NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07730-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the entitlement to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to his transfer to the Retired List was extended.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07738-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 February 1967 at age 19. on1 October 1968 and 27 May 1969 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07743-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 10 March 1988 after four years of prior honorable service. Nevertheless,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07756-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1981 at age 24. On 27 February 1984 the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07763-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 November 2005, a copy of which is attached. The member requests the removal of his performance evaluation for the period 16 March 1996 to 30 September 1996.2.Based on our review of the material provided, we find the following:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07771-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07773-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07777-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 6 January 1944. Although the request for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07781-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07784-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the other than honorable discharge issued on 16 March 1988.2 The Board consisting of Messrs andreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07787-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 31 January 1955 at age 25. on 9 December 1955 you were convicted by civil...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07788-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 8 January 1982 after four years of honorable service. On 20 March 1985,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07798-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. .JU~hIUIUUImI reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07800-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 September 1982 at age 19. You were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07801-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. The Board concluded that on 11 February 1988, you knew that you had been examined and found fit for separation on 29 December 1982, and that you were being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07801-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE . 07801-05 20 November 2006 Dear Mr. e.: This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07844-05
Applicant claims that his Commanding Officer was out to get him for his own personal reasons. A court-martial considers many factors before determining an accused’s guilt or innocence including: the facts presented by both parties, the credibility of the evidence presented, and the instructions on the law provided by the military judge. When a court-martial adjudges sentence, these2Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION IN THE CASE OFfactors include sentence limitations imposed by military law;...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07852-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you initially enlisted in the Navy on 9 November 1984. Although you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07854-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 March 2000. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07859-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 25 January 1990 at age 19. If not, the individual must be assigned a RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07866-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 June 1998 at age 19. The instruction states, in part, as follows:To...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07875-05
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed changing the ending date of the uncontested fitness report for 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2000 from 30 June 2000 to 12 February 2000. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 15 September 2005, a copy of which is attached. Per MCO 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members present, met on 14 September 2005 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07901-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07902-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07907-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07911-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 July 1997 at age 22. The disorder was disqualifying for service.Based...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07924-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board was not persuaded that you injured your lower back, left biceps muscle and left shoulder...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07934-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07950-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 11 October 1967 at age 18. Subsequently, on 22 September 1969 an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07959-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge and reason for discharge than the general discharge by reason of misconduct issued on 25 November 1998. Additionally, he requests that his reentry code of RE-4 be changed and that his records be corrected to show that he was a seaman (SN; E-3) at the time of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07961-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Navy Personnel Command dated 1 November 2005 as supplemented by the memorandum of 14 February 2006, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07974-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 August 2004 at age 20. At that time, you were assigned a RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07975-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07989-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07995-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS` 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJNDocket No: 07995-05 3 March 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr_ Mr. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s record of error and injustice on 1 March 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08066-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his prior duty station. The Board, consisting of Messrs. U~IIIhflIUIIUM reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08099-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2007. It did not consider your request for upgrade of your discharge, as you have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08100-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08120-05
The Board’s review was limited to your request for disability retirement, as you have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board for upgrade of your discharge to honorable.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08122-05
officer of the Naval Reserve Center forwarded his request for early retirement to the Commander, Naval Reserve Forces, recommending that early retirement be approved. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances of his retirement in the grade of LCDR. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that effective on 1 January 2000, he transferred to the Retired...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08161-05
Subsequently, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the reason for discharge to secretarial plenary authority because you were never diagnosed as alcohol dependent.In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were notsufficient to warrant a change in the reason for discharge, given your continuing alcohol problem as shown by the diagnosis of alcohol...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08171-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08177-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of his other than honorable discharge.2 T d, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 5 June 1986 an ADB, unanimously found that Petitioner had...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08185-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Although the request for discharge is not in your record, it appears that you subsequently requested an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing period of absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08195-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting changes in the reason for his discharge and reenlistment code.2. The ensuring service record entry stated, in part, as follows:MHU diagnosed (him) with a depressive disorder not otherwise specified, which existed prior to enlistment. Accordingly, the Board concludes that the reason for separation should now be changed to erroneous...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08266-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08275-05
The witness was an officer but was not Applicant’s platoon commander, reporting senior, reviewing officer, nor company commander at the time of the NJP.3. Per reference (a), an application for correction of a record must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice, unless the Board excuses the untimely filing in the interest of justice. Timely applications are crucial to a proper determination of an allegation of error where, as here, the ability to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08286-05
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1070 JAN7, 27 January 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You requested we provide an advisory opinion on~ (hereinafter “Applicant”) application to correct a wrongful reduction in rank.2. Instead this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08336-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 February 2001. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to non-retention on active duty. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08402-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...