Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02807-05
Original file (02807-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX

                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                     SMW
                                                     Docket No: 2807-05
                                                     21 October 2005







   This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
   record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code,
   section 1552.

   A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
   sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October
   2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
   with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
   proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
   consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in
   support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
   and policies.

   After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
   Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
   existence of probable material error or injustice.

   You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 June 1999 at age 19. You served
   without incident for more than 22 months. However, during the period from
   25 May 2001 to 23 April 2002 you received three nonjudicial punishments
   (NJP’s) for driving under the influence of alcohol, three instances of
   failure to obey a lawful order, and drunk and disorderly conduct. On 24
   April 2002 you were counseled regarding your misconduct and warned that
   further misconduct could result in administrative separation or
   disciplinary action. You then served without incident for about 14 months
   and also participated in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.
   On 24 June 2003, three days prior to your release from active duty, you
   were counseled for grabbing a military policeman’s pistol during a
   routine identification card check.

   On 27 June 2003 you were released from active duty under honorable
   conditions due to the expiration of your enlistment.

   Characterization of service is determined, in part, by proficiency and
   conduct mark averages computed from marks






















assigned on a periodic basis. Your final proficiency and conduct mark
averages were 4.4/3.9. Averages of 3.0 in proficiency and 4.0 in conduct
was required for a fully honorable characterization of service.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully
weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, and your
participation in Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. However, the Board
found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge given your repetitive misconduct and your failure to
maintain a 4.0 average in conduct. Therefore, the Board concluded that the
discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

The Board noted that you may be eligible for veteran’s benefits. You should
contact the nearest office of the Department of Veteran’s Affairs if you
desire clarification about your
eligibility of those benefits.
      Sincerely,




                                             w.  DEAN PFEIFFER
                                             Executive Director















                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01980-07

    Original file (01980-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05541-01

    Original file (05541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served without further incident and received a general discharge upon the expiration of your enlistment on 15 September 1953. of 4.0 in conduct was required for a fully honorable characteri- zation of service at the time of your discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600010

    Original file (ND0600010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I want an honorable discharge for my service. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06323-05

    Original file (06323-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04993-02

    Original file (04993-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in.accordance with administrative regulations and procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 4 August 1975 you received a general discharge by Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and both of which are computed from marks proficiency averages, assigned during periodic evaluations. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05576-10

    Original file (05576-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200542

    Original file (MD1200542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the Applicant completed his service obligation, his record of service included evidence of significant negative aspects, and his average Conduct marks did not meet the requirement to issue him an Honorable characterization. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05144-09

    Original file (05144-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were reactivated in the Marine Corps from 14 July 2004 to 15 March 2005, in support of Operation Noble Eagle/Enduring Freedom, in which you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10235-07

    Original file (10235-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 March 1976, your commanding officer initiated administrative separation processing under the Marine Corps ' expeditious discharge program, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02983-02

    Original file (02983-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...