Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200746
Original file (0200746.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00746
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter  prepared  by  the  appropriate  office  of  the   Air   Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record  of
Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS  reviewed  this   application   and   recommended   denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  12
Apr 02 for review and response.  As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After careful  consideration  of
applicant's request and the available  evidence  of  record,  we  find
insufficient evidence of error  or  injustice  to  warrant  corrective
action.  The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion  appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not  been  rebutted  by
applicant.  Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights  to
which  entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not   followed,   or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no  basis  to  disturb
the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00746 in Executive Session on 21 May 02, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Mar 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Apr 02.




                                   PEGGY E. GORDON
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102312

    Original file (0102312.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 1 Mar 02 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01490

    Original file (BC-2002-01490.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01490 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard. The applicant’s request for a conditional waiver of an administrative discharge board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201490

    Original file (0201490.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01490 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard. The applicant’s request for a conditional waiver of an administrative discharge board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200082

    Original file (0200082.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his 13 years of service, he never received an Article 15 or any such reprimands. The application was timely filed. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 3 Apr 01, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202217

    Original file (0202217.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 20 Aug 91. He provided no other facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 20 Aug 91.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201499

    Original file (0201499.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01499 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting a change to the narrative reason for separation. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200578

    Original file (0200578.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00578 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable discharge and her reenlistment (RE) code changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200223

    Original file (0200223.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00223 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment code of “3D” be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202227

    Original file (0202227.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02227 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with theprocedural and substantive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200199

    Original file (0200199.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He recommended that applicant be discharged from the service. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he is now retired and a member of the American Legion. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 02, w/atchs.