Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07934-05
Original file (07934-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
      WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~51OO    LCC
            Docket No. 7394-05
      12 Oct 05








         This is in reference to your application for correction of your
         naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
         States Code, section 1552.

         A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
         sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12
         October 2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were
         reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
         procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
         Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
         application, together with all material submitted in support
         thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
         and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
         opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/05U0620, 29
         September 2005, a copy of which is attached.

         After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
         record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
         insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error
         or injustice. The Board substantially concurred with the comments
         contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application
         has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
         will be furnished upon request.

         It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
         favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
         Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
         evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
         In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption
         of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
         applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
         is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
         material error or injustice.
      Sincerely,
            W.   DEAN PFET~~\
      Enclosure  Executive Dire t











                            DEPARTMENT OFTHE NAVY
                   OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
                             2000 NAVY PENTAGON
                         WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000
                                                                     IN
                                                                     REPLY
                                                                     REFER
                                                                     TO



                                                      7220
                                                      Ser N130C4/05U0620
                                                      29 Sep 05

         MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

                              OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Ref:  (a) DODFMR Volume 7A, Chapter 26

        (b)      SECNAVINST 7220.82 End: (1) BCNR Case File #07394-05

1.    Per your request, the following recommendation concerning enclosure
(1) is provided.

2.    Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing
(BAH) at the with-de~endent rate for (dependent location) vice (duty
station).

3.    lAW reference (a), BAH entitlement is based on the member’s Permanent
Duty Station (PDS) . Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent
location under certain circumstances. The petitioner’s circumstance does
not meet the criteria of reference (b)

4.    N13OC recommends disapproval of draw BAH at dependents location
itioner’s request to
A.~,.~stant Head, Pay and Allowances Section (N130C4)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07901-05

    Original file (07901-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11083-06

    Original file (11083-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/07U0069, 25 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06432-06

    Original file (06432-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. IAW reference (a), BAH entitlement is based on the member ‘s Permanent Duty Station (PDS)- Reference (b) allows...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03124-04

    Original file (03124-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02959-04

    Original file (02959-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07945-06

    Original file (07945-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N13OC4/06U0555, 2 October 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07840-06

    Original file (07840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7840-06 1Nov06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03214-04

    Original file (03214-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05709-06

    Original file (05709-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/06U0462, 21 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01820-07

    Original file (01820-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/07U0250, 20 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...