Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04826-02
Original file (04826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4826-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 1 August 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes of

 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

PERSONNEL 

NAVY 
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

COMMAND

Y

178 0
PERS
604
1 Aug 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

I....___

-

.._”

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 23 Jul 02
(b) Public Law 106-419

The following is provided in response to reference (a).

1.
Recommend disapproval of
on his MGIB enrollment.
irrevocable (Section 104 of reference
enrolled in the MGIB on 30  
15 May 02 is invalid and will not be processed.

(b)).

Ott  01, the DD Form 236

Since

I request to change his mind
MGIB Program

This office

concur that an administrative error occurred since
enrolled in the MGIB Program, then later changed his

which he acknowledges.

mind,
happened is that PSD should have destroyed the properly
witnessed enrollment form when he changed his mind, contrary to
reference (b).

What he is suggesting should  

have

2.
reached  at 

PERS-604's point of contact is M

(DSN)  882-4260 or (c) 901-874-4260.

p  

who can be

'~"

-.

_

_

” 

-.

 

l.

go

Rutired  Activities and

Head,
GI Bill Programs Branch
(PERS-604)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05347-02

    Original file (05347-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b) the decision to enroll/disenroll in the MGIB Program is irrevocable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02692-02

    Original file (02692-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I’EKS-604 tlic Board considered the advisory of‘ 24 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N A VY PERSONNEL C OMM AN D 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02

    Original file (02563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02220-02

    Original file (02220-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of ; entry onto active duty in 1980, it would have been impossible for him to have been counseled an education assistance program that didn't exist until 1985. no one could have enrollment period, requirements of the VEAP to Montgomery GI Bill conversion opportunities that didn't...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02765-02

    Original file (02765-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 14 June 2002, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06603-02

    Original file (06603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opening a VEAP account prior to the legislated deadlines, he is not eligible for VEAP benefits or conversion to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02199-02

    Original file (02199-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the Board considered the advisory 30 May 2002, a copy of which of‘ is conscientious consideration of ‘ the entire recortl, the Board found that the est:tblish the existence of probable material error or After careful and evidence submitted injustice. The names and votes of ot’ your It is regretted that the circumstances You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. request to enroll in the eview of cord indicates...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02

    Original file (01712-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02460-02

    Original file (02460-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Board. Program record accordingly. PERS-604 has corrected This was apparently an erroneous entry He may have received this information ce, Denver has for MGIB Program electronic MGIB money was collected for Accoun fro c. W declined enrollment in the MGIB Program in writing on 29 March 1991 and no money was collected for enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08083-01

    Original file (08083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 J LP: yrj Docket No: X083-0 9 July 2002 1 panel A three-member session, considered your were reviewed in proceedings of‘ this Board. application, together with all applicable statutes. regulations opinion furnished NI’C attached.