ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
INDEX CODE 100.06 108.01 110.02
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-
00568
COUNSEL: No
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In this case for reconsideration/final action, the applicant requests
that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that
allows reenlistment.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty on 2 Dec 92 as a repair and
reclamation apprentice and began to experience right knee pain. After
only two weeks in therapy, disability evaluation was initiated. Based
on the diagnosis and prognosis the applicant was given, he proceeded
with medical board evaluation and on 17 Jan 95 was honorably
discharged after 2 years, 1 month and 16 days of active service in the
grade of airman first class for right palella femoral syndrome (PFS),
with severance pay at 10%. He was issued an RE code of “2Q” (Medically
retired or discharged) and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code
of “JFL” (Disability, severance pay). In a Feb 02 appeal, the
applicant requested that his unwaiverable RE code be changed to one
allowing reenlistment, contending that his knee problem had resolved
after separation. The applicant provided no evidence; however, based
on the recommendations of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant, the Board
concluded on 3 Oct 02 that the applicant’s knee condition should be
reevaluated at Wilford Hall Medical Center (WHMC) to determine medical
fitness for military service. The results were to be returned to the
Board for final resolution.
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the
applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by
the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPD forwarded the results of the WHMC evaluation completed on
25 Nov 02. Orthopedic evaluation found no evidence of any problems on
physical examination and noted the applicant has no complaints of
right knee pain. Further, X-rays found no evidence of arthritis,
fracture or other pathology. The orthopedist recommended the applicant
reenter the Air Force without any limitations to his duty status.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded by email and requests an RE code which would
allow him to enlist in the Air Force Reserves or to be reinstated in
the Air Force Reserves as soon as possible. If staffing needs are
great in the active duty Air Force, he would consider reinstatement in
the active duty component if the option of base preference (Pope AFB)
were allowed. In that case, he also wants to be considered for at
least one additional grade due to the fact that had he been given time
to complete physical therapy he could have still been in the service
and gained time in grade (TIG)/time in service (TIS) and been able to
test. [Examiner’s Note: In a telecon with the Chief Examiner on 6 Mar
03, the applicant indicated that he really preferred only to have his
RE code changed because of his desire to reenlist in the Reserves; he
included the active duty alternative in view of the current world
situation and wanted to indicate his willingness to serve if the Board
believed he should be reinstated to active duty.]
The applicant’s email response is at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant amending the applicant’s RE
code. In this regard, the applicant’s discharge for a disqualifying
physical condition may have been premature, as suspected by the AFBCMR
Medical consultant in the original appeal. Pursuant to the Board’s
recommendation, the applicant received a physical evaluation at WHMC,
which determined that his previously disqualifying knee condition had
resolved and he presented no unfitting condition. Their recommendation
was that he be allowed to reenter the Air Force without any
limitations. Therefore, we recommend his original unwaiverable RE code
of “2Q” be changed to “1J,” (Eligible to Reenlist but Elects
Separation) which would allow immediate reenlistment should the
applicant be so inclined. In view of the amended RE code, we further
recommend that his SPD code be changed from “JFL” to “KFF”
(Secretarial Authority).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably
discharged on 17 January 1995, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Secretarial Authority, and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code
of “1J,” rather than “2Q,” and a Separation Program Designator (SPD)
code of “KFF,” rather than “JFL,” and that his severance pay was not
recouped.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR
No. BC-2002-00568, in Executive Session on 27 March 2003, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. George Franklin, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 29 Oct 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. HQ AFPC/DPPD’s, Letter, dated 5 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. AFBCMR’s Letter, dated 13 Jan 03.
Exhibit J. Applicant’s Email, dated 27 Feb 03.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2002-00568
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that he was honorably
discharged on 17 January 1995, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Secretarial Authority, and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code
of “1J,” rather than “2Q,” and a Separation Program Designator (SPD)
code of “KFF,” rather than “JFL,” and that his severance pay was not
recouped.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards
Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00568 INDEX CODE 108.01 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2Q” (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to one that allows reenlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms the applicant’s RE code...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00679
On 10 December 2004, the applicant was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (defective enlistment agreement), with an honorable discharge, a SPD code of "KDS", an RE code of "2B" and a narrative reason for separation of "Defective Enlistment Agreement." AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00309
On 16 April 2007, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for Chronic Sinusitis, which existed prior to service (EPTS). AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. AFPC/DPSOS's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04051
A 3 Dec 99 ice test conducted by a civilian provider concluded that her history of hives was resolved and there was no evidence of urticaria. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded with a personal statement and a letter from her primary care physician, a captain at McConnell AFB, KS. However, since the AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that this...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00563 INDEX NUMBER:110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02028
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was medically separated from the Air Force as a result of chronic left shoulder pain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial indicating that although the applicant’s left shoulder was doing well following his discharge, he has an established clinical pattern of recurrent shoulder problems marked by prolonged...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01473
The Medical Consultant has indicated that he does not believe that the applicant’s episode of rhabdomyolysis was the result of an underlying muscle abnormality or disease, but rather was the result of other contributing factors; i.e., exertion, heat, pneumonia, and low blood oxygen due to the pneumonia. Therefore, the Medical Consultant recommended that the applicant be medically evaluated at WHMC to assess for an underlying muscle disease to determine whether the applicant’s history of a...
The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s request for change of his RE code should be approved, this code being 3B as noted above or 3K (Reserved for use by Headquarters Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other RE code applies or is appropriate). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Procurement Programs & Procedures Manager, AFPC/DPPAE, also reviewed this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00378 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be replaced with one that will allow him to reenlist. On 10 September 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OSD-P&R) released guidance pertaining to the correction of military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.