RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03481
INDEX CODE 108.01 108.04 108.10
XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: No
XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His length of service (LOS) retirement be changed to a medical
retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 July 1997, the applicant, a hazardous materials technician,
requested voluntary retirement effective 1 December 1998. According to
the available medical records, signs of multiple sclerosis (MS) were
first noted by the Medical Group at AFB, , on 24 March 1998;
systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE) was considered. Following an MRI
exam on 15 September 1998 by a civilian facility, the applicant was
ultimately diagnosed as having MS. He was voluntarily retired for LOS
on 1 December 1998 in the grade of master sergeant with 20 years and
11 days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that there is no question the
applicant was not properly evaluated and diagnosed in the period
between March and August 1998 while he was in . Although the
applicant’s condition was not one causing inability to perform his
military duties at the time of retirement, MS is one of a few
conditions that carries a minimum rating of 30%, according to the
VASRD. Had the applicant been properly diagnosed, he should have been
presented to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) with further
consideration in the disability evaluation system (DES), which would
then have been obligated to retire him with a 30% disability, either
temporarily or permanently. The Consultant recommends that the LOS
retirement should be changed to a medical retirement, 30%, under VASRD
Code 8018, MS.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The Chief, Special Actions/BCMR Advisories, HQ AFPC/DPPD, acknowledges
that the limited records clearly reflect he was diagnosed with MS
prior to his approved voluntary LOS retirement date. The Chief
verifies that the applicant was never referred to or considered by the
DES. However, AFPC/DPPD submitted the entire case file to the Informal
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The IPEB determined that, although
the applicant was diagnosed with MS while on active duty, it does not
appear that his condition was serious enough that he would have
overcome the presumption of fitness. The applicant has not shown that
he was unfit due to a physical disability under the provisions of
Chapter 61, Title 10, USC, at the time of his voluntary LOS retirement
and denial is recommended.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant’s nephew provided a statement, which the applicant
signed. The applicant also submitted another rebuttal to the AFBCMR
Staff, as well as his Senator, at a later date. Essentially, if a MRI
and spinal tap had been performed [while he was on active duty] as he
had requested the MS would have been diagnosed in the Spring of 1998
and treatment started. Today, he is totally disabled and unemployable.
He is currently waiting for the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)
to review and increase his disability rating. He provides additional
DVA documents.
The applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit
F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant relief. We
note that HQ AFPC/DPPD disagreed with the Medical Consultant’s
recommendation for a 30% disability retirement. However, after
careful consideration, we conclude that the Consultant’s
recommendation and his rationale therefor appears to be the one most
supported by the evidence of record. The applicant has not stated what
specific percentage, if any, he believes is warranted for his illness.
However, while he may now have or may ultimately be given a higher
disability rating by the DVA, the Air Force disability system
stipulates that the percentage must be based on a member’s condition
at the time of separation. The Medical Consultant advises that the
diagnosis of MS was confirmed prior to the applicant’s retirement but
his condition at the time of retirement would not have warranted a
higher evaluation than 30%. Therefore, in order to preclude a possible
injustice, we agree with the Consultant’s suggested relief and
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 29 November 1998, he was found unfit to perform the
duties of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical
disability incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the
diagnosis in his case is Multiple Sclerosis, disability rating 30%, VA
code 8018; that the disability was permanent; that the disability was
not due to intentional misconduct or willful neglect; that the
disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence;
that the disability was not incurred during a period of national
emergency; and that the disability was not received in line of duty as
a direct result of armed conflict.
b. He was not released from active duty on 30 November 1998 and
retired for length of service on 1 December 1998, but on 30 November
1998 his name was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 14 December 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Zarodkiewicz, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia J. Vestal, Member
Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Dec 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 Jun 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 15 Jul 99.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Aug 99.
Exhibit F. Letters, Applicant, dated 22 Aug, 20 & 28 Oct 99,
w/atchs.
PATRICIA D. ZARODKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-03481
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. On 29 November 1998, he was found unfit to perform the
duties of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical
disability incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the
diagnosis in his case is Multiple Sclerosis, disability rating 30%, VA
code 8018; that the disability was permanent; that the disability was
not due to intentional misconduct or willful neglect; that the
disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence;
that the disability was not incurred during a period of national
emergency; and that the disability was not received in line of duty as
a direct result of armed conflict.
b. He was not released from active duty on 30 November
1998 and retired for length of service on 1 December 1998, but on 30
November 1998 his name was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired
List.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01548 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be processed through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed the application and states that a Medical Evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585A
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD states, in part, that the findings and recommendation of the FPEB along with the applicant’s rebuttal for a permanent retirement were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for adjudication and SAFPC recommended that she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60% rating. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
The Statement of Understanding, dated 14 November 1995 indicates that upon promotion to the grade of captain, applicant would incur a one-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) from the effective date of promotion. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Promotion Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, states that the applicant was denied promotion to the grade of captain due to her inability to complete the one-year active duty...
The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states that following separation, the applicant was seen in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) system where a follow-up x-ray actually showed a healing stress fracture of the left tibial metaphysis and he was awarded 10% disability based on this finding. Had a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) been accomplished with the proper diagnosis (stress fracture of the...
and Exhibit 1, provides the member be rated for each disability and disabling condition. In regard to the applicant's contention that the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) did not consider additional medical addendum and tests scheduled prior to the 24 July 1996 Board, it appears that even though the electrocochleography (ECOG) was not considered by the FPEB, they did consider the applicant's symptoms of chronic disequilibrium and found it not unfitting and, therefore, not ratable or...
There is no evidence of error or irregularity in che award of Ehis rating given the applicant’s condition at that point in time. The Medical 2 .‘ consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and the application should be denied. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit I. AFBCMR 93-00292 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a copy of applicant’s bone density report (see Exhibit K) .
On 19 May 97, an MEB found the applicant not world-wide qualified and recommended she be referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). He diagnosed her as having a personality disorder, not otherwise specified, and recommended administrative separation. On 9 Nov 98, the IPEB found her fit with an adjustment disorder which existed prior to service (EPTS) at the USAFA and recommended she be returned to duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records (Exhibit B), are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force (Exhibits C, D, E and F). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, a majority of the Board concludes that no relief is warranted. As he had no unfitting condition, the majority of the Board agrees with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that consideration...
On 21 January 1997, the AMW commander recommended the RILO request be denied and, if accepted, the applicant be given a UOTHC discharge. The applicant was discharged with a UOTHC discharge effective 10 January 1998, resignation for the good of the service in lieu of CM for other offense, after 9 years, 4 months and 29 days of active duty. The SAFPC found that the depression was not the cause of the misconduct for which the CM charges were pending but was, rather, a result of the...