Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04782-02
Original file (04782-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

WASHINGTON  DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

CRS 
Docket No:  4782-02 
10 January 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United 
States Code, Section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
~ecords, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 7 January 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 4 
December 1996.  A psychiatric evaluation, conducted on 2 July 
1997, found that you had an adjustment disorder and that you had 
used drugs in an attempt to be discharged.  On 26 July 1997 you 
made a statement that in May  1997 you had gone to Mexico and used 
marijuana.  The record reflects that on 31 July 1997 you received 
nonjudicial punishment for failing to obey a lawful regulation by 
going to Mexico and using marijuana. 

On 27 August 1997 the commanding officer recommended that you be 
separated with an other than honorable discharge by  reason of 
misconduct due to drug abuse.  When informed of the 
recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your 
case to an administrative discharge board.  After review by the 
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was 
approved and on 5 October 1997 you were discharged with an other 
than honorable discharge. 

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all 
potentially mitigating factors, such as the contentions that your 
fragile state of mind rendered you incapable of making an 
incriminating statement, you were not advised of your right 
against self incrimination, a single instance of drug use should 
not have resulted in discharge, subsequent drug tests were 
negative, pressure from your commanding officer contributed to 
the incriminating statement, and the statement was made under 
mental distress. 

Although your were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, such a 
diagnosis would not render you incapable of making a statement 
against your interests.  The record does not specifically reflect 
that you were advised of your right against self-incrimination. 
However, even if you were not, this failure to so advise you does 
not render your statement inadmissible at NJP or in 
administrative separation proceedings.  Any drug tests that you 
took are essentially irrelevant, since you received NJP and 
separated based on your incriminating statement.  In accordance 
with Marine Corps policy, all drug abusers are processed  for 
separation, and those separated normally are discharged under 
other than honorable conditions.  Concerning your allegations of 
command pressure and coercion, the Board noted that you have 
submitted no evidence to support these contentions, and the 
record contains no such evidence. 
Accordingly, your application 
has been denied.  The names and votes of the members of the panel 
will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board. 
In this regard, kt  is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03601-01

    Original file (03601-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The psychiatric reports noted, in part, that you were frustrated with Navy life. you were found to be a drug You were offered, but declined, On 4 September 1997...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00087

    Original file (ND01-00087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00087 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001019, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I respectfully request that you upgrade my military discharge from general to honorable. After the psychologist evaluation I was discharged from the Navy with a personality disorder.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00879

    Original file (ND03-00879.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00879 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030424. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. My first incident of Non-Judicial Punishment was the result of a port call in March of 1998 the ship had in Cairns.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00385

    Original file (ND99-00385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This servicemember has a personality disorder that renders him at continuing risk for engagement in maladaptive or potentially self-injurious behavior. The Board cannot alter history, and at the time the applicant was discharged, a qualified medical officer determined that the applicant had a personality disorder that rendered him a continuing risk of potentially self-injurious behavior, reacting to psychological stress maladaptively and with poor potential for future service. In the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01079

    Original file (ND02-01079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01079 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020723, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I need immediate medical help for my broken back condition. PRAR (Applicant) wishes to continue his obligation and would like to make a career of the naval service.991022: CNPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00846

    Original file (ND02-00846.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00846 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020530, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans’ benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00974

    Original file (ND00-00974.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00974 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000802, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to something other than personality disorder. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1, that the reason for discharge should be changed because “Not Otherwise Seen” was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00279

    Original file (ND02-00279.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 951014, uncharacterized for convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the applicant incapable of serving adequately in the Naval Service. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of continuous active duty are given the characterization of service as “Entry Level Separation” or “Uncharacterized” unless...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02859-08

    Original file (02859-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 19 March 1993, you were so discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00781

    Original file (ND00-00781.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00781 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000531, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Sincerely Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of applicant's DD Form 214 (2 copies) Two partial Evaluation Report/Counseling Record dated 980105 and 98Jun19 Eighteen pages from applicant's service record PART II -...