RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00775
INDEX CODE: 108.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect recognition for his bravery on 31
Dec 71.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 12
Apr 02 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00775 in Executive Session on 21 May 02, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Feb 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 8 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Apr 02.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 27 Sep 02 for review and response. After careful...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Limited documentation was available because the applicant’s military personnel records were lost or destroyed by fire. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's requests and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states that without any documentation showing the applicant was deployed to the Persian Gulf in direct support of an operation, they can not verify her eligibility for the Southwest Asia Service Medal. After reviewing the evidence of record we are not persuaded the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence showing the applicant’s service meets the...
On 30 Aug 70, the applicant was relieved from his assignment in the Air Force Reserve and honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve in the grade of E-1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied. Since the applicant was not on active duty at the time the Air Force Overseas (Long/Short) Tour Ribbon was established, he is not eligible for this award.
Therefore, the only issues under consideration before the Board are his contentions that he is eligible for award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon. They recommend the applicant's request for award of the VSM, PUC, and Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon be denied. However, the applicant has not presented persuasive evidence that he is eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal, Presidential Unit Citation and the...
He stated that the DFC was awarded for completion of 35 combat flight missions. Therefore, the basis for the applicant’s claim that all other crew members of the 2 Oct 44 combat flight mission received the DFC is unsubstantiated. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration through his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00665 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the place of his foreign service and award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Mar 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01634
The DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Sep 02 for review and comment within 30 days. While the applicant could not provide a copy of the order awarding him the AFCM (1OLC) for the period in question, we are persuaded by the evidence provided by the applicant that the award was processed and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02575 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Medal with First and Second Oak Leaf Clusters (AM w/1 and 2 OLC). There is nothing in the applicant’s records to indicate that he was recommended for, or awarded, the AM w/2 OLC. ...