RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00690
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be credited with an extra point to reflect a satisfactory year of
Federal service for the retirement/retention (R/R) year ending 29
April 1998.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
A paperwork error regarding his transfer to the Reserve Individual
Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) program caused him to have the bad year.
A timing constraint prevented him from performing a 30-day tour of
duty until after the end of his R/R year. He was never told about R/R
requirements and that he believed a good year centered around the
fiscal year, as he stated was always the situation in the Air National
Guard (ANG).
The applicant did not submit any supporting documentation with his
application.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 30 Apr 83, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve
of the Air Force, and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty
on 14 May 83. On 1 Dec 89, he was released from active duty in the
grade of captain and transferred to the Air Force Reserve,
Nonaffiliated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS), and
remained there until he was appointed a captain in the Nevada Air
National Guard (ANG), effective 4 Dec 89. The applicant was
progressively promoted to the grade of major, with a date of rank of
30 Apr 97. On 17 Feb 98, he was honorably discharged from the Nevada
ANG in the grade of major and transferred to the Air Force Reserve IMA
program, effective 18 Feb 98.
Information extracted from the applicant’s Point Credit Summary
indicates that he was credited with satisfactory years of Federal
service for the R/R years 30 Apr 83 to 29 Apr 97. From 30 Apr 97 to
29 Apr 98 he was credited with a total of 49 points, which is 1 point
short of a satisfactory year. Subsequent to this time, the applicant
has earned sufficient points to be credited with a satisfactory year
of Federal service for the R/R year 30 Apr 98 to 29 Apr 99. As of 29
Apr 99, the applicant has accumulated a total of 15 satisfactory years
of Federal service.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, stated that
for the R/R year 30 Apr 97 to 29 Apr 98, the applicant earned 0 active
duty (AD) points, 34 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 0 Extension
Course Institute (ECI) points, 15 membership points, 49 total and
retirement points, and an unsatisfactory year of Federal service. For
an R/R year to be satisfactory, a Reservist must earn a minimum of 50
points. The 34 IDT points were for paid IDT periods performed prior
to the applicant’s transfer to the IMA program. The applicant was
transferred to a participating status as an IMA and was eligible to
participate for points from 18 Feb 98 until the end of his R/R year on
29 Apr 98.
DP indicated that in accordance with the governing Air Force manual, a
year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement is awarded when a
member earns a minimum of 50 points in their full R/R year. It has
never been the Air Force Reserve or ANG policy to award satisfactory
Federal service based on the fiscal year.
DP recommended the application be disapproved. The applicant did not
provide documentation to support his claim of a paperwork error. His
master personnel record does not show any changes to the applicant’s
original orders, nor does it show the orders were late in transferring
him from the ANG to IMA program (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 10
May 1999 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After a careful review of
the evidence of record, we note that, except for the
retirement/retention period in question, the applicant had earned
sufficient points to be credited with 15 satisfactory years of Federal
service. In our opinion, the evidence indicates that the applicant
was diligent in maintaining his point credit and that circumstances
beyond his control prevented him from completing a satisfactory year
of service during his transition from the Air National Guard to the
Air Force Reserve Individual Mobilization Augmentee program. In view
of the circumstances of the case, we conclude that any doubt should be
resolved in the applicant’s favor and that his record be corrected as
indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was credited with
an additional 1 nonpaid inactive duty training point during the
retirement/retention year 30 April 1997 to 29 April 1998, resulting in
50 total points; and, that the period 30 April 1997 to 29 April 1998
is a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 24 August 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia d. Vestal, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Mar 99.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DP, dated 20 Apr 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 10 May 99.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-00690
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was credited
with an additional 1 nonpaid inactive duty training point during the
retirement/retention year 30 April 1997 to 29 April 1998, resulting in
50 total points; and, that the period 30 April 1997 to 29 April 1998
is a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
If this had been a good year, he would have been eligible for the RRL when he was considered for separation [in 90] and his case would have been reviewed as a retirement-in-lieu-of- discharge case. The applicant’s military personnel records, to include documents pertaining to the administrative discharge board and the AF/DRB appeals, are provided at Exhibit B. JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03240 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 9 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02 146 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: cords of the Department of the Air Force relating e corrected to show that he...
The Reserve Order, dated 6 May 98, assigning the applicant to the numbered MSS showed an R/R date of 18 Sep. After an audit of his Master Personnel Record, his R/R date was changed to 22 Sep. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded five non-pay points for R/R year 22 Sep 97 to 21 Sep 98 in order to have this year credited as a good year toward retirement. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the...
According to HQ ARPC/DPP, he has 43 points for R/R Mar 99-Mar 00; 50 points are needed for a satisfactory year. The applicant did complete the F/Y 99 requirement of 12 active duty (AD) points and 48 IDT by participating for 10 points during Sep 99; however, these points were actually the first points earned for his 8 Mar-7 Mar 00 R/R year. Before his R/R date was ever changed, he had completed all training day and active duty requirements, based on the information he had at the time, by Feb 99.
AFBCMR 98-02715 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Corr'ection of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that he was c inactive duty trainlng points during the retirement/retention year 20 August 1997 through 19 August 1998,...
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, reviewed the application and states that in early October 1992, the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section after being tr (NARS) from the National Guard, applicant applied dual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) and was approve program assignment. However, when the process of reassignment started, there was a four-month delay causing the applicant's inability to perform in his unit and earn the required number of retirement...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00160 INDEX CODE: 135 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the appropriate credit, to include his time served in the Civil Air Patrol (CAP), to complete 20 years of satisfactory Federal service for retirement pay at age 60. This order was issued two years after the effective date,...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...