Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07901-05
Original file (07901-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

               DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
      BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                             2 NAVY ANNEX

          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100      LCC
      Docket No. 7901-05
      18 Oct 05







         This is in reference to your application for correction of your
         naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
         States Code, section 1552.

         A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
         sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18
         October 2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were
         reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
         procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
         Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
         application, together with all material submitted in support
         thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
         and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
         opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/05U063l, 7
         October 2005, a copy of which is attached.

         After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
         record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
         insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error
         or injustice. The Board substantially concurred with the comments
         contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application
         has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
         will be furnished upon request.

         It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
         favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
         Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
         evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
         In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption
         of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
         applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
         is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
         material error or injustice.

                                               Sincerely,




                                                W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                                Executive Director
         Enclosure



























                            DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                   OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
                             2000 NAVY PENTAGON
                         WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000
                                                              N REPLY REFER
                                           TO





                                                           7220
                                                           Ser
                                                           N130C4/05U0631
                                                           7 Oct 05

         MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
                              OF NAVAL RECORDS

    Via:   Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

     Subj:


    Ref:   (a) DODFMR Volume 7A, Chapter 26
            (b) SECNAVINST 7220.82

     End:   (1) BCNR Case File #07901-05

    1.     Per your request, the following recommendation concerning
     enclosure (1) is provided.

    2.     Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for
     Housing (BAH) at the with-dependent rate for Jacksonville, FL
     (dependents’ location) vice Kings Bay, GA (temporary duty station)

    3.     lAW reference (a) chapter 26 table 26-9 rule 14, If member was
     assigned to a duty location outside the United States then the payable
     BAH rate is for the Permanent Duty Station (PDS) or the date member
     reports at the TDY location if the member reports there first. The
     petitioner reported to Kings Bay for TDY on 5 Sep 05. therefore she is
     entitled to BAH with dependents at the Kings Bay, GA rate until she
     checks into her ultimate PDS.

     4.     N13OC recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw
     BAH at dependents’ location (Jacksonville, FL) while TDY.



                                    Assistant Head, Pay and
                                  Allowances Section (N130C4)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02959-04

    Original file (02959-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03124-04

    Original file (03124-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03214-04

    Original file (03214-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04982-07

    Original file (04982-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/07U0437 of 14 June 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02409-03

    Original file (02409-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board cons application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered tl opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02615-02

    Original file (02615-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance 2. for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Chicago,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10356-06

    Original file (10356-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his prior duty station.2. The Board, consisting of Ivins, Neuschafer, and Ms Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07934-05

    Original file (07934-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06432-06

    Original file (06432-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. IAW reference (a), BAH entitlement is based on the member ‘s Permanent Duty Station (PDS)- Reference (b) allows...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11083-06

    Original file (11083-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/07U0069, 25 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...