Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02815-05
Original file (02815-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX
      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100    LCC
                                                         Docket No. 2185-05

                                                         12 Oct 05







  This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
  record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code,
  section 1552.

  A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
  sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October
  2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
  with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
  proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
  consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in
  support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
  and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion
  furnished by NPC memorandum 1420 PERS-482l, 13 September 2005, a copy of
  which is attached.

  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
  Board found that the evidence subr~iitted was insufficient to establish
  the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board
  substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory
  opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
  votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
  favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
  reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or
  other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it
  is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to
  all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
  official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
  existence of probable material error or injustice. t

                                        Sincerely,




                                        W.    DEAN PFEIFF~\~ Executive
  Dire~~Enclosure













                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                           NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
                            5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                          MILLINGTON TN 38055.0000

                                                                5420
                                                                PERS-4821
                                                                13 Sep 05

MEMORANDUM FOR SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR BCNR MATTERS (PERS-3LC2)

Subj:

Ref:  (a) Your ltr 5420 Pers-3LC2 of 16 Aug 05

End:  (1) BUPERS ltr 21 Jul 50

1.    Per enclosure (1) a determination of highest rank satisfactorily held
for retirement pay purposes was made on 21 July 1950 and recorded as
Lieutenant (Junior Grade)

2 If there are any qoestiou~regarding this matter please contact






                                    i~y v~irect ion

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01976-05

    Original file (01976-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (a), the following comments and recommendations are submitted concerning AE2 case. Reference (b) states that a DD 214 is issued upon release of periods of active duty for more than 90 days to provide a clear-cut record of a period of active military service. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09760-04

    Original file (09760-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also considered your memorandum dated 16 February 2005 with references.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Per reference (a), the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07493-05

    Original file (07493-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5420 Ser 00J3/097 12 Dec 05MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-3LC2 Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION ICO CDR Reference (a) requested this office provide comments on Petitioner’s request to remove service record documents related to a “matter of interest” holding stemming from a Commander Pacific Fleet hothine complaint report of investigation. On the contrary, reference (b) gives Commander, Navy Personnel...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05

    Original file (07416-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06444-06

    Original file (06444-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05

    Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04714-04

    Original file (04714-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute s, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant t demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07053-06

    Original file (07053-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS352G of 19 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06888-05

    Original file (06888-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07773-05

    Original file (07773-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...