RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00141
INDEX CODE: 102.07, 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her date of rank (DOR) be changed to 2 Jun 99, rather than 13 Jul 01.
2. She be awarded the Air Force Organizational Excellence Award (AFOEA)
that was awarded to the U.S Air Force Academy (USAFA) classes of 1995 -
1998.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The basis for her discharge from active duty on 6 Aug 99 was medical
conditions that were diagnosed as permanent. However, she has since been
commissioned based on the absence of medical problems. She had a history
of hypothyroidism and was put on thyroid medication. Her physician stopped
her medication in order to treat a spider bite. She had not been on the
medication for nearly 9 months prior to her discharge. Her history of
microhemauria has only been present since her spider bite in July 1998. It
has not affected her health or day-to-day functions. Her symptoms of
plexopathy did not reappear in April 1998. The symptoms have never been
documented as reappearing and did not in any way hamper her abilities to
complete all training requirements for graduation. While a series of tests
done in August/September 1998 showed some deficiency in the left shoulder,
further evaluations done in November 2000 showed no deficiency. She was
put on antidepressant medication in order to help her sleep better. She
was only on the medication for 6 weeks. At the time of her discharge, she
was not on any antidepressant medication. In November 2000, she was
reevaluated and given a clean bill of health.
She was a member of the Class of 1998 at the timeframe of the award of the
AFOEA and completed Combat Survival Training during her second summer at
the Academy.
In support of her request, applicant provided a copy of her Cadet Medical
Evaluation Board (CMEB) report, extracts from her medical records, a letter
from her physician, a recommendation for award of the MOVSM, a copy of the
AFAM, a copy of her USAFA transcript, and a copy of her DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. Her complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the USAFA Class of 1998 on 30 Jun 94. On 1 Sep 95,
she was involved in an automobile accident and sustained injuries to her
left arm and shoulder. In October 1995, she underwent a CMEB. She was
placed in "turn back" status (not actively enrolled and going to classes)
for recovery. She resumed her studies in the summer of 1996 joining the
class of 1999. She was hospitalized from 17 - 21 July 1998 for groin
injuries secondary to an arthropod bite. Following her hospitalization she
developed disabling pain about her right hip and groin that persisted
through her senior year at the Academy. In October 1998, she was diagnosed
with Adjustment Disorder. She underwent another CMEB in May 1999 to
determine her fitness for commissioning. The CMEB found her medically
disqualified for commissioning due to arthropod bite, hypothyroidism,
osteoarthritis of the right hip, plexopathy of the left upper extremity,
thin basement membrane disease, and reactive depression. She was allowed
to graduate with a Bachelor's degree from the USAFA without a commission
and was medically discharged on 6 Aug 99.
Subsequent to her discharge, she obtained satisfactory physical and
psychiatry evaluations. She was reevaluated in November 2000, given a
clean bill of health, and reentered the USAFA. She graduated in 2001 and
was appointed a second lieutenant Reserve of the Air Force on 13 Jul 01.
Her request to receive the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal
(MOVSM), the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), and credit for completing
Combat Survival Training has been administratively corrected.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Consultant states that
her last year at the USAFA was marked by the requirement for extensive
medical care for a variety of conditions that posed ongoing limitations to
duty and raised concern regarding her fitness for commissioning and
continued service. The three conditions that appeared most problematic
were left arm plexopathy, right hip girdle and groin pain, and adjustment
disorder. Her left brachial plexopathy injury incurred in a motor vehicle
accident in September 1996 resulted in persistent left arm weakness and
coordination difficulties with certain activities. Although a September
1998 examination revealed significant weakness of her left hand grip
strength and forearm rotation, there was no clear documentation to what
extent she was limited by this condition other than pain and numbness. In
the summer of 1998 her neurologist felt her defect had stabilized showing a
fixed impairment that would interfere with activities requiring strength
and coordination of the left arm. In the summer of 1998 she developed
disabling right hip girdle and groin pain associated with an apparent
spider bite that continued to prevent her from participating in cadet
physical training activities at the time of graduation. In October 1998
during her senior year she was diagnosed with adjustment disorder. A
psychiatry examination of May 1999 confirmed ongoing symptoms of this
disorder and recommended a course of treatments with antidepressants and
states her condition as disqualifying. The consultant notes that she was
able to complete her course of study to graduate and receive her degree,
notably on the Dean’s and Commandant’s Honor list. Her disabling right
girdle and groin pain could have been due to loin pain syndrome as
suggested by the consulting nephrologist. Loin pain syndrome is a poorly
defined disorder characterized by loin (groin) pain mainly in young women.
Patients with loin pain syndrome are reported to have a psychologic
component to their symptoms and are more likely to have unexplained somatic
symptoms, a history of an adverse psychological event preceding the onset
of pain and a history of greater analgesic ingestion.
In view of the presence of multiple conditions interfering with activities
required of a cadet, a decision regarding fitness for commissioning and
continued military service had to be made. For cadets who have completed 2
years, the medical standards in AFI 48-123, Attachment 2 are used. In view
of the uncertainty of the cause of her primary disabling condition (pain
involving the groin, hip and sacroiliac area) and the prolonged nature and
lack of improvement over a considerable period of observation, it did not
appear that she was going to improve in any reasonable period of time, if
at all. Her other medical conditions, although each alone are not
necessarily unfitting, added to the overall picture of an individual who
was not fit for commissioning and continued military service. The decision
to medically discharge rather than commission her at the time was clearly
proper. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAO recommends denial. DPPAO states that the applicant's Total
Active Federal Military Service Date, Total Active Federal Commissioned
Service Date, Total Federal Commissioned Service Date, and pay date were
established correctly. The DPPAO evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPPOO recommends denial. DPPPOO states that by law, a graduate of
the USAFA is originally appointed a second lieutenant upon graduation and
is not entitled to any service credit. There are no provisions of law to
have a date of rank prior to the date of her initial appointment into the
Air Force. The DPPPOO evaluation is at Exhibit E.
AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of her request to add the AFOEA to her
records. She is not eligible to share in any unit awards while a cadet
since she did not graduate during that period of time. The USAFA has
specifically stated that only cadets who graduated from the Academy during
1993 - 1999 are authorized to share in the unit awards. Since she did not
graduate until 2001, she is not eligible for any unit awards earned by the
Academy during 1993 - 1999. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6
Feb 03 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant award of the AFOEA. In
this respect, we note that the established criteria for award of the AFOEA
indicates that cadets from the graduating classes of 1993 through 1998 are
authorized to wear the AFOEM. The applicant entered the USAFA in 1994, as
a member of the graduating class of 1998. However, after a 1995 Cadet
Medical Evaluation Board determination, she was temporarily placed in a
"turn back" status until she was able to resume her studies in 1996 with
the graduating class of 1999. The applicant was assigned and attached to
the graduating class of 1998 and contributed to the mission and
accomplishments of that class, thus it is our opinion that she should be
authorized to wear the AFOEA. Accordingly, we recommend that her records
be corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. Regarding her request that her DOR be changed to 2 Jun 99, her
contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinions of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility that her DOR and service dates were
computed correctly upon her graduation and that she is not entitled to any
service credit. Therefore, we adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that she has not been the victim of an error or injustice in
this matter. In the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend favorable consideration of that
portion of her request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was awarded the Air Force
Organizational Excellence Award, in accordance with Special Order GB-091,
dated 3 May 1995.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00141 in
Executive Session on 12 Mar 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Oct 01, w/atchs .
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 9 May 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAO, dated 30 Aug 02, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPPOO, dated 9 Oct 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 23 Jan 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Feb 03.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-00141
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was awarded the Air
Force Organizational Excellence Award, in accordance with Special Order GB-
091, dated 3 May 1995.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01116
Members must be permanently assigned or attached by official orders to the joint unit receiving the JMUA. The Services may award appropriate Service unit awards to their units assigned and/or attached to a JTF. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: She provides the Joint Staff permanent order number J-1SO-0246- 12 announcing the award of the JMUA to Headquarters USCENTCOM from 2 Jul 10 to 31 Jul 12 as well as several copies of...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 June 1996, the applicant was appointed a cadet in the United States Air Force Academy. They recommended that he be disenrolled for academic deficiency. The father states that at no time has he ever charged that the Academy failed to follow Air Force regulations.
It is the opinion of USAFA/JA that the Cadet Medical Evaluation Board (CMEB) recommendation for applicant's medical discharge was properly processed and, based upon the medical opinions provided, resulted in an appropriate decision by the Secretary to medically discharge the applicant. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded that applicant's involuntary - disenrollment from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) should be changed to a voluntary resignation...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1986-04015FORMAL
Similarly, the applicant has recast his previously rejected argument regarding his "miscounseling" by former HPAC Chairmen, Colonel C and Lt Col W. In support, the applicant asserts that five 1983 U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA) graduates who subsequently graduated from the USUHS 1987 Class were granted relief by the AFBCMR based on the erroneous counseling by Colonel C and Lt Col W. As it regards Colonel C, the Board has previously concluded that there was "no showing of misinformation by...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02626
If she is not excused from further service and given an honorable discharge with back pay, she receive full pay from the date of her graduation through the date of any decision by the Board. Counsel’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Legal Advisor reviewed counsel’s response to his original advisory and recommends the applicant be granted retroactive...
On 7 April 1997, the applicant again requested reconsideration based on the fact that the Board had granted several cases that he believed to be similar to his case (Exhibit CC with Attachments). In their view, the former HPAC chairman’s letter does not contain any evidence or information that was not known and available to the applicant when he filed his original application in 1985. "; the latter applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03720
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03720 INDEX NUMBER: 104.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 785, “Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training,” prepared on him, dated 13 Jan 01, be amended in Section IV, “Evaluation to be Considered in the Future for Determining Acceptability...
The case is then reviewed by the Superintendent, who considers the recommendation of the ARC and the cadet’s entire record. Following the ARC proceedings, the Superintendent reviewed the case and the cadet record and ordered the applicant’s disenrollment. USAFA/JA also states that he contacted the applicant’s Air Officer Commanding (AOC) and denied harassing the applicant at any time.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02840
He suffered from a serious brain tumor condition that was corrected by surgery and removal of the tumor was more than three years ago. The board finds the member unfit for duty at this time and he should be placed on the TDRL and re-evaluated in 18 months. The applicant contends that he is fit for duty and there is no reason to question the Commandant of Cadets who indicated the applicant was fulfilling all duties required of cadets at the time he was placed on TDRL.
The applicant committed a violation of the Honor Code that was deserving of disenrollment, and none of his arguments can change that fact. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was disenrolled from the Air Force Academy for an honor code violation. We further note that the Air Force Psrsonnel Board, concerned about the appearance of inconsistent treatment 3 AFBCMR 97-03098 - regarding the applicant‘s case and a similar case of another cadet, returned the applicant’s case to...