Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02513
Original file (BC-2005-02513.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02513
            INDEX NUMBER:  128.00
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  None

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  No


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 Feb 07


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be  granted  a  waiver  of  the  180-day  time  limit  to  use  his
entitlement to travel and ship household  goods  (HHG)  at  government
expense from Japan to his home of record in the United States.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was placed on the “Stop Loss” list after the  events  of  9-11  and
experienced a series of events that constituted  a  hardship  to  him.
When “Stop Loss” ended and he was permitted to leave the military,  he
had already lost the job he had lined up and his stateside family  was
moving, leaving him  without  a  residence  to  return  to.   He  also
experienced a medical problem  with  his  knee.   The  combination  of
problems put him under a lot of stress.   During  this  time,  he  was
under the impression he did not have to use his  entitlement  to  move
until his time in the  Reserves  was  up,  the  summer  of  2005.   He
separated from the military and lived on the local  economy  in  Japan
until conditions were good for his return.   He  recently  decided  to
return to the States and upon contacting the traffic management office
(TMO) learned that he had misunderstood the timeframe  for  using  his
entitlement.

He believes that the circumstances at  the  time  of  his  separation,
e.g., the stress of “Stop Loss,” problems with his military pay, etc.,
were unique and warrant consideration for  allowing  him  to  use  his
entitlement to move back to the States at government expense.

In support of his application, the applicant provides a  copy  of  the
special  order  authorizing  his  separation  from  the  military  and
authority to relocate from Japan to his home of record.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty on 10 Dec 97 and was promoted up  to
the grade of senior airman (SrA) (E-4).  The applicant separated  from
the Air Force on 9 Aug 02.  Additional information pertaining to  this
application is contained in  the  advisory  opinion  prepared  by  the
appropriate Air  Force  Office  of  Primary  Responsibility  found  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

JPPSO-SAT/ECAF recommends denial of the applicant’s request.   At  the
time of his release from active duty, the applicant listed an  address
in Japan as his future  mailing  address,  indicating  his  intent  to
remain in Japan.  The applicant separated from the Air Force on 9  Sep
02 and had until 7 Mar 03 to travel at Government.  He did  not  state
any conditions that were beyond his control that  prevented  him  from
traveling within the authorized time limit.   A  previous  Comptroller
General decision  concluded  that  Congress  intended  to  retain  the
principle that the time limitation ensures travel  and  transportation
are related to are related to separation or retirement.   The  primary
requirement is that travel be the result  of  separation  (retirement)
from Service, since it is  not  a  benefit  that  the  retired  member
retains until used.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9
Sep 05 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a response has
not been received.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  Therefore, in the  absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2005-
02513 in Executive Session on 19 October 2005, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
      Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, JPPSO-SAT/ECAF, dated 30 Aug 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 05.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02292

    Original file (BC-2005-02292.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was reimbursed fully for his move from Seymour Johnson to his home of record, but not for his move from his home of record to the Academy. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AF/DPDFP recommends the applicant be reimbursed a total of $82.15 for the shipment of items from his home of record to the Academy. However, the Board agrees with the recommendation by HQ AF/DPDFP to reimburse the applicant in the amount of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03398

    Original file (BC-2004-03398.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03398 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The transportation charges in the amount of $3,802.36 to ship his automobile from Australia to Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB), Alabama, be waived. ECAF states that the applicant exhausted his POV...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02486

    Original file (BC-2005-02486.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    An extension of the time limit would apply only for the amount of time the member was confined in a medical facility or deemed to be unable to travel due to medical reasons that occurred during the first year. An extension of the time limit would apply only for the amount of time the member was confined in a medical facility or deemed to be unable to travel due to medical reasons that occurred during the first year. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01917

    Original file (BC-2005-01917.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, and extension may not be authorized/approved if it extends travel and transpiration allowances for more than 6 years from the date of separation or release from active duty or retirement unless a certified on-going medical condition prevents relocation of the member for longer than 6 years from the separation/retirement date. After carefully reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, it is our opinion the applicant should be entitled to transportation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02343

    Original file (BC-2006-02343.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02343 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His transportation entitlements be reinstated to allow a final move and shipment of his household goods (HHG). He completed 20 years of active service for retirement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00637

    Original file (BC-2006-00637.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00637 INDEX CODE: 128.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to repay all charges associated with the nontemporary storage (NTS) and have his shipping entitlements reinstated so he can reship his household goods (HHG) at government expense. Therefore, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03655

    Original file (BC-2005-03655.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ECAF states the applicant retired from active duty on 31 January 1992, and the reason he did not relocate within the one year following termination of active duty was not due to an unexpected event beyond his control, but due to his decision to obtain employment in the local area of his last duty station. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Dec...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02157

    Original file (BC-2005-02157.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. JPPSO-SAT/ECAF states that members who retire from service with a home of selection (HOS) authorization are entitled to non-temporary storage from the date the retired orders are issued until 1 year from the date of termination of active duty. Under the provisions of paragraph U5365(D),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02814

    Original file (BC-2005-02814.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The entitlement begins on the date the orders are issued and terminates one year from the date of termination of active duty. However, evidence shows the applicant agreed to have his HHG shipped to Lancaster, CA, upon his separation from active duty and subsequently requested an extension of storage until 23 December 2005. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100816

    Original file (0100816.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00816 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed the travel expenses incurred to pick up his privately owned vehicle (POV), which was stored in Jackson, Mississippi, during his permanent change of station (PCS) assignment from Yokota, AB, Japan, to Mountain Home AFB,...