NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01270-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your navalrecord, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 6 October 1978 you enlisted in the Navy at the age of 19. On 30 October 1984 you were so...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01325-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01492-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 2 December 1942 at age 17 with parental consent. On 19 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01516-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 June 2000 at age 21. In the last enlisted performance evaluation of 26...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01537-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 12 March 1970 at age 18. In addition, you were awaiting trial in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01542-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in essence, that his record be corrected to show that he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service vice the release under honorable conditions actually issued; and that he received an honorable discharge upon completion of his military obligation, vice the general discharge actually issued.2 The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01619-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Agresti, Mr. Dawson, and Ms. Hurnberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 March 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01622-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Branch/Class (BR/CL) on the reenlistment contract executed on or about 27 January 2003 is 32, USNR(FTS), vice 11, USN. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01710-05
On 19 July 1963 he was separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unsuitability.h. However, regulations authorized no less than a general discharge for service members who are separated for this reason.j.The Board is also aware that characterization of service by reason of unsuitability is determined by the member’s military record, proficiency and conduct averages, and information pertaining to the military record.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01730-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 4 November 1985 at the age of 23 with a pre-service drug waiver...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01747-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 February 1999 at age 23. After review, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01790-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC 1100 Ser N1C2/730 of 22 Aug 05, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01801-05
The Board, consisting of Mr., Mr.and Mr., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show he was separated with an honorable discharge on 3 August 1954 and that he was recommended for reenlistment, vice the under honorable conditions discharge and the non-recommendation for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01849-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01903-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 12 June 1995 while you were serving on active duty in the grade of master sergeant, a physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01928-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that SMC is considered combat-related only in those cases where all of the conditions upon which the award of SMC is based are also combat-related. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01976-05
Per reference (a), the following comments and recommendations are submitted concerning AE2 case. Reference (b) states that a DD 214 is issued upon release of periods of active duty for more than 90 days to provide a clear-cut record of a period of active military service. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01979-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting an honorable characterization of service on his release from active duty on 13 March 1998.2. It is clear that absent the conviction by special court-martial, the characterization of his service would have been honorable. Additionally, the honorable discharge certificate issued at the end of his military obligation certainly suggests that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02027-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for prior duty station. The FY-0l National Defense Authorization Act authorized BAR for the prior duty station for service members and their dependents and NAVADMIN 230/01 disseminated the information and advised that requests...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02039-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 24 October 1983 at age 18. On 1 March 1985 and 4 April 1986, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02062-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 January 1983 at age 23. On 14 June 1984 the commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02130-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your two NJP’s for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02140-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You were honorably discharged from the Army on 16 August 1974 after three years of active service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02155-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02179-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by promoting him to major in the Marine Corps Reserve with a date of rank and effective date to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Reserve Major Selection Board, which is 1 July 2004. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Boyd and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02191-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 2191-05 19 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02198-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was restored to paygrade E-4 with the original effective date of grade and time in rate (TIR)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02220-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02267-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the YNSS rating.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02290-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02292-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, there is no evidence in the records to show that you abused drugs or alcohol while in the service.’ Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02325-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02335-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. With regard to your contention, the Board noted that there is no evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support it.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02337-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02346-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. On 13 May 1982 administrative separation action was initiated, and you were advised that such a separation could result in an honorable or general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02379-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your misconduct that resulted in three NJP’s and especially your request for discharge to avoid trial for a four month period of UA. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02384-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02390-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02399-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The record fails to reflect whether you were tried by SPCM, however, you received the 0TH discharge on 21 July 1989.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02412-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his prior duty station.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02432-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 8 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02493-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 October 2001 to 30 May 2002 and 1 November 2002 to 5 June 2003, copies of which are at Tabs A and B, respectively. Finally, she requested removal of any reference to her involuntary transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), her not being recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02495-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02498-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable haval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March 2001 to 15 March 2002 (copy at Tab A) to omit the bullets concerning nonjudicial punishment (NJP) and withdrawal of recommendation for advancement. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), PERS-311, the NPC office having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02540-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy after more than four years of prior active service....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02566-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repetitive drug-related misconduct, some of which occurred after you were warned of the consequences of further misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02570-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02580-05
Your allegations of error and injustice were •reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02633-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your misconduct and final military behavior average. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02637-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repetitive misconduct and your failure to attain the required average in military behavior. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...