RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00562
INDEX CODE 112.07 128.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment be changed from 3 December 2001 so that he may
qualify for a higher selective reenlistment bonus (SRB).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He reenlisted on 3 December 2001 with an SRB multiplier of 2.0 and
on 1 January 2002, it was raised to 3.5. He was still eligible to
reenlist at the time of the change as his original date to reenlist
was 11 February 2002.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial.
The applicant reenlisted on 3 December 2001 for six (6) years.
On 17 January 2002, HQ USAF released a new SRB list that changed
the SRB entitlement for the applicant’s Air Force Specialty Code
(AFSC) from a multiple of 2.0 to 3.5. The window to get the SRB
recomputed was if a member reenlisted between 2 January 2002 and
16 January 2002. The SRB was not announced during the timeframe
the applicant reenlisted, so the MPF could not have briefed him
that an SRB review was taking place.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 26 April 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 June 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. George Franklin, Member
Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Feb 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 Apr 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Apr 02, w/atchs.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
Members of the Board Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Mr. George Franklin, and Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr. considered this application on 11 June 2002. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 16 May 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-01022 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00680 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment date of 1 Jan 02 be changed to 2 Jan 02 in order to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427 INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). HQ AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00021
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-00021 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1 January 2002 reenlistment be changed to 19 January 2002, which will entitle him to a higher selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The SRB review had not been announced as of the date he reenlisted and therefore, the MPF was not able...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01904
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP states that the applicant’s request is vague because he does not specify exactly which report he is contesting. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB states that due to the applicant’s new date of rank to A1C of 9 January 1995, he was promoted to Senior Airman (SrA) on 5 September 1996 (20 months time-in-grade). We took notice of the applicant's complete...
On 6 Sep 1985, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Early Separation Program – Strength Reduction) in the grade of airman first class with an honorable characterization of service and an RE code of 2X [First term airman considered but not selected under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)]. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and indicated that the RE code 2X is correct. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01315 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of reenlistment be changed from 11 December 2001 to 29 January 2002 to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The applicant reenlisted on 11 December 2001 before the SRB review had been announced...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03775
They indicated that the applicant contends the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to provide counseling regarding a pending SRB change. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 December 2002. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 December 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...