Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09
Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100

 

BAN

Docket No. 06987-09
28 September 2009

 

 

Dear a

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval.
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

28 September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinions furnished by HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2

of 9 Sept 09, and HQMC memo 1650 MMMA-3 of 31 Aug 09, copies of which

are attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a
Majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with
the comments contained in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerel

\anean

W. DEAN P
Executive Di

 
  
  

Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS. DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104 ITHEDEYREKERYS:

1400/3
MMPR~2

SEP 09 2009

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS ,

 

Subj]: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF @

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01

    Original file (06369-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory In this connection, the Board substantially You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04062-02

    Original file (04062-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the letter to and policies. including the Bronze Star Medal, However, Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense provides for the consideration of award Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, which was enacted into law on February 10, 1996, recommendations, you be able to locate your former commanding officer or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03294-09

    Original file (03294-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. References (d) and (e) document the changes in the Marine Corps rank structure between 1 December 1946 and 1 August 2960.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06

    Original file (10020-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02755-09

    Original file (02755-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) states the requirements for promotion to the rank of corporal were as follows: (1) Complete the minimum time in grade/time in service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01074-01

    Original file (01074-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2001, a copy of which is attached. they were not present and cannot attest Statements from which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10157-08

    Original file (10157-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum MMPR-2 1400/3 of 27 February 2009, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09007-07

    Original file (09007-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2 The record of examination for promotion section of reference (b) show no evidence tha qian 2s sed any military...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08264-09

    Original file (08264-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The statements he submitted cannot be used as a determining factor for a Purple Heart award.