Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06939-09
Original file (06939-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DO 20370-5100 .

 

JSR
Docket No. 6939-09
9 July 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

    

Subj: 3% cag:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: {a) 10 0.5.C. 1552

Encl: DD Form 149 dtd 8 Feb 09

HOMC MMER /PERB memo dtd 18 Jun 09
HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 24 Jun 09

1
2
3
4) Subject's naval record

a
a a ee

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 May
2007 to 30 April 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. As
indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)
Performance Evaluation Review Board has directed removing the
contested report. Petitioner further requested removing his
failure of selection by the Fiscal Year 2009 Chief Warrant
Officer 3 (CWO3) Selection Board, so as to be considered by the
selection board next convened to consider officers of his
category for promotion to CWO3 as an officer who has not failed
of selection for promotion to that grade.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and
McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and

regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC
office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s
request to remove his failure of selection for promotion has

‘commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants

favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action:

RECOMMENDATION ;

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected so that he
will be considered by the earliest possible selection board
convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to
CWO3 as an officer who has not failed of selection for promotion
to that grade.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

Dre £, (C12 Pn

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
‘ behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Te RY FE

FowW. DEAN ‘PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08569-09

    Original file (08569-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By enclosure (2), he amended his application, as it relates to the report for 1 May 2007 to 30 April 2008, to request that the report be modified, by removing section K (reviewing officer's marks and comments), rather than completely removed. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Fales and Grover, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12160-09

    Original file (12160-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board did not consider her request for remedial consideration, as she has been selected and promoted to. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06730-11

    Original file (06730-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. 6730-11 4 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00191-11

    Original file (00191-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2009 to 15 May 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. This request was not considered, as Petitioner may submit a request for a special selection board directly to the Secretary of the Navy, via HQMC {(MMPR-1), on the basis of the corrective actions in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03811-10

    Original file (03811-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3) Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01968-10

    Original file (01968-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    HOMC has advised that Subject was discharged on 1 November 2009 on the basis of failures of selection by the FY 2009 and 2010 CWO3 Selection Boards. Because of the two failures of selection for promotion, he was discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve on 1 November 2009.” CONCLUSION: Delete the sentence “If he fails of selection by the FY 2011 promotion board, the Board finds that failure of selection should be removed as well, since it must be removed to restore the status Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03363-09

    Original file (03363-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 3363-09 10 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: a See REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION) Ref: . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07625-09

    Original file (07625-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 1 June 2006 to 20 April 2007 by deleting, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “Capable officer that at times allowed the dynamic nature of operations to impact his overall efficiency and effectiveness. In enclosure (3), the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05747-10

    Original file (05747-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 11 October 2006 to 18 April 2007 (copy at Tab A). In enclosure (3), Petitioner also requested removing his failures of selection to chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 and 2010 CWO3 Selection Boards. Pursuant to the delegation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08270-09

    Original file (08270-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 8270-09 14 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] : “eee ar eet REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552: Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 18 Mar 09 w/attachments (2) HQMC MMER/PERB memo dtd 26 Jun 09 (3) HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 21 Jul 09 (4) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference-(a),...