Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08171-05
Original file (08171-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~5IOO


JRE
Docket No. 08171-05
13 November 2006




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 May 2004. Shortly after enlisting, you disclosed that you had been diagnosed with Down syndrome, and that you had received a special education diploma from high school. You were given diagnoses of learning and cognitive disorders, and recommended for discharge by reason of erroneous entry. On 17 June 2004, you were discharged by reason of erroneous entry, and assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as permitted by governing directives.

In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the diagnoses which resulted in your discharge are erroneous, and that it would be in the interest of justice to award you a more favorable reentry code, the there is no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,


                  W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                       Executive Director


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08380-06

    Original file (08380-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 22 May 2006. The evaluator concluded that you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09377-09

    Original file (09377-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code in view of the nature of those disorders.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04735-07

    Original file (04735-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 July 2006. A psychiatric evaluation conducted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04365-11

    Original file (04365-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2012. If another branch of service decides to waive your reentry code and accept you for enlistment, the Navy will not object. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02076-07

    Original file (02076-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10510-07

    Original file (10510-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 October 2006 at age 20. As a result, you were recommended for an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04701-07

    Original file (04701-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted af your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulatio~ 5 and Policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 5 May 2005, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. At that time you were assigned an RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06982-09

    Original file (06982-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11232-06

    Original file (11232-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 August 2006 at age 18. You were counseled regarding your condition, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06435-09

    Original file (06435-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...