RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: (BC-2003-00209)
INDEX NUMBER: 128.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The date of his retirement order, special order AC-023248, dated 20
Aug 02, be changed to 1 Jun 02 so that the Air Force will pay for his
final move upon leaving the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was briefed incorrect, inaccurate, and incomplete information
concerning his permanent change of station (PCS) and retirement moving
entitlements.
In order to relocate his family at government expense, he requested
retirement during Operation Stop Loss in order to generate an
entitlement. However, he was not able to retire because his career
field was impacted by “Stop Loss.” He attempted to complete a waiver
request but “Stop Loss” was lifted before he submitted the waiver.
He submitted his retirement papers a second time and was briefed
during the entire process by personnel at his Base traffic management
office (TMO) that the only way to move his family at government
expense was to use his retirement orders. He complied but was later
told he had to pay for shipping because his orders were dated after he
arranged to have his household goods moved.
He made hurried arrangements to ship his household goods due to the
desperate need to reunite his family in order to alleviate the severe
financial strain of two households. He also set up the move based on
the many briefings and assurances he was given that the move would be
paid for. The cost of the move $9,055.00 has placed a tremendous
financial hardship on he and his family.
He believes that requiring him to pay for the move is unjust because
the military would have paid for the move if he had his orders in
hand.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served on active duty from 11 May 81 through 31 Mar 03.
He retired in the grade of major.
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this case are contained in the
evaluation prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force found
at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The
applicant chose to move his family and household goods due to the
implementation of Stop Loss in Sep 01; all utilization of retirement
orders entitlements was suspended unless one of the following criteria
was met:
a. Individual was exempted from Stop Loss.
b. A HHG or Stop Loss waiver was approved.
Applicant contends he was in the process of applying for a Stop Loss
waiver, but his AFSC was removed from Stop Loss prior to submission of
the actual waiver. The Military Personnel Flight (MPF) briefed the
applicant that the government would not reimburse him for his move due
to the fact that he did not have retirement orders in hand prior to
movement of his household goods.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant requested
an additional 60 days to make his case to the Board. He stated that
he had some additional information that the Board should take into
account before making its decision. He also submitted a letter of
support from his group commander.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E.
In response to the applicant’s request, the AFBCMR advised him on 24
Mar 03 that it could not grant the additional 60 days he requested.
However, he was advised that he could request temporary withdrawal of
his application and that he should respond in writing within 15 days
as to his desire. To date, further response has not been received
from the applicant.
The AFBCMR response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The Board notes that Operation Stop
Loss precluded the applicant from using his entitlement to move his
family and household goods, an entitlement that he still has not used.
Although there may be some doubt as to the applicant’s efforts to
obtain a waiver, the Board finds it reasonable under the special
circumstances of Operation Stop Loss that the applicant was unable to
process his waiver request before the program ended. As such, the
Board believes that to deny the applicant an entitlement that he earned
after 20 years of honorable service and impose the hardship on him of
paying for the movement of his household goods is unusually harsh. The
Board does not believe that this is a fitting conclusion to a twenty-
year career and does in fact constitute an injustice. Therefore, in
the interest of equity and justice, the Board recommends that the
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority
approved his request for an Operation Stop Loss waiver, and that
Special Order No. AC-023248 was issued on 1 June 2002, rather than
20 August 2002.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
00209 in Executive Session on 4 Jun 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Marcia Jane Bachman, Member
Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 24 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Feb 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, 18 Mar 03.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Mar 03.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-00209
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show
that competent authority approved his request for an Operation Stop
Loss waiver, and that Special Order No. AC-023248 was issued on 1
June 2002, rather than 20 August 2002.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03629
Therefore, the applicant’s information was not updated in the promotion files and her records were not considered during the 02E8 promotion board. DPPRRP states that at the time the applicant withdrew her retirement, established procedures required the MPF to notify AFPC/DPPWB (promotions) when a member withdrew their retirement, making them eligible for promotion testing. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03436
He received a letter dated 29 Sep 06 stating the claim was denied because he was late submitting the DD Form 1840; consequently, the carrier did not receive the DD Form 1840 in the required amount of time. The claim files show the carrier provided the DD Form 1840 to the applicant at delivery and notified the applicant of the requirement to file timely notice. The claims examiner tried to determine why the applicant did not provide timely notice considering it is his third claim for HHGs...
d. Paragraph U-5330-G, JFTR provides, in part, for shipment of household goods in advance of orders, however, the Comptroller General has ruled that general information furnished to the member concerning issuance of orders before the determination is 2 AFBCMR 9 6 - 0 2 0 1 3 made to actually issue the orders (such as time of eventual release from active duty, time of expiration of term of service, date of eligibility for retirement, date of expected rotation from overseas duty) may not be...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02343 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His transportation entitlements be reinstated to allow a final move and shipment of his household goods (HHG). He completed 20 years of active service for retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02107
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because he applied for a Stop Loss waiver that was approved, he did not have enough time before his retirement date to use 10 remaining days of leave on his account. DPPRRP notes that the applicant only had 2 days from his Stop Loss waiver approval to his effective retirement date but states that the applicant had the opportunity to extend his retirement effective date up to 30 days and neglected to...
On 18 Apr 86, after consulting counsel, applicant offered a conditional waiver of his rights associated with an administrative discharge board hearing contingent on his receipt of no less than an honorable discharge. His military service was properly reviewed and appropriate action was taken (see Exhibit D). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper or contrary to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-03569
The applicant had less than 2 years TIG on her requested retirement date of 1 Aug 01 and did not qualify for the waiver to retire with two years TIG. If a waiver to the 3-year TIG requirement had existed on 1 Feb 03, her retired pay would still be the same. There is no difference in benefits accorded to her if retired in the grade of major or retired in the grade of Lt Col. HQ AFPC/DPPRRP’s evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02095
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered the Air Force on 5 September 1942 and was retired on 30 November 1964, in the grade of lieutenant colonel. We have carefully reviewed applicant's submission and the entire record, and we do not find a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely filing of this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2000-00074
He submitted a request for retirement in lieu of discharge and requested a hearing before an administrative discharge board. He was not discharged from the Air Force on 21 August 2000, but rather on that date he was continued on active duty. Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 29 Oct 03 ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MR SUBJECT: AFBCMR Case on I have carefully reviewed all of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02513
The applicant separated from the Air Force on 9 Sep 02 and had until 7 Mar 03 to travel at Government. He did not state any conditions that were beyond his control that prevented him from traveling within the authorized time limit. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...