RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00160
INDEX CODE: 135
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive the appropriate credit, to include his time served in the
Civil Air Patrol (CAP), to complete 20 years of satisfactory Federal
service for retirement pay at age 60.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR).
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, reviewed the
application and states that no documentation was found, nor did the
applicant submit any, to indicate he participated in the Civil Air
Patrol (CAP) to allow awarding satisfactory Federal service.
Applicant submits Letters of Testimony; however, these letters are not
sufficient to award satisfactory service. HQ ARPC/DP recommends
disapproval to this portion of applicant’s request.
The assignment order, dated 11 February 1982, reassigned the applicant
from NARS-NA (non-affiliated, non-obligated) to NARS-NC (Sanctuary)
effective 22 March 1980. This order was issued two years after the
effective date, indicating that the applicant was not notified of the
transfer, or of his being allowed the opportunity to participate to
complete 20 years of satisfactory service and receive retired pay at
age 60. HQ ARPC/DP recommends the applicant be credited with the
appropriate points for the retirement year ending (RYE) 21 March 1982
and 21 March 1983, to reach a total of 20 years of satisfactory
Federal service.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 22 March 1999 for review and response. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice warranting partial relief.
We note that when the applicant was reassigned to the Nonaffiliated
Reserve Section (NARS-NC) (Sanctuary), with an effective date of
22 March 1980, it appears that he was not aware at that time that he
was allowed three years to earn two satisfactory years of service or
two years to earn one satisfactory year of service to be eligible for
retired pay at age 60. In fact, the orders reassigning him were not
issued until two years after the effective date which indicate that
the applicant was not notified of the transfer. Based on the above,
we are in agreement with the recommendation of the Air Force.
Therefore, we recommend applicant's records be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice to applicant’s remaining
request. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and
applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded
Reserve points for participation in the Civil Air Patrol (CAP). His
contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find these
uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. We
note the Letters of Testimony that the applicant submitted; however,
he submits no official documentation to indicate he participated while
he was assigned to CAP. HQ ARPC/DP also states that there is no
documentation in the applicant’s record or the state CAP files to show
he participated. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the
Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he
has suffered either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief to this portion of
applicant’s request.
____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The Reserve Order CB-227, dated 8 June 1983, be rescinded.
b. He was credited with 35 nonpaid Inactive Duty Training (IDT)
points and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year
22 March 1981 to 21 March 1982, resulting in 50 total points; and,
that the period 22 March 1981 to 21 March 1982 is a year of
satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
c. He was credited with 35 nonpaid IDT points and 15 membership
points during the retirement/retention year 22 March 1982 to 21 March
1983, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the period 22 March 1982
to 21 March 1983 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for
retirement.
d. He applied for, and was transferred to the Retired Reserve
effective 22 March 1983, by reason of having completed 20 years
towards retirement for pay at age 60 under United States Code, Title
10, Section 12731.
____________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 27 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Oscar A. Goldfarb, Panel Chair
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jan 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DP, dated 5 Mar 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 22 Mar 99.
OSCAR A. GOLDFARB
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 135
AFBCMR 99-00160
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. The Reserve Order CB-227, dated 8 June 1983, be, and hereby
is, rescinded.
b. He was credited with 35 nonpaid Inactive Duty Training
(IDT) points and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year
22 March 1981 to 21 March 1982, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the
period 22 March 1981 to 22 March 1982 is a year of satisfactory Federal
service for retirement.
c. He was credited with 35 nonpaid IDT points and 15
membership points during the retirement/retention year 22 March 1982 to 21
March 1983, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the period 22 March
1982 to 21 March 1983 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for
retirement.
d. He applied for, and was transferred to the Retired Reserve
effective 22 March 1983, by reason of having completed 20 years towards
retirement for pay at age 60 under United States Code, Title 10, Section
12731.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03257
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, reviewed the application and states that in early October 1992, the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section after being tr (NARS) from the National Guard, applicant applied dual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) and was approve program assignment. However, when the process of reassignment started, there was a four-month delay causing the applicant's inability to perform in his unit and earn the required number of retirement...
Subsequent to this time, the applicant has earned sufficient points to be credited with a satisfactory year of Federal service for the R/R year 30 Apr 98 to 29 Apr 99. DP indicated that in accordance with the governing Air Force manual, a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement is awarded when a member earns a minimum of 50 points in their full R/R year. After a careful review of the evidence of record, we note that, except for the retirement/retention period in question, the...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-02013
Due to the fact that the member was assigned to the Nonobligated-Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS), HQ ARPC/DPJA was responsible for notifying the applicant of the board convening dates. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, it appears the applicant was unaware that he would be competing for promotion at the FY97 and FY98 Air Force Reserve Major Boards. We believe this action is required in order to provide him with an...
Due to the fact that the member was assigned to the Nonobligated-Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS), HQ ARPC/DPJA was responsible for notifying the applicant of the board convening dates. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, it appears the applicant was unaware that he would be competing for promotion at the FY97 and FY98 Air Force Reserve Major Boards. We believe this action is required in order to provide him with an...
There are currently no provisions of law for officers promoted to the grades of lieutenant colonel and above, who are medically disqualified for worldwide duty, to retire in grade with less than three years satisfactory service. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be retired from the U. S. Air Force Reserve in the higher grade of colonel. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the...
According to HQ ARPC/DPP, he has 43 points for R/R Mar 99-Mar 00; 50 points are needed for a satisfactory year. The applicant did complete the F/Y 99 requirement of 12 active duty (AD) points and 48 IDT by participating for 10 points during Sep 99; however, these points were actually the first points earned for his 8 Mar-7 Mar 00 R/R year. Before his R/R date was ever changed, he had completed all training day and active duty requirements, based on the information he had at the time, by Feb 99.
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01706 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and"having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: rtment of the Air The pertinen be corrected to Force relating to show that she...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DPP, reviewed this application and indicated that according to Title 10, USC, Section 12731a, a member who completes at least 15 years of satisfactory service and no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability is eligible for retirement. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...