DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
SIN
Docket No: O7011-03
4 June 2009
Dear ¥
‘This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of Title i0 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June
2099. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable
statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) on
25 April 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, the
Board substantially concurred with the findings and conclusions of the
NDRB. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission wf new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
EBnelosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05324-09
A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) on 28 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00931-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01193-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. In addition, the Board considered a decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB}) dated September 17, 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09910-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09129-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10380-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2011. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09666-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2011. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09912-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 June 2011. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09631-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2011. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04202-08
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...