Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08336-05
Original file (08336-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHiNGTON DC 20370-5100


                                    CRS
 Docket No: 8336-05
23 February 2007







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 February 2001. The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial punishments, on 30 April 2002 and 22 April 2005. The offenses included failure to obey a lawful order on three occasions. Additionally, in your last two enlisted evaluations, beginning on 16 March 2005, you were not recommended for reenlistment, on 20 August 2005, while serving in pay grade E-4, you were honorably discharged with a narrative reason for separation of non-retention on active duty. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to non-retention on active duty. Clearly, your disciplinary action and the last two enlisted evaluations were sufficient to support the reenlistment code. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04231-11

    Original file (04231-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ybur application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 19 January 2007, you were honorably released from active duty due a reduction in force and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04516-08

    Original file (04516-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given your misconduct, alcohol rehabilitation failure, and the fact that the separation authorities were ordered to issue you an RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07631-06

    Original file (07631-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 15 November 2001 at age 18. You served without incident for over three...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01950-07

    Original file (01950-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 28 September 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 21. Given your three NJP’s, three PRT failures,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09177-08

    Original file (09177-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations. Since you were not recommended for advancement or retention in your next to last graded evaluation which covers the 21 July 2005 to 15 July 2006 period, you were not eligible for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00887-10

    Original file (00887-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10130-07

    Original file (10130-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07633-09

    Original file (07633-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 30 September 2009. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4 to indicate that you were not eligible for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03444-08

    Original file (03444-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11182-06

    Original file (11182-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 23 August 2002 at age 22 and began a period of active duty on 20...