RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-03288
INDEX CODE: 135
COUNSEL: ROBERT S. THOMPSON
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to reflect active participation as a Reserve
officer from 11 June 1994 through his Mandatory Separation Date (MSD)
of 17 January 1999, to include back pay and retirements points.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Without the benefit of an Administrative Discharge Board hearing or a
Court-Martial, he was involuntarily discharged from the Texas Air
National Guard on 11 June 1994. Applicant states he had not submitted
an application for termination or resignation, nor was he disabled at
the time. He was not informed that his actions were under review nor
was he provided the opportunity to discuss any of the issues with his
commander or anyone in his chain of command.
In support of his application, applicant submits a time-line of
events, computation of losses, separation documents, letter to the
Governor of Texas, a letter in response to his Memorandum of
Reprimand, and a copy of the Memorandum of Reprimand.
Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the Reserve of the Air
Force on 18 December 1970 and ordered to extended active duty on 19
May 1971 for an indefinite period.
He was subsequently appointed a first lieutenant in the Regular Air
Force on 20 September 1977. Applicant tendered his resignation from
the Regular Air Force which was effective 5 October 1980.
Applicant was appointed a captain in the Reserve of the Air Force on
6 October 1980.
Available documentation reflects that the applicant subsequently
entered the Texas Air National Guard on 8 November 1980.
On 23 January 1992, the applicant was notified by Headquarters Air
Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) that he had completed the required
years of service, under the provisions of Title 10 USC, Section 1331,
and that he would be entitled to retired pay upon application at age
60. The records reflected that the applicant had accrued 4706 points
for retired pay. Applicant indicated that by signing a statement, on
22 May 1992, it constitutes his agreement with retirement points as
stated.
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of
Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas
Air National Guard. The memorandum stated that he was formally
reprimanded for his conduct in connection with the use and maintenance
of the unofficial squadron journal known as the “Hog Log V.” The
Commander’s determination was based upon inquiries conducted by
Colonel P--- of the command, which indicated that the applicant had
knowledge of the existence and contents of that journal. Applicant
submitted a response, undated, to the Letter of Reprimand.
Applicant was subsequently relieved from assignment with the 182d
Fighter Squadron, honorably discharged from the Texas Air National
Guard effective 10 June 1994 and transferred, in the grade of
lieutenant colonel, to the U. S. Air Force Reserve effective 11 June
1994 and assigned to Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ
ARPC). Applicant had 22 years, 11 months and 21 days total service
for pay.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Special Actions & Personal Affairs, ANG/DPPU states that
the applicant was involuntarily separated from the Texas Air National
Guard and was not given the benefit of an administrative hearing prior
to separation. At that time, it had been a long standing
interpretation of the law and regulations that the Adjutant General
(the discharge authority) had plenary authority to discharge officers
from the Texas National Guard; that interpretation was determined
incorrect soon after the applicant’s discharge. Awarding
participation points, back pay and allowances will aid in resolving
the error or injustice suffered by the discharge from the Texas Air
National Guard.
ANG/DPPU recommends relief. They recommend the applicant’s records be
changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for
the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National
Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. The applicant would have
earned 570 points for the period of 11 June 1994 through 17 January
1999, based on the yearly average participation level of 125 points.
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant’s
counsel on 23 October 1998. Counsel responded and stated that he
reviewed the recommendation and concurs with the recommendations as
stated.
Counsel’s response is attached at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice to warrant relief. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission,
we are persuaded that the applicant’s records should be corrected to
reflect constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period
of time following his separation from the Texas Air National Guard
(ANG) through his MSD. It appears that prior to the applicant’s
involuntary separation from the Texas ANG, he was not given the
benefit of an administrative hearing. It was assumed that the
discharge authority had plenary authority to discharge officers from
the Texas ANG; however, that interpretation was determined to be
incorrect after the applicant’s discharge. Both the State of Texas
and the ANG/MPPU agree that the applicant should be awarded
participation points, back pay and allowances to resolve the error or
injustice suffered by the applicant’s discharge from the Texas ANG.
We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air National Guard
that the applicant has suffered either an error or an injustice and
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The Special Order ANG-A 106 TX, dated 5 June 1994, be
changed to read: He is relieved from assignment with the 182d Fighter
Squadron (L71CFTMS), Texas Air National Guard (TXANG), Kelly Air Force
Base, Texas and honorably discharged from the TXANG effective 14
January 1999, and transferred in grade to the USAFR and assigned to
Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) effective 15
January 1999.
b. The Reserve Order RO HB-000256, dated 24 October 1995, be
rescinded.
c. The Reserve Order EK-0601, dated 3 November 1998, be
rescinded and a new order issued to read: He is relieved from HQ ARPC-
NARS-A and placed on the USAFR Retired List effective 16 January 1999.
d. He was credited with an additional 16 paid Active Duty (AD)
points, 28 paid Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points and 15 membership
points during the retirement/retention year 6 October 1993 to
5 October 1994, resulting in 32 AD points, 100 IDT points for a total
of 147 points, 92 retirement points and that the period 6 October 1993
to 5 October 1994 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for
retirement.
e. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT points
and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1994 to 5 October 1995, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 109 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1995 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
f. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT points
and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1995 to 5 October 1996, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 124 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1995 to 5 October 1996 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
g. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT points
and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1996 to 5 October 1997, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 124 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1996 to 5 October 1997 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
h. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT points
and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1997 to 5 October 1998, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 124 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1997 to 5 October 1998 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
i. He was credited with 12 paid AD points, 21 paid IDT points
and 4 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6 October
1998 to 15 January 1999, resulting in 12 AD points, 21 IDT points and
4 membership points for a total of 37 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1998 to 15 January 1999 is a partial year of
satisfactory Federal service.
j. He applied for, and was transferred to the Retired Reserve
Section effective 16 January 1999, by reason of having completed 20
years towards retirement for pay at age 60 under United States Code,
Title 10, Section 12731
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 21 January 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Panel Chair
Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Member
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Nov 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Microfiche Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ANG/MPPU, dated 21 Oct 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Oct 98.
Exhibit E. Counsel’s Letter, dated 17 Nov 98.
DOROTHY P. LOEB
Acting Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 135
AFBCMR 96-03288
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to ---- -. ----, ----, be corrected to show that:
a. The Special Order ANG-A 106 TX, dated 5 June 1994, be
changed to read: He is relieved from assignment with the 182d Fighter
Squadron (L71CFTMS), Texas Air National Guard (TXANG), Kelly Air Force
Base, Texas and honorably discharged from the TXANG effective 14
January 1999, and transferred in grade to the USAFR and assigned to
Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) effective 15
January 1999.
b. The Reserve Order RO HB-000256, dated 24 October 1995,
be, and hereby is, rescinded.
c. The Reserve Order EK-0601, dated 3 November 1998, be,
and hereby is, rescinded and a new order issued to read: He is
relieved from HQ ARPC-NARS-A and placed on the USAFR Retired List
effective 16 January 1999.
d. He was credited with an additional 16 paid Active Duty
(AD) points, 28 paid Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points and 15
membership points during the retirement/retention year 6 October 1993
to 5 October 1994, resulting in 32 AD points, 100 IDT points for a
total of 147 points, 92 retirement points and that the period 6
October 1993 to 5 October 1994 is a year of satisfactory Federal
service for retirement.
e. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT
points and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1994 to 5 October 1995, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 109 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1995 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
f. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT
points and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1995 to 5 October 1996, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 124 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1995 to 5 October 1996 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
g. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT
points and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1996 to 5 October 1997, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 124 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1996 to 5 October 1997 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
h. He was credited with 49 paid AD points, 83 paid IDT
points and 15 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1997 to 5 October 1998, resulting in 49 AD points, 83 IDT
points for a total of 147 points, 124 retirement points and that the
period 6 October 1997 to 5 October 1998 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
i. He was credited with 12 paid AD points, 21 paid IDT
points and 4 membership points during the retirement/retention year 6
October 1998 to 15 January 1999, resulting in 12 AD points, 21 IDT
points and 4 membership points for a total of 37 retirement points and
that the period 6 October 1998 to 15 January 1999 is a partial year of
satisfactory Federal service.
j. He applied for, and was transferred to the Retired
Reserve Section effective 16 January 1999, by reason of having
completed 20 years towards retirement for pay at age 60 under United
States Code, Title 10, Section 12731.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
Subsequent to this time, the applicant has earned sufficient points to be credited with a satisfactory year of Federal service for the R/R year 30 Apr 98 to 29 Apr 99. DP indicated that in accordance with the governing Air Force manual, a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement is awarded when a member earns a minimum of 50 points in their full R/R year. After a careful review of the evidence of record, we note that, except for the retirement/retention period in question, the...
f the Department of the Air Force relating t corrected to show that: , Headquarters ARPC, Denver, Colorado, dated 20 April Reserve position and assigning him to the Inactive b. II c d. His record, as corrected, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB); and, his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the Fiscal Year 1995 (FY95) Reserve of the Air Force Colonel Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132
His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-2004-00368
However, in accordance with Title 37, United States Code, Section 206[e], while a member may be allowed by their commander to perform duty to make up missed Unit Training Assemblies (UTA’s) for retirement points, the duty must be performed within their R/R, or anniversary, year. They state the member made up the time outside the parameters of the affected R/R year making the one point she earned attributable to her next R/R year of 30 January 2003 through 29 January 2004 instead of the...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-03270 COUNSEL: Steven E. McCullough HEARING DESIRED: No JUL 3 1 )898: APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT : He be awarded compensation for back pay and retirement points (based on an average of the three previous calendar years) for the period 3 1 December 1994 through 1 November 1996; promoted to the grade of colonel; and reinstated to the same or similar flying position and duties he had before...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00658
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00658 INDEX CODE: 135.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 August 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect satisfactory service for retirement year ending (RYE) 11 November 1999 by transferring four Inactive Duty for Training (IDT) points he...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-220
This final decision, dated June 12, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a chief health services specialist who was medically retired from the Reserve on April 5, 1997, with a 30% disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), asked the Board to correct her time in service, awards, and Reserve drill points for her inactive duty training (IDT (paid drills)), active duty training (ADT), special active duty training...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00343
Second, he is concerned the Board might consider not granting his request to correct the known errors on the SF-50B as the Board may only correct military records - not civilian records. Based on the evidence of record, had the applicant not been separated, he would have continued to serve in the Air National Guard (ANG). We note applicant’s request that he be promoted to lieutenant colonel three years from the date of the Board.
It is the applicant's and the unit's responsibility to make sure sufficient points are acquired for a satisfactory R/R year. They recommend the application be disapproved because the applicant was aware of the requirement to obtain 5 0 points for a satisfactory retirement year. ' We recommend this application be disapproved because the applicant was aware of the requirement to obtain 50 points for a satisfactory retirement year However, if favorable consideration is made on behalf of the...