DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No.
07781-05
4 October
2005
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF RECORD ICO
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachrnents
(2) Phonecon PNC , USS Princeton (CG-59), Mrs. , BCNR
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to cancel a reenlistment.
2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of
error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner’s al1eg~tions of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 07781-05
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:
a. The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 20 October 2004 is
null and void.
b. Petitioner will revert to the 3 year reenlistment executed on
or about 18 October 2002. This will reestablish an EAOS of 17 October 2005.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILL J. HESS III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the
revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with
its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective
action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
4 October 2005 W. DEAN PFIEFFER
Executive Director
2
I
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06261-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06004-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SK rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06061-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06067-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs.~UMIUUIUIIIUIjIUIIPIIIJI~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06071-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the GSM rating. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06163-05
6163-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 0311.2. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05336-05
5336-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05641-05
5641-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05640-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05296-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations,...