result of the RTDP, he has gained an unbelievable
amount of self-awareness, confidence, and focus into his future. He
believes his actions and the effects of the RTDP will not only impact
his future as an adult, but will also help him in becoming one of the
better leaders in the Air Force if given a chance. He reiterated that
he has made a successful transition back into the Air Force and has a
renewed commitment to serve. If allowed, he plans on making the Air
Force a career. However, no matter what decision the Board makes, he
will respect it. He does not believe he deserves a second chance, but
rather, he owes the Air Force and is indebted to the organization for
all it has given him. It would be an honor to be granted the
opportunity to serve again.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action. The
evidence of record indicates that the applicant was convicted by court-
martial of wrongfully using and possessing a Schedule I controlled
substance (mushrooms containing psilocyn and/or psilocybin) and was
reduced in grade from airman first class to airman basic. He was
subsequently enrolled in and successfully completed the RTDP. He now
requests that his DOR for promotion to the grade of airman first class
be changed to his original DOR of 13 Jul 01. He contends that because
of his DOS of 11 Sep 04, his current DOR of 16 Sep 03 will result in
his falling short of the 12-month time in grade (TIG) requirement to
be eligible to reenlist. Since the applicant was found guilty of the
use and possession of a controlled substance, and has not denied the
commission of the offenses, we are not inclined to recommend
corrective action that would result in his original DOR being
restored. However, in view of his successful completion of the RTDP,
his outstanding duty performance, and the support of his commander, we
are sufficiently persuaded that the applicant should be afforded
relief that would result in his eligibility for reenlistment.
Therefore, we believe a DOR in the grade of airman first class a year
after his conviction is proper and fitting relief. Accordingly, we
recommend that the applicant’s DOR in the grade of airman first class
be changed to 16 Nov 02.
4. We note the applicant’s request that the lost time due to his
confinement be waived. However, since it appears his commander may
waive this requirement, and because of the commander’s strong support
for the applicant, we believe he will waive the lost time in order for
the applicant to reenlist. Therefore, this portion of the applicant’s
appeal is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was promoted to
the grade of airman first class (E-3) effective and with a date of
rank of 16 Nov 02.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-03499 in Executive Session on 11 Feb 04, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, Member
Ms. Leslie E. Abbott, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 18 Nov 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/JA, dated 8 Jan 04, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Jan 04.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 04, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-03499
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
grade of airman first class (E-3) effective and with a date of rank of
16 Nov 02.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01781
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-01781 INDEX CODE 131.00, 105.01, 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank of senior airman (SRA) be restored so that he may continue his military career, having completed the Return to Duty Program (RTDP). He successfully completed the program in Jan 03 and was returned to duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00075
If the applicant had not been court-martialed and reduced to the grade of AB, he would have been promoted to the grade of SRA on 16 Feb 04, provided there were no ineligibility conditions and he had the recommendation of his commander. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB notes the applicant’s incorrect promotion to airman and A1C and provides details regarding the applicant’s promotion eligibility and the pertinent DORs based on various circumstances. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03396
She was returned to active duty on 23 Nov 03 in the grade of airman basic, with a DOR of 25 Mar 03. The applicant would not be eligible for promotion to airman until 8 Jan 05, airman first class until 8 Nov 05, and senior airman until 8 Mar 08. Completion of the RTDP does not even guarantee return to duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02856
Therefore, he was not eligible for promotion to airman until that date. He is granted a waiver and is eligible to reenlist in the Regular Air Force. He is granted a waiver and is eligible to reenlist in the Regular Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02493
Since the applicant was in confinement until 7 May 2003, he was not eligible for promotion to airman until 8 May 2003 (6 months’ TIG) and was eligible for promotion to A1C on 8 March 2004 (10 months’ TIG). We note that in his current grade of airman first class, he reaches his Expiration Term of Service on 8 December 2004 and must separate. Therefore, after weighing the evidence presented, we believe a more equitable remedy would be to provide the applicant the opportunity to reenlist with...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02003
On 27 Aug 02, the applicant's request that he be reinstated to the grade of staff sergeant was considered and partially granted by the Board. JA states his current commander is correct that AFI 35-205 does not prohibit Airmen from promotion consideration when they are returned to duty after completing the RTDP. The JA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His return to duty and suspended...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01741
The applicant’s performance reports and numerous awards are provided at Exhibit B. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB advises that, based on the applicant’s current and DOR of 9 Apr 03 for airman, the earliest cycle he would be eligible for promotion consideration to SSgt would be 07E5. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01642
DPPPWB states that, based on the Air Force Clemency and Review Board’s letter of 29 March 2004, remitting the applicant’s bad conduct discharge, MilPDS has been administratively corrected to reflect the applicant’s grade as airman (E-2), with an effective date and date of rank of 30 March 2004. The HQ AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00829
His request claims his progress since returning to active duty has not only benefited him, “but has also benefited the Air Force as well.” The applicant’s specific request is that he be immediately promoted to E-4, skipping the time and performance requirements for promotion to E-2, to E-3 and to E-4. He was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 6 November 2004, and an effective date of 17 June 2004. b. He was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02352 INDEX CODE: 123.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The period of his service that was considered “lost time” be restored to his period of active service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPWR evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/JA indicated that even though the evidence clearly supports...