Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00568A
Original file (BC-2002-00568A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

                       INDEX CODE 100.06  108.01   110.02
IN THE MATTER OF:                            DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-
00568

                                             COUNSEL: No

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In this case for reconsideration/final action, the applicant  requests
that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be  changed  to  one  that
allows reenlistment.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active  duty  on  2  Dec  92  as  a  repair  and
reclamation apprentice and began to experience right knee pain.  After
only two weeks in therapy, disability evaluation was initiated.  Based
on the diagnosis and prognosis the applicant was given,  he  proceeded
with  medical  board  evaluation  and  on  17 Jan  95  was   honorably
discharged after 2 years, 1 month and 16 days of active service in the
grade of airman first class for right palella femoral syndrome  (PFS),
with severance pay at 10%. He was issued an RE code of “2Q” (Medically
retired or discharged) and a Separation Program Designator (SPD)  code
of “JFL”  (Disability,  severance  pay).  In  a  Feb  02  appeal,  the
applicant requested that his unwaiverable RE code be  changed  to  one
allowing reenlistment, contending that his knee problem  had  resolved
after separation. The applicant provided no evidence;  however,  based
on the recommendations of the AFBCMR  Medical  Consultant,  the  Board
concluded on 3 Oct 02 that the applicant’s knee  condition  should  be
reevaluated at Wilford Hall Medical Center (WHMC) to determine medical
fitness for military service.  The results were to be returned to  the
Board for final resolution.

For an accounting of  the  facts  and  circumstances  surrounding  the
applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision  by
the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPD forwarded the results of the WHMC evaluation completed on
25 Nov 02. Orthopedic evaluation found no evidence of any problems  on
physical examination and noted the  applicant  has  no  complaints  of
right knee pain. Further,  X-rays  found  no  evidence  of  arthritis,
fracture or other pathology. The orthopedist recommended the applicant
reenter the Air Force without any limitations to his duty status.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant responded by email and requests an RE code  which  would
allow him to enlist in the Air Force Reserves or to be  reinstated  in
the Air Force Reserves as soon as possible.   If  staffing  needs  are
great in the active duty Air Force, he would consider reinstatement in
the active duty component if the option of base preference (Pope  AFB)
were allowed.  In that case, he also wants to  be  considered  for  at
least one additional grade due to the fact that had he been given time
to complete physical therapy he could have still been in  the  service
and gained time in grade (TIG)/time in service (TIS) and been able  to
test. [Examiner’s Note:  In a telecon with the Chief Examiner on 6 Mar
03, the applicant indicated that he really preferred only to have  his
RE code changed because of his desire to reenlist in the Reserves;  he
included the active duty alternative in  view  of  the  current  world
situation and wanted to indicate his willingness to serve if the Board
believed he should be reinstated to active duty.]

The applicant’s email response is at Exhibit J.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice to warrant amending the applicant’s RE
code. In this regard, the applicant’s discharge  for  a  disqualifying
physical condition may have been premature, as suspected by the AFBCMR
Medical consultant in the original appeal.  Pursuant  to  the  Board’s
recommendation, the applicant received a physical evaluation at  WHMC,
which determined that his previously disqualifying knee condition  had
resolved and he presented no unfitting condition. Their recommendation
was  that  he  be  allowed  to  reenter  the  Air  Force  without  any
limitations. Therefore, we recommend his original unwaiverable RE code
of  “2Q”  be  changed  to  “1J,”  (Eligible  to  Reenlist  but  Elects
Separation)  which  would  allow  immediate  reenlistment  should  the
applicant be so inclined.  In view of the amended RE code, we  further
recommend  that  his  SPD  code  be  changed  from  “JFL”   to   “KFF”
(Secretarial Authority).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to  show  that  he  was  honorably
discharged on 17 January 1995, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-3208,
Secretarial Authority, and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code
of “1J,” rather than “2Q,” and a Separation Program  Designator  (SPD)
code of “KFF,” rather than “JFL,” and that his severance pay  was  not
recouped.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR
No. BC-2002-00568, in Executive Session on 27 March  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
                       Mr. George Franklin, Member
                       Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The
following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit G.  Record of Proceedings, dated 29 Oct 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit H.  HQ AFPC/DPPD’s, Letter, dated 5 Dec 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit I.  AFBCMR’s Letter, dated 13 Jan 03.
   Exhibit J.  Applicant’s Email, dated 27 Feb 03.




                                   WAYNE R. GRACIE
                                   Panel Chair


AFBCMR BC-2002-00568




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to      , be corrected to show that he was honorably
discharged on 17 January 1995, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Secretarial Authority, and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code
of “1J,” rather than “2Q,” and a Separation Program Designator (SPD)
code of “KFF,” rather than “JFL,” and that his severance pay was not
recouped.




                                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                                             Director
                                             Air Force Review Boards
Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200568

    Original file (0200568.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00568 INDEX CODE 108.01 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2Q” (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to one that allows reenlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms the applicant’s RE code...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00679

    Original file (BC-2006-00679.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 December 2004, the applicant was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (defective enlistment agreement), with an honorable discharge, a SPD code of "KDS", an RE code of "2B" and a narrative reason for separation of "Defective Enlistment Agreement." AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00309

    Original file (BC-2008-00309.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 April 2007, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for Chronic Sinusitis, which existed prior to service (EPTS). AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. AFPC/DPSOS's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04051

    Original file (BC-2002-04051.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 3 Dec 99 ice test conducted by a civilian provider concluded that her history of hives was resolved and there was no evidence of urticaria. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded with a personal statement and a letter from her primary care physician, a captain at McConnell AFB, KS. However, since the AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000563

    Original file (0000563.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00563 INDEX NUMBER:110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02028

    Original file (BC-2003-02028.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was medically separated from the Air Force as a result of chronic left shoulder pain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial indicating that although the applicant’s left shoulder was doing well following his discharge, he has an established clinical pattern of recurrent shoulder problems marked by prolonged...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01473

    Original file (BC-2002-01473.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Medical Consultant has indicated that he does not believe that the applicant’s episode of rhabdomyolysis was the result of an underlying muscle abnormality or disease, but rather was the result of other contributing factors; i.e., exertion, heat, pneumonia, and low blood oxygen due to the pneumonia. Therefore, the Medical Consultant recommended that the applicant be medically evaluated at WHMC to assess for an underlying muscle disease to determine whether the applicant’s history of a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802493

    Original file (9802493.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s request for change of his RE code should be approved, this code being 3B as noted above or 3K (Reserved for use by Headquarters Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other RE code applies or is appropriate). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Procurement Programs & Procedures Manager, AFPC/DPPAE, also reviewed this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00378 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be replaced with one that will allow him to reenlist. On 10 September 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OSD-P&R) released guidance pertaining to the correction of military records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717

    Original file (BC-2007-02717.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.