RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01841
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Retention Years Ending (RYE) 23 April 1996 and 22 April 1997 be
changed from unsatisfactory to satisfactory years.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPP recommended denial. They indicated that being an Individual
Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) the applicant is required to earn 12
Active Duty points and 24 Inactive Duty Training points per fiscal
year plus fulfill the 50-point Retirement Retention (R/R) year
requirement. From the sample submitted it looks as if the applicant
was shown how to use the Air Force form 1951, designed to help IMAs
schedule their participation. Also, as an additional training tool
when IMAs are assigned, they are mailed an information package
explaining these requirements. The information that the Base
Education & Training Manager states in her letter regarding how she
trains each newly assigned IMA is accurate. The other letter the
applicant submitted is from an IMA who claims to have also received
misguided information when she entered the IMA program. They cannot
begin to know what type of training IMAs receive when they enter the
program; however, since the Base Education & Training Manager has been
performing this training, not only to IMAs, but during briefings for
20 years, they believe she has demonstrated to her superiors her
expertise.
If the Board rules in favor of the applicant, the Board would have to
award the applicant 4 non-paid inactive duty training (IDT) points for
Retention Year Ending (RYE) 22 April 1996 and 8 non-paid IDT points
for RYE 22 April 1997. The applicant’s record would then show for RYE
22 April 1996, 7 AD points, 28 IDT points, 0 Extension Course
Institute (ECI) points, 15 membership points, 50 total and retirement
points and a year of satisfactory service. For RYE 22 April 1997, the
record would show 13 AD points, 22 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15
membership points, 50 total and retirement points and a year of
satisfactory service.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 July 2002, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01841 in Executive Session on 28 August 2002, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Member
Ms. Cheryl Dare, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 May 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 3 July 2002.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 July 2002.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132
His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00954
For RYE 22 December 2002, the applicant is credited with 313 active duty (AD) points, 16 IDT points, 0 Extension Course Institute (ECI) points, 15 membership points, 344 total points and a satisfactory year of Federal service. For RYE 22 December 2003, the applicant is credited with 12 AD points, 8 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 35 total points and an unsatisfactory year of Federal service. For RYE 22 December 2003, the member is now credited with 12 AD points, 20 IDT...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03272
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice as there is no evidence that he did not have sufficient opportunity during the 10 months after his assignment to the 37 th SFS to earn the additional 16 points he needed for a satisfactory year of service for RYE 9 January 2008. The applicant be...
She did not perform any IDT points during the R/R year 24 January 2001 through 23 January 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03370
Points for participation can only be credited for the dates the inactive duty was performed. Correction to the advisory is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and indicated that although the Reserve Order DA-01859 does assign him to the 514th AMW as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) he was in fact hired as a full-time Air Reserve Technician (ART). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00869
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She and another unit member contacted HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in July 2006 and inquired as to whether or not her duty status needed to be altered on orders. DPP notes her statement that she was unable to perform IDT training on 13 August 2005 because the entire building was closed on that Saturday and training was not available. ...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
The applicant is requesting satisfactory service be granted for Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 23 February 1997. I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 1 5 4 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00658
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00658 INDEX CODE: 135.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 August 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect satisfactory service for retirement year ending (RYE) 11 November 1999 by transferring four Inactive Duty for Training (IDT) points he...