RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00802
INDEX CODE: 113.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The debt of $5,133.31 incurred as a result of his separation on 1 March
1999 for an Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) of 31 May 1999 be
remitted.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While he understands the ADSC commitment he incurred as an Air Force
Academy graduate, he separated from active duty to enter the Air Force
Reserve.
The applicant states that he has been on active duty status in the Air
Force Reserve since 8 March 1999, and will remain on active duty until
28 April 2000. As such, he believes he is still fulfilling his commitment
to the active duty Air Force. When he separated from active duty, he had
38 days of leave that were withheld from his pay which amounts to $3,100.
When he submitted his separation paperwork, he apparently did not make it
clear that he would be on active duty status while in the Air Force
Reserve. Upon receiving notice that his separation request was approved,
he was advised that he was required to serve an indefinite term appointment
in the Air Force Reserves. He did not know if the Air Force expected him to
monetarily pay for his remaining ADSC or if he was required to fulfill his
obligation through the Air Force Reserves.
The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 June 1994, the applicant graduated from the Air Force Academy and
incurred an ADSC of 31 May 1999.
On 25 January 1999, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council
(SAFPC) approved applicant’s 9 December 1998 request to curtail his date of
separation to 1 March 1999. The SAFPC noted the approval did not excuse
any indebtedness to the government.
The applicant resigned his Regular Air Force commission and was honorably
discharged and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of
AFI 36-3207 (Miscellaneous/General Reasons) on 1 March 1999.
On 8 March 1999, the applicant was ordered to active duty and assigned to
McConnell AFB with a release date of 26 April 2000.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, reviewed the application and states
they contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch and were advised that had
they received the applicant’s remission request while he was still on
active duty, they would have recommended the debt be collected in full
based on the criteria provided in Public Law 92-453. Therefore, they
recommend the application be denied.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that nearly 100
academy graduates from the class of 1994 were allowed to separate from
active duty almost a full year sooner than their ADSC of 31 May 1999.
These individuals were not required to pay back the debt. However, in his
situation, he is asking for 90-days out of his initial ADSC to enter
Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) as a reservist, and is required to pay
$5,133.31.
The applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit G.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the
circumstances surrounding applicant's resignation of his Regular Air Force
commission, we are persuaded that the indebtedness incurred as a result of
his separation from active duty should be waived. In this respect, we note
that applicant was transferred to the Air Force Reserve; that at the time
of his transfer he lost 38 days of leave; that he continues to serve on
active duty as a Reserve officer; and, that his decision to resign was to
obtain a pilot training slot, which, in our opinion, will benefit the Air
Force. In view of the above findings and since applicant continues to
serve on active duty past his original active duty service commitment date
of 31 May 1999, we believe that he should be relieved of the indebtedness
in question. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the
extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge from
the Air Force Academy, the Secretary of the Air Force found that under the
particular circumstances of his case, his resignation was not voluntary
within the meaning of Title 10, United States Code, Section 2005, and that
accordingly, no debt was established to reimburse the United States for the
cost of his education at the Air Force Academy.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 9 December 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Member
Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Mar 99.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-DE/FYCC, dated 10 May 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 Jul 99.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Ltr, dated 24 Aug 99.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 25 Aug 99.
Exhibit G. Applicant's Response, dated 19 Sep 99.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-00802
INDEX CODE: 113.04
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his
discharge from the Air Force Academy, the Secretary of the Air Force found
that under the particular circumstances of his case, his resignation was
not voluntary within the meaning of Title 10, United States Code, Section
2005, and that accordingly, no debt was established to reimburse the United
States for the cost of his education at the Air Force Academy.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His six-year UNT ADSC is incorrect because Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments (ADSC) and Specified Period of Time Contracts (SPTC), dated 1 September 1998, Table 1.4, Note 3b, states, “Individuals graduating from military service academies and AFROTC programs on 1 January 1992 or later incur a 5- year and 4-year ADSC respectively.” Applicant’s complete statement and...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His six-year UNT ADSC is incorrect because Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments (ADSC) and Specified Period of Time Contracts (SPTC), dated 1 September 1998, Table 1.4, Note 3b, states, “Individuals graduating from military service academies and AFROTC programs on 1 January 1992 or later incur a 5- year and 4-year ADSC respectively.” Applicant’s complete statement and...
Based on the information provided, DFAS-DE/FYCC finds there has not been an error or an injustice and recommended the applicant’s request be denied (Exhibit D). Inasmuch as the applicant is a civil service employee working in the same organization, performing similar duties, as he did while on active duty, we are of the opinion that the Government has received no less benefit now that he is a civilian than if he stayed on active duty. TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-03192 MEMORANDUM...
_________________________________________________________________ DFAS EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, reviewed the application and states that they contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS- DE/FYCT) for their recommendation and were informed that had the applicant’s remission application been received prior to his separation, they would have recommended remission of $316.65 and denial of $320.00 based on guidelines set forth by the Office of the Secretary of the...
_________________________________________________________________ DFAS-DE EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, reviewed the application and states that they contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS- DE/FYCT) for their recommendation and were informed that, had they received the applicant’s remission application prior to his separation on 9 August 1996, they would have recommended remission of $528.75 and denial of $753.04 based on guidelines set forth by the Office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05646
On 14 Feb 13, after self-eliminating from pilot training, an Officer Initial Skills Training (IST) Reclassification Panel recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force, and that he repay $148,938 for the unserved portion of the active duty service commitment (ADSC) he incurred due to his Air Force Academy scholarship. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
On 29 Sep 98, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the recommendation of the United States Air Force Academy Superintendent to disenroll applicant and directed that he be honorably separated from cadet status, transferred to the Air Force Reserve and ordered to active duty for a period of three years. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Staff Judge Advocate, HQ USAFA/JA, stated that the applicant was disenrolled from the Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be released from his 24-month active duty service commitment (ADSC) he incurred when he was disenrolled from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). DPPAES recommends the applicant reimburse the Air Force for the cost of the Academy education...
Therefore, the applicant’s ADSC in the PDS should reflect a date of 20 July 2002. While they do not support the applicant’s request to change his ADSC to 26 June 2002, they do recommend the ADSC be changed to 20 July 2002 based upon the AF Form 475 (Exhibit C). ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he incurred a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1999-00780B
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-00780 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: Mr. Fred L. Bauer HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). A Wing Honor Board (WHB) found the applicant in violation of the USAF Academy Honor Code on the allegation that he had obtained...