RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427
INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit
E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for
a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The events of 9/11 generated an increased need for force protection
and she played an integral part in the new concerns over installation
security. She was pulled from her present position and, in support of
Phoenix Raven, required to perform almost non-stop temporary duty
(TDY) in the US and overseas. Also, towards the end of 2001, her
mother died unexpectedly and she had to take emergency leave. In four
months, she was absent just under 100 days out of 120. Between her job
going full throttle and the death of her mother, she requested an
extension to keep from being caught off guard if Stop Loss was lifted
while she was deployed, to cover her family, and to give herself time
to think things through. When she came back from emergency leave, she
was back on the road again up until her 10-year reenlistment
anniversary of 21 May 02. She had already departed for a 65-day
deployment when the 305th AMW/CAA notice, dated 6 Feb 02, advised her
of her selection for reenlistment and the mandatory career assistance
briefing. Her supervisor was deployed just as much as she was.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 May 92 for a
period of four years, giving her a date of separation (DOS) of 20 May
96. In order to qualify for a CONUS reassignment, she extended this
enlistment for 23 months on 12 Oct 94, giving her a new DOS of 20 Apr
98.
During the period in question, the applicant was assigned to the 305th
Security Forces Squadron at McGuire AFB, NJ.
She reenlisted on 24 Dec 96 for five years, giving her a DOS of 23 Dec
01. According to an AF Form 1411 in her records, the applicant at
some time apparently extended this enlistment for three months, which
gave her a new DOS of 23 Mar 02.
In Jan 02, she requested a Best Interest of the Air Force Extension,
which is a voluntary extension, for a period of nine months. This
second extension to her 24 Dec 96 reenlistment was approved on 11 Jan
02. The two extensions total 12 months, giving her a DOS of 23 Dec
02.
According to vouchers and orders submitted by the applicant, she was
TDY for the following periods: 14 - 22 Sep 01, 1 Oct – 5 Nov 01, 1 –
4 Dec 01, 21 – 23 Jan 02; 30 Jan – 5 Apr 02, 11 – 23 May 02.
A memo to the applicant from the 305th AMW/CAA, dated 6 Feb 02,
advised her that she had been selected for reenlistment and was
scheduled for a mandatory Right Choice career assistance briefing.
The informational briefing would provide facts regarding the
applicant’s options and was held each Wednesday at 1500 hours. She
was advised to attend a briefing within the next month and, if she was
unable to make a scheduled appointment during the next month due to
valid mission requirements, she must contact the career advisor to
reschedule. On 6 Feb 02, the applicant was TDY at Kadena AB, Japan.
The applicant reached her 10-year anniversary on 20 May 02. HQ
AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff that in order for the
applicant to qualify for a Zone B, Multiple of 1 SRB, she would have
to reenlist no later than 19 May 02. On that date, she would have
seven months of obligated service. If both extensions were voided,
the applicant would revert back to her original DOS of 23 Dec 01 and,
at that time, the SRB was not in effect.
On 6 Dec 02, the applicant reenlisted for a period of four years,
giving her a new DOS of 5 Dec 06.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE noted that, though inconvenient, the applicant could
have reenlisted at her home station or at any of her deployed
locations before reaching her 10-year point of May 02. They understand
the applicant was doing more than her fair share of deployments;
however, deployments should not override a
member’s individual responsibility in taking care of her own career.
Though busy, members are responsible for their own careers and should
be aware when they are eligible for an SRB. Denial is recommended.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9
Aug 02 for review and response within 30 days. Pursuant to an inquiry
from the AFBCMR Staff as to how long the applicant would want to
enlist should her appeal be granted, the applicant submitted an email
on 28 Aug 02. She indicated she wanted a six-year term and also
requested that the nine-month extension be voided as well. She
contends this is time wasted that she may need later. She was in no
state of mind to make a decision when she extended. When she learned
there was an SRB, she hurried to her military personnel flight (MPF)
to reenlist but was told she had missed her window for an SRB.
A complete copy of applicant’s email response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice to warrant voiding the applicant’s
nine-month extension and reenlisting her before her 10-year
anniversary so she qualifies for an SRB. In this regard, we find it
very believable that the applicant’s almost constant TDY and her
mother’s death just before Christmas left little time and opportunity
for her to consider her career options before she passed the SRB
window. Based on her extensions, it appears the applicant’s preference
was to remain in the Air Force if her family circumstances permitted.
She was TDY when the 305th AMW/CAA memo advised her she was selected
for reenlistment and scheduled for a career assistance briefing. She
requested the nine-month extension in Jan 02 to keep from being caught
off guard if Stop Loss was lifted while she was deployed, to protect
her family and to give herself time to consider her options. The
applicant was required to juggle both the pressures of a demanding job
and family obligations under extremely trying circumstances. We do not
believe she should be deprived of her bonus merely because she was
constantly traveling in service of her country. Further, the nine-
month extension should be voided so that her SRB is not unduly reduced
by this obligated service. Therefore, we recommend her records be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. Her extension of her 24 December 1996 enlistment executed on
11 January 2002 for a period of nine (9) months be declared void.
b. She was honorably discharged on 19 March 2002, rather than 5
December 2002, and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 March
2002, rather than 6 December 2002, for a period of six (6) years, with
entitlement to a Zone B, Multiple 1, Selective Reenlistment Bonus.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 10 December 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02427 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jul 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 5 Aug 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Aug 02.
Exhibit E. Email, Applicant, dated 28 Aug 02.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Acting Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-02427
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating , be corrected to show that:
a. Her extension of her 24 December 1996 enlistment executed on
11 January 2002 for a period of nine (9) months be, and hereby is,
declared void.
b. She was honorably discharged on 19 March 2002, rather than 5
December 2002, and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 March
2002, rather than 6 December 2002, for a period of six (6) years, with
entitlement to a Zone B, Multiple 1, Selective Reenlistment Bonus.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03872
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of his request for promotion reinstatement indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01747
In a 15 Nov 02 letter to the applicant, the Superintendent of the --rd Wing IG with the Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) advised that, following an interview, the briefer denied having the conversation with the applicant and asserted she had briefed countless individuals regarding declination statements and was well aware of the ramifications. The handout directed him to the MPF for counsel if his desire was to separate. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03105
Then she found out she had been miscounseled and had actually been eligible to reenlist in Jun 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends partially granting, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0560
T CONCLUSIONS: The board concludes there is no legal or equitable basis to upgrade or change the applicant’s discharge or re-cnlistment code, Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2001-0560 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD Jeni hipes (Former A1lC) (HGH Aic) ae 1. The commander recommended the respondent be separated from the Air Force with a General Discharge without Probation and Rehabilitation (P&R). For the Government: A preponderance of the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01201
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01201 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full five years he reenlisted for on 8 Feb 05 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05701
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05701 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 8 Aug 12 enlistment contract authorizing her Zone C Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be enforced or in the alternative be cancelled. On 21 Nov 12, the applicant filed a complaint with the IG alleging her 8 Aug 12 reenlistment contract was altered removing the SRB information without her knowledge and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03937
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03937 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her line number for promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant (SMSgt/E-8) be reinstated for promotion cycle 11E8. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03463
The window to get the SRB recomputed was if the member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted (17 Dec 01); therefore, the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...