NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07177-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07180-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marines Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr and Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07207-05
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 2 record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07245-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 25 October 2005, a copy of which is attached. In this case the reporting senior assigned a promotion recommendation of “Promotable”.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07247-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07262-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 4 November 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07283-05
e. The Department of the Navy regulations in effect at the time state that the Purple Heart should be awarded to individuals who are “wounded in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a result of an act of such enemy, provided such would necessitates treatment by a medical officer.” The regulations further state, in part, as follows:... For the purposes of awarding the Purple Heart, a wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07287-05
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 23 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07291-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Because of the requirement to comment on potential as well as their critical role inISubj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR ~ USMCsafeguarding the integrity of the PES, reviewing officer’s should make every...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07299-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. It concluded that your disability was properly rated at 20% under VA code 5235. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07306-05
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. When reviewing the petitioner’s case, the Board concluded that the report is a valid “extended” report. The overlapping...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07308-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, dated 26 October 2005, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal to the opinion.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07313-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that a summary court-martial be removed from his record or, in the alternative, that the court-martial sentence be reduced.2. Petitioner has been informed that the Board is prevented by law from reviewing courts-martial and must limit its review to determining if the sentence should be reduced as a matter of clemency.CONCLUSION:Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07320-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07388-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since these conditions do not apply to your case and you are still able to earn the Armed Forces Reserve Medal, the Board concluded that a correction to transfer retirement points is not warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07389-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07391-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAR) for his prior duty station.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07402-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07405-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner requested an extension of the 1-year period in which to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to his transfer to retired status. The Board, consisting of Messrs.iUIhIMU~UE~fl~~, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07418-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve and began a period of active duty on 19 January 2000, and served...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07427-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 March 1968 at age 18. As a result, on 5 March 1971, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07430-05
07430-05 11 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07434-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. On 10 August 1984, while serving in paygrade E-3, you were honorably released from active duty upon completion of your required active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07435-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability when released from active duty in 1987, the Board could not recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07438-05
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07441-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and assertion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07446-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 September 1966 at age 17 and served for over a year without disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07449-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, aformer enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with thisBoard requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 28 February1994.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07456-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 April 1986 the discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07467-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07490-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 29 January 1981 and reported to active duty...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07493-05
5420 Ser 00J3/097 12 Dec 05MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-3LC2 Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION ICO CDR Reference (a) requested this office provide comments on Petitioner’s request to remove service record documents related to a “matter of interest” holding stemming from a Commander Pacific Fleet hothine complaint report of investigation. On the contrary, reference (b) gives Commander, Navy Personnel...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07507-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAN) for his prior duty station.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07516-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07524-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 28 August 1981 and reported for active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07531-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. Reference (b) authorizes the issuance of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who have completed their enlistment and are serving in paygrade E-4 at the time of their release from active duty. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-i reenlistment code on 15 September...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07537-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100RGDocket No: 7537-05 8 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORDRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his discharge be recharacterized to honorable and that his reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07545-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07548-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations• and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 25 March 1973 at age 17 and served without incident for more than two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07575-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 August 2003 at. Following the NJP you were counseled and warned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07576-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAR) for his prior duty station.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07580-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 12 June 1986 and served in an active status until 23 May 1991...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07602-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 5 July 1962 at age 17. You also received six nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07622-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his prior duty station.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07634-05
Documentary mate jail considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1974. Unlike the VA, the military...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07663-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. Since Petitioner was probably truthful when he enlisted, the Board concludes that an RE-3E reenlistment code would be more appropriate in this case. The code will alert recruiters that there is a problem that must be resolved before enlistment is authorized.The Board further concludes that this Report of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07685-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. (13) to investigate the possibility of a positive urine drug test as a result of daily ingestion of various amounts of these “new’ t preparations, with total daily doses of THC ranging from 0.09 to 0.6 mg (equivalent to 45-300 g of hulled hemp seeds containing 2 /Lg/g THC or 19—120 mL of hemp-seed oil at 5 mg/L THC) in the form of blends of hemp- seed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07690-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The member submitted a statement, however, it was unsuitable for filing as it was not endorsed by the report senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07701-05
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), as amended by the memorandum for the record at enclosure (3), the HQMC Manpower Information Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems Division has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants favorable action. Corporal ‘s application concerning his request to correct his assigned duty proficiency and conduct markings of 3.5/3.0 assigned on 20021007, 1.0/1.0 assigned on 20030506, and 4.5/2.9 assigned on...