Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03306-05
Original file (03306-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
 Docket No. 3306-05
          24       Aug      05


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
         

         En cl :    (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
                  (2)      NPC memo 1430 Ser 48llAl/264, 13 Jun 05
                  (3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.
2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2) , the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

Docket No. 3306-05
 RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-6 effective 16 December 2004.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, II I
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



26 August 2005


                                                      W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07402-05

    Original file (07402-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06310-05

    Original file (06310-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs.4pUIIIUU~, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3306 14

    Original file (NR3306 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing the imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NUP) on 4 April 2012 for failure to obey a lawful order and an administrative remarks (Page 11) entry regarding her norirecommendation for promotion due to the NIP, also dated 4 April 2012. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05863-05

    Original file (05863-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS .2NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05695-05

    Original file (05695-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05296-05

    Original file (05296-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07247-05

    Original file (07247-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08100-05

    Original file (08100-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02570-05

    Original file (02570-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06806-05

    Original file (06806-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In a telephone conversation with a representative from the Exam Center, the representative commented that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...