RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02892
INDEX CODE: 129
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She receive a waiver of a one-year active duty service commitment
(ADSC) to allow retirement in the higher grade of captain.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was selected for promotion to the grade of captain on 11 September
1995 by the Calendar Year 1995 (CY95) Central Captain Selection Board
with a projected effective date of 8 April 1996. However, she was
diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in December
1995. She met a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and it was determined
that she was unfit for continued active duty and was recommended for
retirement on 13 March 1996. Because the Secretary of the Air Force
message was dated 26 days before her projected promotion, she was
denied promotion.
In support of her request, applicant submits numerous attachments, to
include Letters of Congratulations/Appreciation, Officer Performance
Reports (OPRs), Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), Outstanding
Performance Award and a Statement of Understanding, dated 14 November
1995.
Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the Reserve of the Air
Force on 8 April 1992 and ordered to extended active duty.
Applicant was selected for promotion to the grade of captain by the
CY95 Central Captain Selection Board with a projected date of rank
(DOR) of 8 April 1996. The Statement of Understanding, dated 14
November 1995 indicates that upon promotion to the grade of captain,
applicant would incur a one-year active duty service commitment (ADSC)
from the effective date of promotion.
While serving in the grade of first lieutenant, applicant met a
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) on 20 December 1995. The Medical Board
Report, dated 11 January 1996 considered all evidence and established
a diagnosis of “Laboratory Supported Definite Multiple Sclerosis” with
approximate date of origin of March 1995. The MEB recommended the
applicant’s case be forwarded to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board
(IPEB). On 6 February 1996, the IPEB concurred with the original
diagnosis and recommended the applicant be placed on the Temporary
Disability Retirement List (TDRL) with a compensable percentage of
30%. On 22 February 1996, applicant did not agree with the findings
and recommended disposition of the IPEB and requested a formal
hearing. However, on 6 March 1996, having received an explanation of
the findings and recommendations of the IPEB by her counsel, the
applicant waived her request for a formal PEB hearing. On 13 March
1996, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the applicant be
placed on the TDRL under the provisions of 10 USC 1202.
Special Order No. ACD-995, dated 29 March 1996, reflected that
effective 7 May 1996, applicant was relieved from active duty and
placed on the TDRL, effective 8 May 1996, in the retired pay grade of
first lieutenant per AFI 36-3212.
On 17 September 1997, applicant was reevaluated by the IPEB and the
recommended disposition was Permanent Retirement with a compensable
percentage of 50%. Applicant concurred with the recommended findings
on 6 October 1997.
The Secretary of the Air Force directed that applicant’s name be
removed from the TDRL, and permanently retired under the provisions of
10 USC 1201.
Special Order No. ACD-64, dated 14 October 1997, reflects that
effective 3 November 1997, applicant was removed from the TDRL and
retired in the grade of first lieutenant with a compensable rating of
50% for physical disability, and assigned to the retired Reserve in
the grade of first lieutenant.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Officer Promotion Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, states that the
applicant was denied promotion to the grade of captain due to her
inability to complete the one-year active duty service commitment
(ADSC) associated with promotion.
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1372, which was in effect when
the applicant was retired, did not allow for retirement in the higher
grade. Although the USC was amended in September 1996 to allow for
retirement in the higher grade, the law was not retroactive.
During this time period, the Air Force was waiving ADSCs for voluntary
separations/retirements under the Limited Active Duty Service
Commitment Program (LADSCP) to meet Congressionally mandated end-
strength requirements. However, the program only allowed for waiving
six months of the one year ADSC for promotion to captain. Applicant
would only have had one month time-in-grade as a captain when
medically retired on 8 May 1996.
The laws in effect at the time of the applicant’s medical retirement
preclude retirement as a captain. Although LADSCP allowed for waiving
promotion ADSCs under other circumstances, the applicant would not
have been able to meet the waived ADSC requirements. They recommend
the application be denied.
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
14 December 1998 for review and response. Applicant responded and
states, in summary, that the cancellation of her promotion after the
Medical Evaluation Board’s proceedings, and the military policy on
retiring members with multiple sclerosis, produced an injustice she
hopes can be rectified. Applicant states that she is not looking for
more money, she simply wants to be able to refer to herself as a
retired captain, the rank she earned and in which she would have
faithfully carried out her duties had she been retained by the Air
Force.
A copy of the applicant’s response, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We have thoroughly reviewed
the evidence of record and the documentation submitted by the
applicant. Although we find no error in the applicant’s disability
retirement processing and compensable disability rating, we do believe
there is an injustice to the applicant. We note that she was selected
for promotion to the grade of captain by the Calendar Year 1995 (CY95)
Central Captain Selection Board that convened on 11 September 1995.
However, when she received her promotion sequence number, her
projected date of rank was 8 April 1996. Because of her medical
diagnosis in December 1995, she was recommended for a medical
retirement on 13 March 1996, just one month prior to her assuming the
grade of captain. A statement by her Commander, Air Mobility Command,
indicates that the applicant was working full days without any
indication of physical disability and was fully engaged through the
date of his (Commander’s) departure from Travis Air Force Base on 3
May 1996. We are unable to determine if the applicant would have been
able to continue to perform her duties and fulfill her active duty
service commitment required for the promotion. We do note that the
applicant was a distinguished graduate of the Undergraduate Missile
Training course and it appears that she was a stellar performer
throughout her short career. We therefore believe that to deny her
promotion and allow retirement in the lower grade of first lieutenant
would be an injustice. Therefore, in view of the above, we recommend
her records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. She was not found unfit on 13 March 1996 and placed on the
Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), but continued to serve on
active duty.
b. She was promoted to the grade of captain, effective and with a
date of rank of 8 April 1996.
c. On 7 May 1996, she was found unfit to perform the duties of
her office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical disability
incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in
her case was clinically definite multiple sclerosis, VA code 8018-
8105, rated at thirty percent; that the disability may be permanent.
d. On 8 May 1996, her name was placed on the TDRL, in the grade
of captain, and as an exception to policy, competent authority waived
her active duty service commitment.
e. On 3 November 1997, her name was removed from the TDRL and she
was permanently retired in the grade of captain, by reason of physical
disability with a compensable rating of fifty percent.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 15 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Ms. Ann L. Heidig, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, dated 17 Nov 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Dec 98.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 21 Dec 98.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-02892
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. She was not found unfit on 13 March 1996 and placed on
the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), but continued to serve
on active duty.
b. She was promoted to the grade of captain, effective
and with a date of rank of 8 April 1996.
c. On 7 May 1996, she was found unfit to perform the
duties of her office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical
disability incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the
diagnosis in her case was clinically definite multiple sclerosis, VA
code 8018-8105, rated at thirty percent; that the disability may be
permanent.
d. On 8 May 1996, her name was placed on the TDRL, in the
grade of captain, and as an exception to policy, competent authority
waived her active duty service commitment.
e. On 3 November 1997, her name was removed from the TDRL
and she was permanently retired in the grade of captain, by reason of
physical disability with a compensable rating of fifty percent.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585A
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD states, in part, that the findings and recommendation of the FPEB along with the applicant’s rebuttal for a permanent retirement were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for adjudication and SAFPC recommended that she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60% rating. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02671
She was granted a 60% evaluation because of her appeal but she is 100% disabled and unable to obtain employment. The Medical Consultant states a review of her service medical records show that at the time of permanent disability disposition, formal psychometric testing indicated her cognitive disorder produced a "considerable" Social and Industrial Adaptability Impairment that correlates with a 50% rating in the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04059
On 19 August 2008, the IPEB found the applicant fit and recommended Return to Duty, finding the medical condition "does not prevent you from reasonably performing the duties of your office, grade, rank or rating." Therefore, the Medical Consultant concludes the applicant's MS was not a medically unfitting condition at the time of separation and proper administrative procedures followed for determining fitness for duty. Exhibit G. Letter, Counsel, dated 26 May 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00295
The applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, General Law Division, HQ USAF/JAG, noted that Section 2005 provides for recoupment if a member fails to complete the ADSC voluntarily or due to misconduct. On 14 Aug 01, DFAS-POCC/DE advised the applicant that, based on her placement on the TDRL, it was inappropriate at this time to recoup monies which might not be owed if...
On 31 October 1996, the Secretary of the Air Force agreed with the findings of the IPEB and directed the applicant's permanent retirement, with a 30 percent disability rating. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated that the applicant served his last five years of military service with a severe eating disorder that resulted in excessive weight loss and physical disability that was thoroughly evaluated at Wilford Hall Medical Center in 1994. Accordingly, we recommend that...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: - The AFBCMR Chief Medical Consultant reviewed this application and is of the opinion that no change In the records is warranted and the application should be d e n i m . *at Based on the medical evidence provided, the IPEB found her condition nad stabilized and recommended thar she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired w i t h a 40% disability rating. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated Exhibit D .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9800284
The Board, consisting of Ms. Taylor and Messrs. Swarens and Zsalman reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 April 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Specialty Leader recommended that Petitioner's request be granted, as it is clear that the episode of optic neuritis was the initial manifestation of her disease. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023034
Orders 311-0916, dated 7 November 2005, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Gordon, GA, retired her from active duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay effective 5 February 2006 and placed her on the TDRL in the rank of SGT effective 6 February 2006. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20c, states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01161 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that she was honorably discharged rather than retired on Temporary Disability on 27 January...