DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
| 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100. ORS
Docket No: 7027-09
10 August 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application ori 29 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 9 October 2007.
You underwent psychological evaluation on 29 October 2007 and
were given a diagnosis of enuresis. On 15 November 2007 you
received an entry level separation due to the enuresis, which was
considered a condition, not a disability, which interfered with
your performance of duty. You were assigned a reentry code of
RE-4, as permitted by regulatory guidance. That code does not
imply that you committed acts of misconduct during your
enlistment, ox that you were discharged by reason of misconduct.
The Board concluded that the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4
was appropriate in your case in view of the basis for your
discharge. The Board carefully considered your contention to the
effect that the enuresis was caused by medications you were
taking, but found it insufficient to demonstrate that it would be
in the interest of justice for the Board to assign you a more
favorable reentry code. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The name and votes of the members of the panel wiil be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1060 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 16 October 2007, you were honorably discharged due to your disability, and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1061 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03747-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06103-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05350-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07636-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07094-09
A three-member panel of the Board.for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08405-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00440-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board concluded that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 ig required when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07502-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on’ 23 September 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was - insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...