Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200393
Original file (0200393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00393
            INDEX CODE:  108.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect the  destination  of  his  service
overseas, to include the Azore Islands and Paris, France;  and,  award
of the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Limited documentation was available because the  applicant’s  military
personnel records were lost or  destroyed  by  fire.   Therefore,  the
facts concerning the applicant’s overseas  assignments  could  not  be
verified.

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter  prepared  by  the  appropriate  office  of  the   Air   Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record  of
Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR  reviewed  this   application   and   recommended   denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response which
is attached at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  probable  error  or  injustice.    After   careful
consideration of applicant's requests and the  available  evidence  of
record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant
corrective action.   It  appears  that  the  applicant  is  requesting
correction of his records in an  attempt  to  obtain  a  property  tax
exemption from the state of New York.  In order to do so, he  believes
that his records need to be corrected to verify his  wartime  service,
particularly his  overseas  service.   While  it  is  clear  that  the
applicant served overseas, he was not assigned  to  an  overseas  unit
during the period the European-African-Middle Eastern  Campaign  Medal
was awarded.  In this respect, we note that the  medal  was  based  on
service performed in that theater of operations from 7 Dec 41  through
8 Nov 45, and his transport and ferrying missions did not begin  until
27 Mar 46.  Furthermore, there is no provision to list  the  locations
of his missions overseas on his separation document.  In view  of  the
foregoing, and absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied  rights
to which entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no  basis  to  disturb
the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00393 in Executive Session on 21 May 02, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Feb 97, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 8 Apr 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Apr 02.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, applicant, dated 11 May 02, w/atchs.




                                   PEGGY E. GORDON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200101

    Original file (0200101.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated that the DFC was awarded for completion of 35 combat flight missions. Therefore, the basis for the applicant’s claim that all other crew members of the 2 Oct 44 combat flight mission received the DFC is unsubstantiated. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration through his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02151

    Original file (BC-2002-02151.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02151 COUNSEL: MARY NEWMAN HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH). The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102482

    Original file (0102482.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPSAMP recommends the application be denied. With regards to inserting applicant’s personal statement in his Master Personnel Records (MPR), we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the appropriate Air Force office, HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200288

    Original file (0200288.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated that to be awarded the Purple Heart (PH), a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. It is understandable that he wouldn’t have sought medical treatment for a mere bruise on his shoulder and burn on his hip - so the lack of medical records should not bar him from being awarded the Purple Heart. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 20 April 2002, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100188

    Original file (0100188.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request for correction of the former service member’s records to reflect Prisoner of War (POW) status, that his rank of corporal (E-3) be changed to sergeant (E-4), and that he be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal and Purple Heart Medal, and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00358

    Original file (BC-2005-00358.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states that, among other things, that the requested relief should be favorably considered based on the recommendation of the member’s former commander and in view of the established Eighth Air Force policy in effect during the period in question. In this respect, we note the member completed a total of 12 combat missions while...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00359

    Original file (BC-2005-00359.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for applicant states, among other things, in view of the established Eighth Air Force policy in effect during the period in question, the member was due the AM for his completion of five combat missions. Although the member’s records were destroyed by fire in 1973, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has indicated that based on his time in service during World War...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00413

    Original file (BC-2005-00413.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should receive the DFC and SS with 9 battle stars based on his successful completion of 50 combat missions and since he was shot down 3 times. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of applicant’s request for the DFC and states, in part, that in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201338

    Original file (0201338.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01338 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received while saving the life of a young officer. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00863

    Original file (BC-2005-00863.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00863 INDEX CODE: 107.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 SEP 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Air Medal (AM). After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available...