RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02493
INDEX CODE: 131.04, 131.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His rank of airman first class (E-3) be restored with at least twenty
months of time-in-grade (TIG) and he be given a career job reservation
(CJR) so he may reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Force has allowed him to complete the Return-to-Duty Program
(RTDP). He is currently serving as a Health Services Management Apprentice
(4A031). He works in the patient administration and TRICARE and performs
at a noncommissioned officer level. Based on his current rank, he cannot
officially perform as a supervisor and leader although he possesses all of
the ability and training. Without approval of his requests, he will be
unable to reenlist, negating the value and intent of the RTDP.
In support of his request, applicant provides copies of character reference
letters and letters of support, copies of his Letters of Appreciation and
Certificates of Training, two copies of AF Form 77, Supplemental Evaluation
Sheet, for the periods ending 1 December 2001 and 11 January 2002 and a
unofficial copy of an Enlisted Performance Report. His submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant contracted his initial enlistment on 31 March 2000 for a
period of four years and was progressively promoted to the grade of A1C.
On 28 August 2002, the applicant was found guilty by general court-martial
for the wrongful use of cocaine and sentenced to confinement for 7 months,
reduction to the grade of airman basic, and forfeiture of $700 pay per
month for 7 months. Applicant was confined from 28 August 2002 through 7
May 2003.
The Military Personnel Database (MilPDS) reflects the applicant’s rank as
A1C (E-3) with a date of rank (DOR) and an effective date of 19 September
2004 (correction of DOR date recommended by AFPC/DPPPWB to 8 March 2004,
see Exhibit C). He has a date of separation of 8 December 2004.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPWB recommends denial. DPPPWB states that based on the applicant’s
DOR to AB (11 Sep 02), he would have been eligible for promotion to airman
on 11 Mar 03 and to A1C on 11 January 2004, if there were no ineligibility
factors and he was recommended by his commander. In accordance with AFI 36-
2502, Airman Promotion Program, table 1.1, rule 4, DPPPWB states he was
ineligible for promotion for a particular cycle when he was convicted by a
court-martial, or was undergoing punishment/suspended punishment imposed by
court-martial. Since the applicant was in confinement until 7 May 2003, he
was not eligible for promotion to airman until 8 May 2003 (6 months’ TIG)
and was eligible for promotion to A1C on 8 March 2004 (10 months’ TIG).
DPPPWB further states that the RTDP provides airmen an opportunity to be
returned to active duty and have a punitive discharge remitted; it does not
provide for restoration of rank. The DPPPWB evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states that in order to be considered
for a CJR and for reenlistment, the applicant must have held A1C for a
minimum of 12 months from his new date of rank. DPPAE further states that
the applicant will not have held A1C for at least 12 months as of his date
of separation of 8 December 2004. The AFC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit
D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant apologizes for his wrongful use of cocaine and hopes he can be
given the opportunity to continue to rebuild his career. Since his
release, he has done everything to prove his dependability by giving his
all. He has learned his lesson for the rest of his life. He requests the
Board consider the character statements, his letter of evaluation and his
EPR comments. He believes these documents depict an accurate picture of
who he is. If he is allowed to reenlist he will continue his hard work and
dedication to the Air Force. Applicant’s letter is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to warrant partial
relief in an exercise of clemency. The applicant requested that his rank
of airman first class (A1C) be restored with at least twenty months of time-
in-grade (TIG) and he be given a career job reservation (CJR) so he may
reenlist. We note that in his current grade of airman first class, he
reaches his Expiration Term of Service on 8 December 2004 and must
separate. However, if the applicant were restored with twenty months of
TIG, he would then become eligible for promotion to senior airman (E-4).
Therefore, granting his appeal would essentially remove the punishment of
grade reduction imposed by court-martial for his misconduct. We are aware
that the Return to Duty Program is extremely competitive and that
relatively few members such as the applicant are approved for entry in the
program. While not ignoring the seriousness of the offense of which the
applicant was convicted, we believe that his actions were due, in a large
part, to youthful immaturity. The Board took note that the applicant
completed the rigorous RTDP in March 2003 thereby completing his seven-
month confinement, and appears well on his way towards rehabilitation, as
evidenced by strong supporting statements. The applicant also takes full
responsibility for his misconduct and wants very much to continue in the
service. Therefore, after weighing the evidence presented, we believe a
more equitable remedy would be to provide the applicant the opportunity to
reenlist with appropriate waivers and to adjust his date of rank to A1C to
1 September 2003, which will allow the applicant sufficient time to attain
the grade of senior airman and a opportunity to continue his career and/or
attain continued grade progression while being an asset to the Air Force.
Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. His date of rank to the grade of Airman First Class (E-3) be
changed from 8 March 2004 to 1 September 2003.
b. On 30 November 2004, he requested a waiver of the grade
requirement and Career Job Reservation (CJR) to obtain eligibility for
reenlistment in the Regular Air Force and his requests were approved by
competent authority.
c. On 1 December 2004, he was honorably discharged and on 2
December 2004, he reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four
years.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 30 November 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-02493 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Aug 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 30 Aug 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 4 Oct 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Oct 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 1 Nov 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02493
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that:
a. His date of rank to the grade of Airman First Class (E-3)
be changed from 8 March 2004 to 1 September 2003.
b. On 30 November 2004, he requested a waiver of the grade
requirement and Career Job Reservation (CJR) to obtain eligibility for
reenlistment in the Regular Air Force and his requests were approved
by competent authority.
c. On 1 December 2004, he was honorably discharged and on
2 December 2004, he reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period
of four years.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00672
All that is required is that airmen returned to duty be allowed to serve at least one year before separation. He was promoted to the grade of senior airman, effective and with a date of rank of 27 March 2005. b. He was promoted to the grade of senior airman, effective and with a date of rank of 27 March 2005. b.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00075
If the applicant had not been court-martialed and reduced to the grade of AB, he would have been promoted to the grade of SRA on 16 Feb 04, provided there were no ineligibility conditions and he had the recommendation of his commander. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB notes the applicant’s incorrect promotion to airman and A1C and provides details regarding the applicant’s promotion eligibility and the pertinent DORs based on various circumstances. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03499
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03499 INDEX CODES: 123.08, 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the grade of airman first class (A1C) (E-3) be changed from 16 Sep 03 to 13 Jul 01. Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates that the applicant is...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01407
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01407 INDEX CODE: 133.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 AUGUST 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: A 23-month extension to his current enlistment and a Career Job Reservation (CJR) so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. In support of his request, the applicant submits a statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01781
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-01781 INDEX CODE 131.00, 105.01, 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank of senior airman (SRA) be restored so that he may continue his military career, having completed the Return to Duty Program (RTDP). He successfully completed the program in Jan 03 and was returned to duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00397 INDEX CODE: 133.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of airman first class (E-3) be reinstated, with his original date of rank (DOR) of 9 October 2000, and consideration for promotion to the grade of senior airman (E-4). The applicant is currently serving on active duty in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02856
Therefore, he was not eligible for promotion to airman until that date. He is granted a waiver and is eligible to reenlist in the Regular Air Force. He is granted a waiver and is eligible to reenlist in the Regular Air Force.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, indicates that the applicant will have sufficient time prior to his DOS to be promoted to A1C, provided he is otherwise eligible. A copy of the complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. The Staff Judge Advocate (SJA), HQ APFC/JA, asserts that the purpose of suspending the applicant’s BCD for one year was to ensure that the rehabilitative programs of the RTDP were successful. After a thorough review of the evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01642
DPPPWB states that, based on the Air Force Clemency and Review Board’s letter of 29 March 2004, remitting the applicant’s bad conduct discharge, MilPDS has been administratively corrected to reflect the applicant’s grade as airman (E-2), with an effective date and date of rank of 30 March 2004. The HQ AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03396
She was returned to active duty on 23 Nov 03 in the grade of airman basic, with a DOR of 25 Mar 03. The applicant would not be eligible for promotion to airman until 8 Jan 05, airman first class until 8 Nov 05, and senior airman until 8 Mar 08. Completion of the RTDP does not even guarantee return to duty.