Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803481
Original file (9803481.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  98-03481
                                  INDEX CODE 108.01 108.04 108.10
      XXXXXXXXX                         COUNSEL: No

      XXXXXXXXX                         HEARING DESIRED: No


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His length of  service  (LOS)  retirement  be  changed  to  a  medical
retirement.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 17 July 1997, the  applicant,  a  hazardous  materials  technician,
requested voluntary retirement effective 1 December 1998. According to
the available medical records, signs of multiple sclerosis  (MS)  were
first noted by the    Medical Group at    AFB,   , on 24  March  1998;
systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE) was considered.  Following  an  MRI
exam on 15 September 1998 by a civilian facility,  the  applicant  was
ultimately diagnosed as having MS. He was voluntarily retired for  LOS
on 1 December 1998 in the grade of master sergeant with 20  years  and
11 days of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are  contained  in  the  letter
prepared by the appropriate office of  the  Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of  Proceedings.


_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that there is  no  question  the
applicant was not properly  evaluated  and  diagnosed  in  the  period
between March and August  1998  while  he  was  in    .  Although  the
applicant’s condition was not one causing  inability  to  perform  his
military duties at the  time  of  retirement,  MS  is  one  of  a  few
conditions that carries a minimum rating  of  30%,  according  to  the
VASRD. Had the applicant been properly diagnosed, he should have  been
presented  to  a  Medical  Evaluation   Board   (MEB)   with   further
consideration in the disability evaluation system (DES),  which  would
then have been obligated to retire him with a 30%  disability,  either
temporarily or permanently.  The Consultant recommends  that  the  LOS
retirement should be changed to a medical retirement, 30%, under VASRD
Code 8018, MS.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

The Chief, Special Actions/BCMR Advisories, HQ AFPC/DPPD, acknowledges
that the limited records clearly reflect  he  was  diagnosed  with  MS
prior to his  approved  voluntary  LOS  retirement  date.   The  Chief
verifies that the applicant was never referred to or considered by the
DES. However, AFPC/DPPD submitted the entire case file to the Informal
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The IPEB determined  that,  although
the applicant was diagnosed with MS while on active duty, it does  not
appear that his condition  was  serious  enough  that  he  would  have
overcome the presumption of fitness. The applicant has not shown  that
he was unfit due to a physical  disability  under  the  provisions  of
Chapter 61, Title 10, USC, at the time of his voluntary LOS retirement
and denial is recommended.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant’s nephew  provided  a  statement,  which  the  applicant
signed.  The applicant also submitted another rebuttal to  the  AFBCMR
Staff, as well as his Senator, at a later date. Essentially, if a  MRI
and spinal tap had been performed [while he was on active duty] as  he
had requested the MS would have been diagnosed in the Spring  of  1998
and treatment started. Today, he is totally disabled and unemployable.
He is currently waiting for the Department of Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)
to review and increase his disability rating. He  provides  additional
DVA documents.

The applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, are  at  Exhibit
F.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice  to  warrant  relief.  We
note  that  HQ  AFPC/DPPD  disagreed  with  the  Medical  Consultant’s
recommendation  for  a  30%  disability  retirement.   However,  after
careful   consideration,   we   conclude   that    the    Consultant’s
recommendation and his rationale therefor appears to be the  one  most
supported by the evidence of record. The applicant has not stated what
specific percentage, if any, he believes is warranted for his illness.
However, while he may now have or may ultimately  be  given  a  higher
disability  rating  by  the  DVA,  the  Air  Force  disability  system
stipulates that the percentage must be based on a  member’s  condition
at the time of separation.  The Medical Consultant  advises  that  the
diagnosis of MS was confirmed prior to the applicant’s retirement  but
his condition at the time of retirement would  not  have  warranted  a
higher evaluation than 30%. Therefore, in order to preclude a possible
injustice,  we  agree  with  the  Consultant’s  suggested  relief  and
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:

      a.  On 29 November 1998, he  was  found  unfit  to  perform  the
duties of his office, rank, grade or  rating  by  reason  of  physical
disability incurred while entitled to  receive  basic  pay;  that  the
diagnosis in his case is Multiple Sclerosis, disability rating 30%, VA
code 8018; that the disability was permanent; that the disability  was
not due  to  intentional  misconduct  or  willful  neglect;  that  the
disability was not incurred during a period of  unauthorized  absence;
that the disability was not  incurred  during  a  period  of  national
emergency; and that the disability was not received in line of duty as
a direct result of armed conflict.

      b.  He was not released from active duty on 30 November 1998 and
retired for length of service on 1 December 1998, but  on  30 November
1998 his name was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 14 December 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                  Ms. Patricia D. Zarodkiewicz, Panel Chair
                  Ms. Patricia J. Vestal, Member
                  Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Dec 98, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 Jun 99.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 15 Jul 99.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Aug 99.
   Exhibit F.  Letters, Applicant, dated 22 Aug, 20 & 28 Oct 99,
                       w/atchs.




                                   PATRICIA D. ZARODKIEWICZ
                                   Panel Chair

AFBCMR 98-03481


MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:

           a.  On 29 November 1998, he was found unfit to perform the
duties of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical
disability incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the
diagnosis in his case is Multiple Sclerosis, disability rating 30%, VA
code 8018; that the disability was permanent; that the disability was
not due to intentional misconduct or willful neglect; that the
disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence;
that the disability was not incurred during a period of national
emergency; and that the disability was not received in line of duty as
a direct result of armed conflict.

           b.  He was not released from active duty on 30 November
1998 and retired for length of service on 1 December 1998, but on 30
November 1998 his name was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired
List.





JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9901548

    Original file (9901548.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01548 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be processed through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed the application and states that a Medical Evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585A

    Original file (BC-2001-03585A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD states, in part, that the findings and recommendation of the FPEB along with the applicant’s rebuttal for a permanent retirement were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for adjudication and SAFPC recommended that she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60% rating. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802892

    Original file (9802892.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Statement of Understanding, dated 14 November 1995 indicates that upon promotion to the grade of captain, applicant would incur a one-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) from the effective date of promotion. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Promotion Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, states that the applicant was denied promotion to the grade of captain due to her inability to complete the one-year active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103585

    Original file (0103585.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803452

    Original file (9803452.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states that following separation, the applicant was seen in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) system where a follow-up x-ray actually showed a healing stress fracture of the left tibial metaphysis and he was awarded 10% disability based on this finding. Had a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) been accomplished with the proper diagnosis (stress fracture of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800154

    Original file (9800154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    and Exhibit 1, provides the member be rated for each disability and disabling condition. In regard to the applicant's contention that the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) did not consider additional medical addendum and tests scheduled prior to the 24 July 1996 Board, it appears that even though the electrocochleography (ECOG) was not considered by the FPEB, they did consider the applicant's symptoms of chronic disequilibrium and found it not unfitting and, therefore, not ratable or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9300292

    Original file (9300292.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of error or irregularity in che award of Ehis rating given the applicant’s condition at that point in time. The Medical 2 .‘ consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and the application should be denied. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit I. AFBCMR 93-00292 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a copy of applicant’s bone density report (see Exhibit K) .

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101553

    Original file (0101553.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 May 97, an MEB found the applicant not world-wide qualified and recommended she be referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). He diagnosed her as having a personality disorder, not otherwise specified, and recommended administrative separation. On 9 Nov 98, the IPEB found her fit with an adjustment disorder which existed prior to service (EPTS) at the USAFA and recommended she be returned to duty.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801822

    Original file (9801822.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records (Exhibit B), are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force (Exhibits C, D, E and F). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, a majority of the Board concludes that no relief is warranted. As he had no unfitting condition, the majority of the Board agrees with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that consideration...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801559

    Original file (9801559.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 January 1997, the AMW commander recommended the RILO request be denied and, if accepted, the applicant be given a UOTHC discharge. The applicant was discharged with a UOTHC discharge effective 10 January 1998, resignation for the good of the service in lieu of CM for other offense, after 9 years, 4 months and 29 days of active duty. The SAFPC found that the depression was not the cause of the misconduct for which the CM charges were pending but was, rather, a result of the...