RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03569
INDEX CODE: 131.00, 136.00
XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 MAY 2008
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The three-year time-in-grade (TIG) requirement for retirement as a
Lieutenant Colonel be waived.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Everything changed for her following the events of Sep 11; the Air
Force implemented a STOP LOSS program for the Nurse Corps and she
was going through a high-risk pregnancy, resulting in an emergency
delivery of her son. Her husband, an active duty U-2 pilot, was
frequently deployed and they became concerned over the likelihood
that she would be deployed as well. It was always her intention to
serve the three years TIG and retire as a Lt Col; however, her
family’s increased deployments coupled with an unpredictable STOP
LOSS policy forced her to make the difficult decisions that simply
had to be in the best interest of her son.
In support of her appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant entered active duty on 1 Feb 83 and had continuous
honorable service until her retirement of 1 Feb 03. She was
promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel with an effective date
and promotion service date of 1 Jun 00.
On 2 Aug 00, applicant applied for voluntary retirement with an
effective date of 1 Aug 01 under the Temporary Early Retirement Act
(TERA). At that time she had two months TIG as a Lt Col and would
have had 1 year and 2 months TIG on her requested retirement date.
Air Force Stop Loss Program delayed her retirement until 1 Feb 03,
at which time she had 2 years and 8 months TIG.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRRP reviewed this application and recommended denial.
On 2 Aug 00, the applicant applied for voluntary retirement on an
AF Form 1160, Military Retirement Actions (atch 1) for a retirement
date of 1 Aug 01 under TERA. At that time she had two months time-
in-grade (TIG) as a Lt Col and would have had 1 year and 2 months
TIG on her requested retirement date. Because she was affected by
STOP LOSS, her retirement date was delayed until 1 Feb 03 at which
time she had 2 years and 8 months TIG. She qualified for a 20-year
voluntary retirement on 1 Feb 03.
Public Law (PL) 105-261, 17 Oct 98, changed 10 USC §1370(a)(2)(A),
allowing the Secretary of Defense (SecDef) to authorize the
Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) to reduce TIG requirements to not
less than two years to retire in the grade of Lt Col for the period
of 1 Oct 90 to 30 Sep 01. The applicant had less than 2 years TIG
on her requested retirement date of 1 Aug 01 and did not qualify
for the waiver to retire with two years TIG. PL 106-398,
30 Oct 00, allowed the SecDef to authorize the SAF to waive the
3-year TIG requirement to not less than 2 years from 1 Oct 90 to
31 Dec 01. PL 107-314, 2 Dec 02, allowed the SecDef to authorize
the SAF to waive the 3-year TIG requirement to no less than 2 years
for the period of 1 Oct 02 to 31 Dec 03. PL 108-136, 24 Nov 03,
allowed the SecDef to waive the 3-year TIG requirement to no less
than 2 years.
The applicant retired on 1 Feb 03. Although she had 2 years and
8 months TIG as of her retirement date, the SecDef had not
authorized the SAF to exercise this authority and no force
reduction program existed at that time.
The applicant's Date Initially Entered Uniformed Service (DIEUS) is
30 Nov 82. As a consequence, her retired pay plan is High-36 under
10 USC Section 1407. Regardless of her retired grade, either major
or Lt Col, her retired pay is based upon the 50% of the average of
her basic pay for the 36-months prior to her 1 Feb 03 retirement
date. If a waiver to the 3-year TIG requirement had existed on
1 Feb 03, her retired pay would still be the same. There is no
difference in benefits accorded to her if retired in the grade of
major or retired in the grade of Lt Col.
HQ AFPC/DPPRRP’s evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states, she applied for voluntary retirement under TERA
on 2 Aug 00 based on a separate family issue which eventually
resolved itself. She requested her retirement under TERA paperwork
rescinded and the retirement was cancelled. Her retirement at
20 years was not affected by STOP LOSS and she served 20 years of
her own free will.
She realize there is no difference in the benefits as her
retirement plan is High-3; however, this is not a money issue. She
proudly wore the rank of Lt Col for 32 months and would have served
the mere four months gladly if she did not have a newborn to
consider.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case. Applicant contends that it was always her intentions to
serve the three-year TIG and retire in the grade of Lieutenant
Colonel. However, it appears she made a conscious decision to
retire early; a decision she acted upon after serving two months
time-in-grade as a lieutenant colonel. The Board is not
unsympathetic to the applicant’s dilemma of having to choose
between an early retirement in the retired grade of major and the
responsibilities that come with raising an infant while serving
during a time of war. However, since the Secretary of Defense has
not delegated waiver authority to the Secretary of the Air Force,
we lack the authority to grant her stated request even if we were
predisposed to do so. More significantly however, the applicant did
not lose any retirement pay. Accordingly, we find no compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-03569 in Executive Session on 1 February 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Mr. Don H. Kendrick, Member
Ms. Maureen B. Higgins, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Nov 06, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 5 Dec 06, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Dec 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Jan 07.
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01988 (Case 4) INDEX CODE: 136.01, 131.00, COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement grade of major be changed to lieutenant colonel and his retirement date of 1 Jul 95 be changed to 1 Jul 00, with recomputation of his 1405 service date to reflect he retired from active duty with 22 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02723
A complete copy of the advisory opinion is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL EVALUATION: The applicant asserts he is not applying for a TIG waiver under Section 1370(a)(2)(D) but that his retirement in the grade of LTC be approved under Section 1370(a)(2)(A) based on his more than two years of service in that grade; or, in the alternative, his DOR for LTC be changed to reflect three years TIG based on the equities...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01681
In a 4 Feb 00 appeal, he requested SSB consideration for the Fiscal Year 2000 (FY00) Air Force Reserve Colonel Promotion Selection Board, which convened on 18 Oct 99, and any subsequent Reserve Colonel Promotion Board for which he was not considered. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s previous appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit C. On 15 Jun 01, the applicant was notified that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | bc-2007-01927
Had she known she could have received a TERA retirement based on years of service, she would have taken that instead of appealing the decision of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) regarding her retirement at 30 percent disability. Had she been returned to duty on 21 Aug 94, instead of permanently retired, she still could have requested to retire under TERA not later than 1 Sep 94 under the FY94 Force Reduction Program, a later TERA program, or retire at 20 years TAFMS, her mandatory...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03507
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRRP states that Section 1370, Title 10, United States Code, paragraph (a)(2)(A) states: “In order to be eligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of this title in a grade above major or lieutenant commander, a commissioned officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps must have served on active duty in that grade for not less than three years, except that the Secretary of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01500
He was approved for Stop Loss payments from Apr 02 to 1 Oct 02 (his promotion date). On the date he was promoted, his AFSC was still on Stop Loss and he could not retire. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03929
Title 10, USC, Section 8911, requires a member to serve at least 20 years of active federal military service to be eligible for years of service retirement (see Exhibit F). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. HQ AFPC/DPPRRP notes the applicant had over 15 years of active service at the time of his discharge but was not eligible to submit an application for retirement under the early retirement program because his AFSC was excluded from consideration. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05077
Based upon the presumed sufficiency of the referral OPR as served, and insufficient evidence to support the allegations made by the applicant, they find that the referral comment mentioned in the applicant's contested report was appropriate, and as such there is no basis in which to support removal of the contested evaluation. After reviewing all of the evidence provided, we are not persuaded the applicants referral OPR should be expunged and her record be given Special Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03901
In a letter dated 18 Jan 06 (Exhibit C), HQ AFPC/DPAMF2 requested the applicant explain why she felt she should have been awarded the grade of captain when she entered active duty. The time between her commissioning as a lLT in the Air Force Reserve on 2 Nov 78 and when she entered active duty on 10 Jan 79 is not active service nor creditable as active service for retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Jan 06, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY1994 | BC 1994 02998
The AFBCMR issued AFBCMR Directive 94-02998 (Corrected Copy), dated 17 Jan 96, directing the two contested OPRs be declared void and removed from her records; her records be corrected to show she was not released from her AGR position on 12 Jul 91, but continued to serve until 11 May 94, at which point she would have attained 20 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS); on 12 May 94, she was released from her AGR tour and transferred to the Reserve; and, her corrected records...