Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02764-05
Original file (02764-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                            
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                                                          SRB
                                                                                          Docket No: 2764-05
                                                                                         
24 August 2005




From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

                  Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD


Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

En cl :    (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      NRC ltr 1133 Ser 32 undated
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.

2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. Countryman and Ms. LaBlanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.




Docket No. 2764-05 CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-2 effective 18 March 2003, which is the date he entered active duty.

b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Boaxitl’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, II I
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


24 August 2005
         W.       DEAN PFEI FFE R
Executive Dir ector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04301-05

    Original file (04301-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. Countryman and Ms. LaBlanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05863-05

    Original file (05863-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS .2NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06806-05

    Original file (06806-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In a telephone conversation with a representative from the Exam Center, the representative commented that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06447-05

    Original file (06447-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07402-05

    Original file (07402-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05303-05

    Original file (05303-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06310-05

    Original file (06310-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs.4pUIIIUU~, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07516-05

    Original file (07516-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07175-05

    Original file (07175-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08653-05

    Original file (08653-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected,...