c .
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 97-00826
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF’ OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
1996.
ent of the Air Force
be considered for
ection Board for the
nvened on 9 September
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
U
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-00826
COUNSEL: NONE
OCT 2 2 5991
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
He be granted a waiver for the six-month active duty requirement
for promotion consideration to the grade of captain (0-3); and,
that his name be added to the FY97 captain promotion list.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had enough time-in-grade to meet the September 1996 Captain
Promotion Board, but he did not have six months on active duty.
If the active duty requirement is waived, he would be eligible
for promotion to captain upon completion of his two years time-
in-grade as a first lieutenant (0-2).
In support of his request, applicant submits copies of his
Statement of Service, NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and
Record of Service), DD Form 214, and additional documents
associated with the issues cited in his contentions (Exhibit A).
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the applicant's submission indicates
that on 16 October 1992, he was appointed a second lieutenant
Air National Guard m A N G ) , Reserve of the Air Force
nd was subsequently promoted to first lieutenant (02),
ANG, ResAF, with the date of rank of 20 April 1995. On 27
ch 1993, the applicant entered active duty for the purpose of
attending training. On 30 March 1995,, he was released from
required active duty training, under the provisions of AFR 35-41,
Vol I1 (completion of active duty), with 2 years and 4 days of
active duty service at the time of release.
ly 1996, applicant was relieved from his assignment with
ANG and honorably discharged from the W A N G , ResAF. He
pleted a total of 3 years, 8 months and 17 days of service
at the time of his separation. Effective 3 July 1996, he was
appointed in the Regular Air Force and entered into extended
.
active duty (EAD) on 6 July 1996 in the grade of first
lieutenant, with the date of rank of 9 July 1995.
Through further research with HQ AFPC/DPPPO, they indicated that
the CY96 Captain Line Board convened on 9 September 1996.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPPO,
stated that the active duty promotion eligibility criteria as
outlined in AFI 36-2501, attachment 2, states "Officers are not
eligible for consideration by a selection board or for promotion
if they: have not been on extended active duty at least six
consecutive months immediately before the central selection
board's convening date." Due to the applicant's EAD of 6 July
1996, he was ineligible to meet the CY96 captain board due to not
having six consecutive months on extended active duty. On 2 May
1997, the Secretary of the Air Force approved eliminating the
six-month EAD requirement for all line first lieutenants meeting
promotion boards when the promotion opportunity is 100 percent.
DPPPO recommended that the applicant's request for a waiver of
the six-month active duty requirement for promotion board
consideration be approved. DPPO recommended that applicant's
request to be added to the CY97 captain promotion list be denied.
If the Board agrees with DPPO's recommendation to waive the
six-month active duty requirement, the applicant should then be
placed before the next available Special Selection Board (SSB)
for promotion consideration to captain by the CY96 Captain Line
Board. The applicant will then be afforded fair and equitable
opportunity for future promotions along with his peers.
In DPPPOIs amended advisory opinion, they indicated that, on
2 May 1997, the Secretary of the Air Force approved eliminating
the six-month EAD requirement f o r all line first lieutenants
meeting promotion boards when the promotion opportunity is 100
percent.
Copies of the evaluations are appended at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
14 April 1997 for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
I
2
9 7 - 0 0 8 2 6
.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
1.
law or regulations.
2 . The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. Having
carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendation of the office of primary responsibility (OPR) that
the
approved.
Notwithstanding, we disagree with the applicant's request for
direct promotion. We believe the applicant will be afforded
proper and fitting relief by meeting a Special Selection Board
(SSB) for promotion consideration to the grade of captain. We
therefore conclude that the applicant's records should be
corrected in the following manner.
applicant's
should
be
waiver
request
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be considered for promotion to the grade of
captain by a Special Selection Board for the CY 1 9 9 6 Central
Captain Selection Board, which convened on 9 September 1 9 9 6 .
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 15 July 1997, under the provisions of AFI
3 6 - 2 6 0 3 :
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chairman
Ms. Sophie A. Clark, Member
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Feb 9 7 , w/atchs.
Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit B.
Exhibit C. Letters, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dated 27 Mar 97 and
25 Jun 9 7 .
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 14 Apr 9 7 .
I
Panel Chairman
3
9 7 - 0 0 8 2 6
D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
U.S. AIR FORCE
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
HQ AFPCDPPPO
550 C Street West Suite 8
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4710
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Correction of Military Reco
2 7 M ~ 7 - 1 9 9 7
Requested Action. Applicant requests waiver for active duty requirement for promotion to captain
and to be added to the promotion list.
Basis for Request: Applicant bases his request on his contention he had enough time in grade to
meet the September 1996 captain board but did not have six months on active duty.
Discussion:
a. Applicant was separated fiom the ANG on 2 Jul96 as a first lieutenant with a date of Tank of
20 Apr 95. The evidence provided by the applicant suggests he was not considered for promotion in the
ANG. Whether he should have been considered prior to his separation may be best answered by the NGB
and is outside the purview of this advisory.
b. The applicant was accessed into active duty (EAD) on 6 Jul96 as a first lieutenant with a date
of rank (DOR) of 20 Apr 95. This idormation is correct, accurate, and verified. The Voluntary Reserve
Officer EAD Program for Navigators and Electronic Warfitre Officers Information Sheet, paragraph 4b
advised the applicant, “Eligibility for promotion consideration to the next higher grade will depend on the
officer’s established DOR after return to EAD. (1) Timing of return to EAD affects promotion
consideration since an officer is ineligible for promotion unless he or she has served at least six months of
continuous active duty commissioned seMce immediately prior to the board.”
c. The active duty promotion eligibility criteria as outlined in AFI 36-2501, attachment states,
“Officers are not eligible for consideration by a selection board or for promotion if they: (A2.5.3) Have nat
been on extended active duty at least six consecutive months immediately before the central selection
board’s convening date.” Given the DOR of 26 May 95, the applicant would have been normally eligible
and scheduled for promotion consideration by the next available board. However, due to the applicant’s
EAD of 6 Jul96, he was ineligible to meet the CY96 captain board due to not having six consecutive
months on extended active duty. Therefore, the applicant will be scheduled for and will meet the next
available captain selection board or CY97.
d. Further, Title 10, U.S.C, section 616d states, “an officer on the activeduty list m y not be
promoted to a higher grade under this chapter unless he is considered and recommended for promotion to
that grade by a selection board convened under this chapter (chapter 36).” Since the applicant has not been
considered nor recommended for promotion to captain due to eligibility requirements established by AFI
36-250 1, the applicant cannot be promoted to captain.
1
06/25/97
12:13
e 4 8 7 5 5 6 9
c.
AFMPC-PROM DIV
a 002
DEPARTMENT O F THE AtR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
25 Jun 97
FROM: HQ AFPClDPPPO
550 C Sir& West Suite 8
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4710
(
SUBJECT:
Mar 97
Correct information, Applicant was separated fiom the ANG on 2 Jul96 as a ht
lieutenant with a date of rank of 20 Apr 95. The applicant was then ~ ~ s s e d
@AD) on 9 Jul96 as a first lieutenant with a date of rank of9 Jd 95.
into active duty
Update. 2 May 97, SecAF approved ehinatbg the &month EAD requirement for all he
first lieutenants meeting promotion boards when the promotion opportunity is 100 percent.
-GIL
TORRE
OfIEicer Promotion Marragement
Directorate of Personnel Program
-.,
. .? ,
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00042 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: A waiver of the six-month extended active duty eligibility requirement be approved in order for him to be considered for promotion to the grade of major by the CY98B Major Biomedical Sciences Corps (BSC) Central Selection Board, which convened on 6 April 1998. DPPPO stated that although the applicant requests a waiver...
The AFI, as currently written, may make it impossible for commanders to remove officers from promotion lists who have a date of rank and pay date specified earlier than the date of the order that announces the promotion, but that is a concern that should be addressed in re-writing the AFI. In instances where officers receive promotions with dates of rank and effective dates backdated to specific dates, the only period of time when promotion propriety actions can be initiated, is between...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. It would not be in the best interest of the Air Force to give the applicant a date of rank to capthn that is earlier than that of other officers promoted from the CY97B Central Captain...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. On 3 Aug 92, he was appointed a 2nd Lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force, Medical Service Corp (MSC). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
Upon implementation of DOD Directive 1310.1, Rank and Seniority of Commissioned Officers, effective 1 Oct 96, all reserve officers on the Reserve Active Status List in transition from the reserves to active duty, would retain the date of rank they held in their reserve unit. Sections 12207, 12320, 14002, 14003, and 143 17 of reference (b) to establish policies governing the determination of the dates of rank and precedence of commissioned offi- cers on the Reserve Active Status List. at...
A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97 COUNSEL: NONE 01879 HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason f o r his separation be changed to allow eligibility to be considered for a commission in the Air National Guard (ANG); or, eligibility to enlist in the ANG. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s request to change the reason for discharge was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on...
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02137
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and indicated that his senior rater provided a statement indicating the original PRF was in error and subsequently needed to be replaced with a new PRF correcting all the errors. He requests that the Board order the replacement of his original PRF with the reaccomplished PRF, as supported by his former senior rater and MLR president; and, direct promotion to lieutenant colonel as if selected by the CY96...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. Applicant bases his request for changing his DOR on a “missed promotion board.” The applicant entered active duty on 27 Jul97.