DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC OCT 2 7 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-00086
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A
Stat 116), it is directed that:
itary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t
be corrected to show that nine (9) days of leave were add
V
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00086
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Nine (9) days of leave lost in Fiscal Year 1997 (FY97) be
reinstated.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He lost 9 days of leave because of a disapproved retirement
application. He applied f o r retirement in Jul 97. In Sep 97, he
had 9 days to take; however, he informed his commander that he
would not take all the leave in Sep and only work in Oct then be
gone in Nov. On 3 Oct 97, his request for retirement was turned
down. The Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) had known for 2
months; however, the word was slow getting to him. Had he been
notified on time, he would have taken the leave.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter signed
by his squadron and group commanders and a copy of his Military
Leave and Earnings Statement.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
_ _
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
AFBCMR 98-00086
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Commanders' Programs Branch, AFPC/DPSFC, reviewed this
application and indicated that the applicant had 60 days of leave
on 1 Oct 96. He used 2 1 days of leave and had 69 days on 3 0 Sep
He lost 9 days of leave on 1 Oct 97 because Section 701,
9 7 .
Title 10, United States Code (USC), precludes members from
carrying over more than 6 0 days into the next FY.
While
applicant contends that he would have taken the 9 days if he had
known earlier of the retirement disapproval, this is not a valid
reason to carry over more than 60 days of leave into the next FY.
Section 701, Title 10, USC, requires members to take leave
annually as accruing to the extent consistent with military
requirements. When members plan to take terminal leave starting
in NOV, they must take all accrued days in excess of 60 days
before 1 Oct. In this case, DPSFC cannot find the Air Force
culpable because military necessity was not the cause for the
lost leave. They recommend denial of applicant's request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated that,
at no point in his request did he state that the leave was to be
used for terminal leave.
He had plenty of terminal leave
available and he was aware of the 60-day limit for roll-over from
FY to FY. His main point is that AFPC related to him on 3 Oct 97
that they knew approximately 2 months earlier that his retirement
request was going to be disapproved and had he been notified in a
timely manner, he would have had ample time to take his leave
prior to 30 Sep 97.
He did not take the leave because he was
supposed to start his terminal leave on 1 Nov 97 and he did not
want to be gone for 9 days in Sep, work Oct, and then be gone for
good in Nov. He did this in the best interest of his unit. With
AFPC notifying him only 28 days prior to starting his terminal
leave, but being aware of the decision to deny his retirement
request 2 months earlier, he does not feel that he should be made
to suffer this loss. At his current grade, and including his
entitlements, 9 days of leave are worth $859.88 and this is a
substantial loss for trying to do the right thing.
Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit D.
2
AFBCMR 98-00086
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. The
applicant has provided a statement from his commander and
indorsed by his group commander indicating that he applied for
retirement to be effective 1 Feb 98 and for his terminal leave to
start on 3 Nov 9 7 . He did not take the contested leave in the
month of Sep with the best intentions for the squadron knowing
that as of 3 Nov 97, he would be gone for good. However, within
30 days of his scheduled terminal leave, his retirement was
disapproved by AFPC. We note that AFPC knew approximately 2
months earlier that his retirement was not going to be approved;
however, the applicant was not notified of the disapproval until
28 days prior to starting his terminal leave and did not have
It was
ample time to take his leave prior to 30 Sep 9 7 .
adequately demonstrated that the applicant tried to schedule his
leave judiciously. Contrary to the Air Force evaluation which
suggests the applicant gambled that there would be no
contingencies to preclude taking leave by the end-of-year leave
balancing, we find that the applicant tried to schedule his leave
diligently during the time that would have been available to him
but was not notified in a timely manner that his retirement was
disapproved. Absent evidence to the contrary, we find in the
applicant’s favor and recommend that 9 days of leave be restored
to his account.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that nine ( 9 ) days of
leave were added to his current leave account.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 8 October 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Mr. Joseph G . Diamond, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
3
AFBCMR 98-00086
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jan 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSFC, dated 21 Jan 98.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Feb 98.
Exhibit D. Letter fr applicant, undated.
4
& CHARLENE M. rn.ddy
BRADLEY
..
1
Panel Chair
4
DEPARTMENT O F T H E AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N K L C E N T E R
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPSFC
550 C Street West, Ste 37
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4739
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records
>
.
Requested Action and Basis for Request. Reinstate 9 days lost at FY97 year-end
balancing. Applicant states he lost these days because of a disapproved retirement application.
Facts and Discussion. Applicant had 60 days 1 Oct 96, used 21 days, and had 69 days on
30 Sep 97. He lost 9 days on 1 Oct because Title 10 USC 701 precludes members fiom carrying
over more than 60 days into the next FY. He states he did not take the 9 days in Sep because he
was planning to take them as terminal leave starting in Nov in conjunction with retirement.
AFPC disapproved his retirement application on 3 Oct and applicant states he would have taken
the 9 days if he had know earlier of the disapproval, However, this is not a valid reason to carry
over more than 60 days into the next FY. Title 10 USC 704 requires members to take leave
annually as accruing to the extent consistent with military requirements. When members plan to
take terminal leave starting in Nov, they must take all accrued days in excess of 60 days before 1
Oct. In this case, we cannot find the Air Force culpable because military necessity was not the
cause for the lost leave.
Recommendation. Deny because 60 days are the maximum number of days members can
carry over into the next FY under Title 10 USC 701. If the AFBCMR decides to grant relief,
restore 9 days to current leave account.
// 5 ’ / G b 5 & //
Chief, Commanders’ Programs Branch
, ' JUN 3 0 1996 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 0 0 6 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1 5 5 2 , Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that 2 8 days o commencing 2 October 1 9 9 7 ; and, at...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Commanders’ Programs Branch, AFPC/DPSFC, reviewed this application and indicated that although the applicant states that he was unable to take leave in Sep due to short-notice that he had to attend the SNCOA, this is not a valid reason to carry over more than 60 days into FY99. When they schedule leave in Sep, they risk losing days if unable to take the leave due to unforeseen circumstances...
DPSFC stated that, if HQ AFPC/DPPRS agrees, the applicant’s retirement date should be changed from 1 Jul to 1 Sep 98. To grant the applicant additional active duty time to use 77 days of leave, his retirement date would have to be extended by 3 full months. Given the lost opportunity, and the change of circumstances, he was not even able to zero out the leave and permissive TDY days prior to 1 Jul 98.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. He lost 16 days on 1 Oct because Title 10 USC 701 precludes members f?om carrying over more than 60 days into the next FY.
above ‘regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Force relating to q » be corrected to show that 11.5 days of leave be added to hee leave balance commencing 1 October 1998. ' recommendation of the Air Force’ and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant thas been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Applicant had.56.5 days on-1 Oct 96, earned 30 days, and used 15...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP I6 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02155 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that 11.5 da commencing 1 Octo ent of...
Air Force Review Boards Agency AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03509 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Six (6) days of leave lost at FY97 year-end balancing be restored. The Board majority therefore recommends that the applicant's records be corrected to show that six (6) days of leave were restored to her current leave account. The following members of the Board considered this...
nt of the Air be corrected to his J chief Examiher Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUL 1898 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 0 7 2 5 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an...
Restore 8.5 days leave he will lose at FY98 year-end. Applicant had 39.5 days on 1 Oct 97, earned 30, used 1 day in FY98, and will have 68.5 days on 30 Sep 98. Applicant states he has been unable to use leave due to Undergraduate Pilot Training, Air Force Water Survival Training, and Pilot Instructor Training.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02514 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: the The pertinen Force relating to show that five (5) days of leave be added to his leave...