NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07137-09
to .the provisions of 10-USC.1552, "A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2009.. .Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07139-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No, 7139-09 18 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO_ ¢ Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07144-09
Petitioner signed and executed DD Form 4/3 acknowledging he was voluntarily enlisting in paygrade E-1, but now alleges he should have been enlisted in paygrade E-3 based on college credits earned prior to his enlistment. g. On 24 November 2008 Petitioner signed an “Advanced Paygrade Enlistment Statement of Understanding” indicating he was NOT eligible for Advanced Paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07146-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY — BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS: 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 07164-09 29 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy NAVAL RECORD ICO
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07154-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 07154-09 °30 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF g Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to. However, the Board is aware that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07158-09
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07162-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07165-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 CRG Docket No: 7165-09 13 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER =e Pr REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD REE (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Navy Reserve on i1 December 2007. c. That any...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07166-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07172-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07176-09
07176-09 ‘22 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj aa le REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD “Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was permanently ‘retired by reason of physical disability with a disability rating of 100%. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ‘i...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07179-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the geese of.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07182-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review ‘of the.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07194-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 1 December 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07196-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07199-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject submitted a timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage, under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), within one year of his divorce. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07200-09
07200-09 28 September 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07205-09
07205-0609 9 October 2009 _ From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: & 7 a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by adjusting his captain date of rank and effective date, 1 October 2009, to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 09 Staff Captain...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07210-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07213-09
A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on § December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07220-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1} DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/30 of 11 Feb 10 (3) Subject’s naval record i, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07224-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07225-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Deputy Director Casualty Assistance Division (N135C) of 14 Sept 09, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07234-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change of his narrative reason for separation and separation code on the Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Form 214). Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. That Petitioner's naval record is corrected as follows, and that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07236-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07240-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27:May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07247-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered his application on 27 May 2010. He was recommended for separation due to his pattern of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07251-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per references (a) through {c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07255-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07257-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07258-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07259-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07260-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable Material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07263-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. , After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were recommended for separation due to your commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07266-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07269-09
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07274-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07276-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07281-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 6 September 1993, you were notified that administrative discharge procedures were initiated and that you would receive a reenlistment code of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07282-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, the Board’s file on your previous case (docket number 00989-08}, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 August 2009 and the memorandum for the record dated 10 August 2009, copies of which are attached, and your letter dated 31 August 2009...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07284-09
7 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07286-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2009. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would.be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07287-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07288-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07289-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07291-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Purguant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07295-09
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your drug related misconduct which resulted in an NUP. Further, you were given an opportunity to defend yourself, but waived your procedural right to present your case to an administrative discharge board, Finally, there is no evidence in the record, and you submitted none, to support your assertion. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07302-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07304-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your NJP’s, SCM, and SPCM conviction for very serious misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07313-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SON Docket No: 07313-09 27 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records — To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF Sgiiiiiiiaeeaiiiieiiiaes Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected by...